That Brock Allen Turner is a dirtbag

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Brock raped her! The jury of his peers returned a guilty verdict. He is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Should be in jail where some guy name Rufus will take care of his lily white little ass.

This doesn't make you sound better than him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brock raped her! The jury of his peers returned a guilty verdict. He is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Should be in jail where some guy name Rufus will take care of his lily white little ass.

This doesn't make you sound better than him.

Hey, eye for an eye isn't always a bad thing...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let me say this right now as a man and a father. If he were my son, he would be in a sh*tload of trouble beyond what the law provides and he would face the music.

Only once in my life back in college when I was drunk did I make a stupid decision - it did not involve actively raping someone - but I was conscious enough at the time to know what I was doing was wrong and did it anyway. So, no, I do not buy his "I was confused bit."

I've also been with women who've had too much to drink as have I at the same time, but never once did I used that situation to take advantage of her. Believe me, whatever sex occurred then, was quiet consensual.

My boys know to respect women and treat them well. As for my daughter's I hope they will keep their wits about them as they cannot trust any male, but in such a case as this I hope they crush the balls of any motherf*cker who tries to rape them. If they can't I will.

Hey Brock Turner's Dad - you're a shitbag. F*ck you and your bad parenting. Too bad your son blew his ride. Maybe next time you'll raise your kids better.

ITA. Wish you could send this to Brock's daddy.

[Anonymous]

His life is already ruined. People should move on and not gloat. What more do you want? Americans are sick and D. Trump may be elected Prez as a result.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:His life is already ruined. People should move on and not gloat. What more do you want? Americans are sick and D. Trump may be elected Prez as a result.

Through his own criminal actions! What do we want? In America we tend to want a punishment commensurate with the crime, not three to six months in jail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brock raped her! The jury of his peers returned a guilty verdict. He is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Should be in jail where some guy name Rufus will take care of his lily white little ass.

This doesn't make you sound better than him.

Hey, eye for an eye isn't always a bad thing...

No one should be raped.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brock raped her! The jury of his peers returned a guilty verdict. He is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Should be in jail where some guy name Rufus will take care of his lily white little ass.

This doesn't make you sound better than him.

Hey, eye for an eye isn't always a bad thing...

Yeah, it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:wish people would stop calling it rape. it was sexual assault. rape charges were dropped.

would be interested to read examination and cross-examination of victim but unable to find. here is the complaint with statements by involved persons: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/1532973/complaint-brock-turner.pdf

California's laws only call it rape if there was penetration by a penis. In many states, any penetration of the body by another person's body part is rape. It technically wasn't rape in California. It would technically be rape if it had occurred in another state. Forcible penetration qualifies as rape for most people.

Why is this issue so important to you? You've posted many times "but it wasn't rape" as if that makes what he did more palatable or excusable or defensible.

He's a sex offender and a predator. The legal technicalities of what can and can't be charged against him are just that -- legal technicalities.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:wish people would stop calling it rape. it was sexual assault. rape charges were dropped.

would be interested to read examination and cross-examination of victim but unable to find. here is the complaint with statements by involved persons: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/1532973/complaint-brock-turner.pdf

California's laws only call it rape if there was penetration by a penis. In many states, any penetration of the body by another person's body part is rape. It technically wasn't rape in California. It would technically be rape if it had occurred in another state. Forcible penetration qualifies as rape for most people.

Why is this issue so important to you? You've posted many times "but it wasn't rape" as if that makes what he did more palatable or excusable or defensible.

He's a sex offender and a predator. The legal technicalities of what can and can't be charged against him are just that -- legal technicalities.

Rape is a legal term so calling someone a rapist who didn't meet the legal definition is slander. He seems like a horny guy who got drunk and made bad decisions that technically amounted to assault.

If this guy were black the liberals would be falling all over themselves to contextualize his behavior and excuse his conduct. Many people recognize that and continuing to bash this young man with verbal bricks is just one example of why Trump stands a very good chance of being elected President.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:wish people would stop calling it rape. it was sexual assault. rape charges were dropped.

would be interested to read examination and cross-examination of victim but unable to find. here is the complaint with statements by involved persons: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/1532973/complaint-brock-turner.pdf

California's laws only call it rape if there was penetration by a penis. In many states, any penetration of the body by another person's body part is rape. It technically wasn't rape in California. It would technically be rape if it had occurred in another state. Forcible penetration qualifies as rape for most people.

Why is this issue so important to you? You've posted many times "but it wasn't rape" as if that makes what he did more palatable or excusable or defensible.

He's a sex offender and a predator. The legal technicalities of what can and can't be charged against him are just that -- legal technicalities.

Not exactly true. California's law is more nuanced than that. But because the only provable crime was what the Swedes saw, because the victim could not say anything prior to that was nonconsensual, they dropped the rape charges.

Does it matter? Not if rape is rape. If there's a difference between rape and sexual assault and if there are different kinds of rape, then yes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:wish people would stop calling it rape. it was sexual assault. rape charges were dropped.

would be interested to read examination and cross-examination of victim but unable to find. here is the complaint with statements by involved persons: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/1532973/complaint-brock-turner.pdf

California's laws only call it rape if there was penetration by a penis. In many states, any penetration of the body by another person's body part is rape. It technically wasn't rape in California. It would technically be rape if it had occurred in another state. Forcible penetration qualifies as rape for most people.

Why is this issue so important to you? You've posted many times "but it wasn't rape" as if that makes what he did more palatable or excusable or defensible.

He's a sex offender and a predator. The legal technicalities of what can and can't be charged against him are just that -- legal technicalities.

Rape is a legal term so calling someone a rapist who didn't meet the legal definition is slander. He seems like a horny guy who got drunk and made bad decisions that technically amounted to assault.

If this guy were black the liberals would be falling all over themselves to contextualize his behavior and excuse his conduct. Many people recognize that and continuing to bash this young man with verbal bricks is just one example of why Trump stands a very good chance of being elected President.

You really need to read this whole thread. And if he were black - the black star athlete who did a very similar thing at Vanderbilt got a 15-25-year prison sentence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:wish people would stop calling it rape. it was sexual assault. rape charges were dropped.

would be interested to read examination and cross-examination of victim but unable to find. here is the complaint with statements by involved persons: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/1532973/complaint-brock-turner.pdf

California's laws only call it rape if there was penetration by a penis. In many states, any penetration of the body by another person's body part is rape. It technically wasn't rape in California. It would technically be rape if it had occurred in another state. Forcible penetration qualifies as rape for most people.

Why is this issue so important to you? You've posted many times "but it wasn't rape" as if that makes what he did more palatable or excusable or defensible.

He's a sex offender and a predator. The legal technicalities of what can and can't be charged against him are just that -- legal technicalities.

Rape is a legal term so calling someone a rapist who didn't meet the legal definition is slander. He seems like a horny guy who got drunk and made bad decisions that technically amounted to assault.

If this guy were black the liberals would be falling all over themselves to contextualize his behavior and excuse his conduct. Many people recognize that and continuing to bash this young man with verbal bricks is just one example of why Trump stands a very good chance of being elected President.

You really need to read this whole thread. And if he were black - the black star athlete who did a very similar thing at Vanderbilt got a 15-25-year prison sentence.

Not very similar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

It is crazy that people do not want to put things in place to make college campus's safer. It's like safety belts, we know there are bad drivers everywhere, so we need to protect ourselves.

Men rape... we need to put things in place that protect us from rapists.

One of the things that can protect women from rapists is acknowledging that it's still rape, even if the man is drunk. If men understood that and weren't so easily given a pass on it, maybe they would be more careful not to get so drunk or to be proactive about seeking consent. I know for a fact that, before we started dating, DH refused sexual advances from a woman he was actually dating because he felt that both of them were too drunk to be making choices the wouldn't later regret. Decent men understand that women are human beings...and that understanding doesn't just evaporate because they are drunk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:wish people would stop calling it rape. it was sexual assault. rape charges were dropped.

would be interested to read examination and cross-examination of victim but unable to find. here is the complaint with statements by involved persons: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/1532973/complaint-brock-turner.pdf

California's laws only call it rape if there was penetration by a penis. In many states, any penetration of the body by another person's body part is rape. It technically wasn't rape in California. It would technically be rape if it had occurred in another state. Forcible penetration qualifies as rape for most people.

Why is this issue so important to you? You've posted many times "but it wasn't rape" as if that makes what he did more palatable or excusable or defensible.

He's a sex offender and a predator. The legal technicalities of what can and can't be charged against him are just that -- legal technicalities.

Rape is a legal term so calling someone a rapist who didn't meet the legal definition is slander. He seems like a horny guy who got drunk and made bad decisions that technically amounted to assault.

If this guy were black the liberals would be falling all over themselves to contextualize his behavior and excuse his conduct. Many people recognize that and continuing to bash this young man with verbal bricks is just one example of why Trump stands a very good chance of being elected President.

Your last paragraph, you got it all wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

What exactly are you expecting to happen? You want to be able to stumble bum around black out drunk whenever/wherever you please with the GUARANTEE that nothing bad will happen to you? Ha. Dream on.

Not the PP, but I think the desirable situation would be that if you are stumbling around drunk and someone attacks you, more blame is placed on the attacker than on you. I learned defensive driving in drivers ed. That has been useful on the road when someone is clearly swerving and/or speeding recklessly. If they hit me, though, the reaction is not likely to be, "Did you remember to drive defensively?" as opposed to, "Why was that person driving 115mph and changing lanes?"

It's not BLAME. It's preparing ourselves for the future. You hear about that terrible accident and tell your kids "don't drive recklessly AND do drive defensively." You even might say "there are angry drivers out there, just be cool so you don't trigger road rage."

OMG, one day later and you are still here responding to every other post about the need to prepare women and minimize risks. Here's the thing, no one is perfect all the time. Even the best of us will do stupid things because we are human. So yes, IT IS IMPORTANT TO TEACH GIRLS HOW TO PROTECT THEMSELVES AND NOT PUT THEMSEVLES IN VULNERABLE POSITIONS. But posters here are angry about a verified sexual assault and all you can do is come back post after post about how girls are putting themselves at risk.