| Should DC absorb suburbs when it becomes a state? Seems like the district is having trouble enforcing residency requirements for agency heads and since most of the city workforce aka commuters lives in the suburbs? |
|
And leave rural VA and MD to be their own states? No thanks.
More people live in DC than live in WY, but nobody is suggesting WY get absorbed. |
|
If you want to Give DC back the original footprint that is fine.
Other than that - I don't get it |
|
By what mechanism or authority or leverage would DC annex parts of Md and Va?
You say should like it’s even an option. |
| Even trade. Make the whole area inside the Beltway a state (Maryland would still be blue). In exchange, merge the Dakotas and Wyoming with Montana. |
| Also I favor statehood for dc but you say “when”. It’s an “if”. |
| Ugh, no. There's a million good reasons I don't want to be governed by DC politicians. |
Thanks for the laugh. While DC becoming a state MIGHT happen in the distant future, it would never be able to add to its current footprint. |
| No thank you. Arlington and Alexandria do not want to be part of any DC state government. |
Is your premise that DC should absorb the suburbs because the people running DC don't want to live there? |
| Funny, that government you deride has a AAA bond rating and a $7B rainy day fund that is the envy if almost every governor in the union. |
| DC is never going to be a State. Never. |
| D.C. won't become a state until Democrats control the White House, the House and have a filibuster proof majority in the Senate, and maybe not even then. Basically, it's never going to happen, not in our lifetimes. |
This. The USA as we know it might be done before DC becomes a state. The democrats might never have 60 senators. |
Yes, Maryland already gave up its share (including our fine port city of Georgetown, Maryland). Maybe Virginia would honor its share of bargain, though? |