Trump's Madison Square Garden rally

[Anonymous]

Bad Bunny with a new video titled “Garbage.”

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DBtmbHquuhb/?igsh=N3l1dXEyYXF1dndn

The ending with Benecio Del Toro is just perfect 🤌🏼🤌🏼🤌🏼

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bad Bunny with a new video titled “Garbage.”

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DBtmbHquuhb/?igsh=N3l1dXEyYXF1dndn

The ending with Benecio Del Toro is just perfect 🤌🏼🤌🏼🤌🏼

I don’t speak Spanish, but I knew that loaner word.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Whatever happened to civility? Forget the political ramifications of insulting a particular ethnic group. MAGA claims to want to return to 1950's America, but this kind of language and vulgarity would have been unheard of in those days.

Check out how uncivil politicans were in the past, it would shock you.

In the 18th century, John Adams called Alexander Hamilton a “bastard brat” and wrote that Hamilton had “a superabundance of secretions which he could not find whores enough to draw off,” according to historian Ron Chernow.

In the 1880s, rumors of Grover Cleveland’s out-of-wedlock child led to a song from his Republican opponents: “Ma, ma, where’s my pa?” When Cleveland won the presidency, the response came: “Gone to the White House, ha ha ha!”

“Old-fashioned American politics was full of those kinds of vile comments,” said Arnold Shober, who teaches government at Lawrence University in Appleton, Wisconsin. “We’ve kind of lost that over the last 70 years, and I think it’s just coming back.”

Not that 20th century politicians shied away from vulgarities. Here’s President Bill Clinton describing his 1970s El Camino pickup truck: “I had Astroturf in the back. You don’t want to know why, but I did.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Whatever happened to civility? Forget the political ramifications of insulting a particular ethnic group. MAGA claims to want to return to 1950's America, but this kind of language and vulgarity would have been unheard of in those days.

Check out how uncivil politicans were in the past, it would shock you.

In the 18th century, John Adams called Alexander Hamilton a “bastard brat” and wrote that Hamilton had “a superabundance of secretions which he could not find whores enough to draw off,” according to historian Ron Chernow.

In the 1880s, rumors of Grover Cleveland’s out-of-wedlock child led to a song from his Republican opponents: “Ma, ma, where’s my pa?” When Cleveland won the presidency, the response came: “Gone to the White House, ha ha ha!”

“Old-fashioned American politics was full of those kinds of vile comments,” said Arnold Shober, who teaches government at Lawrence University in Appleton, Wisconsin. “We’ve kind of lost that over the last 70 years, and I think it’s just coming back.”

Not that 20th century politicians shied away from vulgarities. Here’s President Bill Clinton describing his 1970s El Camino pickup truck: “I had Astroturf in the back. You don’t want to know why, but I did.”

I just don’t see the point of you posting. We cannot elect Grover Cleveland nor John Adams. People find Donald Trump repellant, and you can’t ‘contextualize’ him while ignoring changing mores after great civil rights were achieved for women and non-white Americans. But do you, reason doesn’t ever stop you.

[Anonymous]

I'll say it again: if you're still in Trump's camp at this point, you're not a good person. You just aren't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Exactly ^^. How on earth is this controversial? Honestly, this was the least controversial thing I’ve heard in a long time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'll say it again: if you're still in Trump's camp at this point, you're not a good person. You just aren't.

What will you do if Trump wins?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

“What he meant was…” /s

Yeah, they’re white supremacists. I don’t think there has actually been any great number of minorities flocking to the maga party, but for those who have: you’d be slaughtered just as fast any other brown person. You’re not “one of the good ones,” you’re a useful tool.

And that goes for all the women stupid enough to think they’ll be treated differently, too. Harris has worked for all she’s achieved and they still want to cut her down with oral sex and prostitute remarks; you really think you’re different in their eyes?

DP. Are you the lunatic who insisted that Trump would be “rounding up black people and putting them in camps”? Or that “women would have their credit cards and right to vote taken away”? Because your unhinged rhetoric sure sounds the same. Seek help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'll say it again: if you're still in Trump's camp at this point, you're not a good person. You just aren't.

What will you do if Trump wins?

It'll just be four years at most. Likely less than that given his age, weight, and mental decline. If Trump wins, I'll be comforted in knowing that his political time has finally come to an end. It's his last brief chapter. He's soon going to be out of all our lives forever, and the country is going to be so much better off for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which party is more anti-Semitic?

I know this one!!! The one with swastikas on their Trump campaign signs!

https://www.yahoo.com/news/know-photos-trump-sign-swastika-234100144.html

Unless of course you think some crafty Democrats are playing 20 dimensional chess? That’s always a possibility right?

Ah - the moron who keeps posting fake pictures and expecting other idiots to fall for it. Grow up. From your own link:

However, while the Trump campaign sells a similar sign matching many of the details of the sign in the photos, the campaign does not sell any products displaying a swastika. Someone either altered an existing sign to add the symbol or created entirely new signage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'll say it again: if you're still in Trump's camp at this point, you're not a good person. You just aren't.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD says we all have to stop “being so offended.” In other words: he agrees with everything they said: Jewish people are cheapskates, something something Black people and watermelons, Latinos have too much procreative sex, the implication that all women are pretty just hookers no matter who they are or what they do. JD agrees with all of it, as does Donald when you consider that he hasn’t bothered to say anything.

People are offended because the "jokes" were told at an official political rally for a presidential candidate. The comments were offensive, not funny.

It was not a “joke”. It was a racist tirade.

Jon Stewart thinks the guy is funny fwiw https://x.com/piersmorgan/status/1851230925448696003?s=46&t=vCkHaGKqgGqkHvzMN6JuFg

He’s had roast jokes that are funny. I hate Trump and I can even admit that - and that’s all Stewart was saying when you actually watch the show. Doesn’t mean having him at a political rally was in any way a good idea.

Of course it wasn’t a good idea. It was a terrible idea but come on the outrage is ridiculous and predictably used as a political baseball bat by the dems and I don’t blame them. The cnn/msnbc journalists performance act is over the top.

+1
His “jokes” at the rally were indeed, awful. But I agree - the outrage act is so overdone.

[Anonymous]

https://www.ajc.org/translatehate/great-replacement

“White nationalists and far-right protestors chanted "Jews will not replace us" during the infamous 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, VA.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'll say it again: if you're still in Trump's camp at this point, you're not a good person. You just aren't.

What will you do if Trump wins?

It'll just be four years at most. Likely less than that given his age, weight, and mental decline. If Trump wins, I'll be comforted in knowing that his political time has finally come to an end. It's his last brief chapter. He's soon going to be out of all our lives forever, and the country is going to be so much better off for it.

You know he's never going to be "out of all of our lives forever," right? He will be in our faces and meddling in our politics until his last breath. He has an insatiable desire for attention, even if it's negative attention. The bigger issue is that there are millions of Americans who are receptive to his style and messages and who may latch on to another unprincipled demagogue like him in the future. They're not going away. They alive amongst us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD says we all have to stop “being so offended.” In other words: he agrees with everything they said: Jewish people are cheapskates, something something Black people and watermelons, Latinos have too much procreative sex, the implication that all women are pretty just hookers no matter who they are or what they do. JD agrees with all of it, as does Donald when you consider that he hasn’t bothered to say anything.

He’s not going to apologize. His campaign vetted it and told the comedian he could call Harris a c*nt. That’s where they drew the line.

https://newrepublic.com/post/187657/donald-trump-racist-comedian-kamala-harris-joke

Ah, you’re going with the old “anonymous sources” and “campaign staffer,” I see. And from a far-left source. But sure, very believable.

CNN reports that the c*unt joke was nixed by the campaign.

Which means that the rest was read through and APPROVED before the comedian walked on stage!

Oh noes!!! *clutching pearls*

This fake outrage is getting old.

+1
Especially, because the campaign notes that much of his act was ad libbed. They still made a big mistake allowing him to perform, but it’s not like they approved his racial jokes.