Mother of 2 from VERY prominent Richmond family arrested by FBI for child p@rn, exploitation, etc

[Anonymous]

For everyone saying that mental illness can equal legal insanity, they do not know the incredible threshold for insanity. Someone in the midst of a psychotic or delusional episode may not even be insane if they acted in a way that they knew what they did was wrong:flee a scene, hide from the cops, lie about what happened. It's a very very high standard that most mentally ill people would never be able to meet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hoppe's only hope is to be found not guilty by reason of insanity and spend a few years in mental hospital and be declared rehabilitated and then released.

I think you may be unpleasantly surprised at how the "justice system" works for the wealthy and connected.

At least the widespread publicity will come up in a Google search and may curtail a bit her access to IRL victims.

She's got connections in Virginia, but that may not translate to Federal court and her demographics may work against her at the Federal level. A Caucasian Disney Princess sentenced to a decade in Federal prison without any dispensation would feed the appetite of Critical Race Theory advocates.

That's not a thing in federal district court, especially DDC. She'll get offered a plea based on the facts of the case. If no plea, she'll get a trial before a jury of people from the DC pool. She'll be sentenced based on the sentencing guidelines. Neither the US Attorney nor the judge will GAF who her parents are/were, and even if the criminal defense attorney is well respected, that won't make a difference (although of course her case will be better presented if the person is good). There will probably be some sympathy among both the USAO office and the DDC judges for her ex, who is probably a couple degrees of separation from them ....so that might weight a tiny bit in favor of trying to get a plea that will keep this whole mess out of the public eye any more than it has to be.

The enticement charge has a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years, but it's somewhat less explicit than the photos and transporting a minor charges. I think the government would drop the other charges in exchange for a guilty plea for the enticement charge. Ten years in prison is a long time, so she may choose to spend every last nickel on trying for a not guilty by reason of insanity verdict, since it seems like she has some mental health issues.

Where is the evidence that she has mental health issues? Or mental health issues outside of those anyone who wants to molest kids would have?

From previous comments in this thread from those who claim to know her and her family. She may have documented evidence of being treated by a psychiatrist and can most certainly pay a psychiatrist to declare her insane. John Hinkley came from a prominent family and has now a free man after trying to assassinate the President, wounding him and three others and spent his sentence in a hospital. She's facing a minimum of 15 years in prison and could be sentenced to life in prison. She might as well expend her wealth on trying to escape this fate, as it won't benefit her in prison. If Hinkley can get out from under trying to assassinate the President, then it's not beyond the pale to think that Hoppe can not do the same with these charges. There aren't any victims in Hoppe's case. It's all based on her state of mind.

the kids who were abused in the photos/videos Hoppe shared w the UC agent are real people and they are victims.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hoppe's only hope is to be found not guilty by reason of insanity and spend a few years in mental hospital and be declared rehabilitated and then released.

I think you may be unpleasantly surprised at how the "justice system" works for the wealthy and connected.

At least the widespread publicity will come up in a Google search and may curtail a bit her access to IRL victims.

She's got connections in Virginia, but that may not translate to Federal court and her demographics may work against her at the Federal level. A Caucasian Disney Princess sentenced to a decade in Federal prison without any dispensation would feed the appetite of Critical Race Theory advocates.

That's not a thing in federal district court, especially DDC. She'll get offered a plea based on the facts of the case. If no plea, she'll get a trial before a jury of people from the DC pool. She'll be sentenced based on the sentencing guidelines. Neither the US Attorney nor the judge will GAF who her parents are/were, and even if the criminal defense attorney is well respected, that won't make a difference (although of course her case will be better presented if the person is good). There will probably be some sympathy among both the USAO office and the DDC judges for her ex, who is probably a couple degrees of separation from them ....so that might weight a tiny bit in favor of trying to get a plea that will keep this whole mess out of the public eye any more than it has to be.

The enticement charge has a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years, but it's somewhat less explicit than the photos and transporting a minor charges. I think the government would drop the other charges in exchange for a guilty plea for the enticement charge. Ten years in prison is a long time, so she may choose to spend every last nickel on trying for a not guilty by reason of insanity verdict, since it seems like she has some mental health issues.

Where is the evidence that she has mental health issues? Or mental health issues outside of those anyone who wants to molest kids would have?

From previous comments in this thread from those who claim to know her and her family. She may have documented evidence of being treated by a psychiatrist and can most certainly pay a psychiatrist to declare her insane. John Hinkley came from a prominent family and has now a free man after trying to assassinate the President, wounding him and three others and spent his sentence in a hospital. She's facing a minimum of 15 years in prison and could be sentenced to life in prison. She might as well expend her wealth on trying to escape this fate, as it won't benefit her in prison. If Hinkley can get out from under trying to assassinate the President, then it's not beyond the pale to think that Hoppe can not do the same with these charges. There aren't any victims in Hoppe's case. It's all based on her state of mind.

The posts I’ve seen are from people hypothesizing that she might be manic depressive. I’ve not seen anyone post that the knew this to be true, were aware of her having received therapy, or even stating what she was like when she was younger.

There are people on this thread who claimed to have known her biblically when younger, who had sex with her repeatedly and a poster who described a particular act she was known for, you must not have read those posts describing what she was like when younger.

This is not the only message board where locals or those who knew E or J at some point are discussing the charges, including someone close to the family during the divorce. It has been stated that she had diagnoses of bipolar and depression. I'm sure more will come out in further court filings.

Bipolar typically involves medication, not just therapy and many are non-compliant. It is commonly linked to hypersexuality which she was arguably displaying in college and certainly in 2018 and 2019 with divorce filings talking about her pursuing sex with men and women online, bringing a man back to the marital home with the young kids present and the public sex in a park.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hoppe's only hope is to be found not guilty by reason of insanity and spend a few years in mental hospital and be declared rehabilitated and then released.

I think you may be unpleasantly surprised at how the "justice system" works for the wealthy and connected.

At least the widespread publicity will come up in a Google search and may curtail a bit her access to IRL victims.

She's got connections in Virginia, but that may not translate to Federal court and her demographics may work against her at the Federal level. A Caucasian Disney Princess sentenced to a decade in Federal prison without any dispensation would feed the appetite of Critical Race Theory advocates.

That's not a thing in federal district court, especially DDC. She'll get offered a plea based on the facts of the case. If no plea, she'll get a trial before a jury of people from the DC pool. She'll be sentenced based on the sentencing guidelines. Neither the US Attorney nor the judge will GAF who her parents are/were, and even if the criminal defense attorney is well respected, that won't make a difference (although of course her case will be better presented if the person is good). There will probably be some sympathy among both the USAO office and the DDC judges for her ex, who is probably a couple degrees of separation from them ....so that might weight a tiny bit in favor of trying to get a plea that will keep this whole mess out of the public eye any more than it has to be.

The enticement charge has a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years, but it's somewhat less explicit than the photos and transporting a minor charges. I think the government would drop the other charges in exchange for a guilty plea for the enticement charge. Ten years in prison is a long time, so she may choose to spend every last nickel on trying for a not guilty by reason of insanity verdict, since it seems like she has some mental health issues.

Where is the evidence that she has mental health issues? Or mental health issues outside of those anyone who wants to molest kids would have?

From previous comments in this thread from those who claim to know her and her family. She may have documented evidence of being treated by a psychiatrist and can most certainly pay a psychiatrist to declare her insane. John Hinkley came from a prominent family and has now a free man after trying to assassinate the President, wounding him and three others and spent his sentence in a hospital. She's facing a minimum of 15 years in prison and could be sentenced to life in prison. She might as well expend her wealth on trying to escape this fate, as it won't benefit her in prison. If Hinkley can get out from under trying to assassinate the President, then it's not beyond the pale to think that Hoppe can not do the same with these charges. There aren't any victims in Hoppe's case. It's all based on her state of mind.

The posts I’ve seen are from people hypothesizing that she might be manic depressive. I’ve not seen anyone post that the knew this to be true, were aware of her having received therapy, or even stating what she was like when she was younger.

There are people on this thread who claimed to have known her biblically when younger, who had sex with her repeatedly and a poster who described a particular act she was known for, you must not have read those posts describing what she was like when younger.

This is not the only message board where locals or those who knew E or J at some point are discussing the charges, including someone close to the family during the divorce. It has been stated that she had diagnoses of bipolar and depression. I'm sure more will come out in further court filings.

Bipolar typically involves medication, not just therapy and many are non-compliant. It is commonly linked to hypersexuality which she was arguably displaying in college and certainly in 2018 and 2019 with divorce filings talking about her pursuing sex with men and women online, bringing a man back to the marital home with the young kids present and the public sex in a park.

Where has this been posted? I’ve looked at other message boards, but haven’t seen postings from anyone who claims to have known her.

[Anonymous]

There were a lot of early posts on Reddit the same day this thread was started, as one example. Some threads may have been closed but posts may be up. I mean, who knows? More will come out in the future public court filings.

IRL terms, if anyone you know who is married starts soliciting both genders for sex online and brings strangers back to the marital home dtf with the young kids home or who strips off and has sex in a park, get them to a psychiatrist to be screened for bipolar, it's classic hypersexuality/mania. I learned on this thread that MS can also cause mania. She could have had several different factors, including csa. But none of those things is an excuse for preying on kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is she actually wealthy? It does not seem so.

+1

She really doesn’t come across as the wealthy “socialite” the press is portraying her as. Her father and brother don’t even work for Hunton, Andrews, Kurth. They work for their own small practices.

I really wish someone who is familiar with the family would speak to this.

Not sure if you are asking for someone to speak to the reasoning behind her father & brother not working at Hunton, Andrews, Kurth or whether or not she truly is a wealthy "socialite," but as someone who grew up in Richmond & went to school with them, here's my input/two cents:

Her family was certainly wealthy in many aspects for Richmond. They lived in a large Colonial-style house on Three Chopt Rd which was right next to St. Catherine's and across the street from the Country Club of Virginia (CCV) (if you don't know anything about RVA, the area they lived in is a lot like Alexandria & the Belle Heaven Country Club area). Their house was decorated very nicely & kept up well (housekeepers, maids, gardeners, etc.). They drove nice cars (Mercedes, brand new Grand Jeep Cherokee on a 16th birthday), and they had nice clothes. Both kids went to private schools (St. Catherine's & St. Christopher's) from K-12 and then went to multiple colleges, some of which were not cheap. They were members of CCV and the Commonwealth Club. They did cotillion, hosted and attended sweet sixteen parties, didn't miss a ski weekend or beach week (Richmond school thing), etc., and Eleanor was a debutante. Does that classify her as a "socialite"? Maybe. I guess it depends on how you define socialite. But I also think the media knows how to get people to click, so their choice of words is deliberate.

So yes - they were wealthy. I say "were" because I have no clue what their financial standing is now, but I highly doubt much has changed. (I mean, I just looked up the house Eleanor and Eppa VI grew up in on Zillow, and it looks like it sold for over $1.5MM not that long ago, so...)

This is an old Virginia family with multiple generations of "Eppas" who have made an impact on everything from politics to businesses to universities, and a lot of wealth comes with that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eppa_Hunton
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eppa_Hunton_Jr.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eppa_Hunton_IV


As to why neither Eppa V (dad) nor Eppa VI (brother) works for Hunton, Andrews, Kurth - My understanding is that there was a nepotism clause put in place way back when it was Hunton & Williams. So only two generations of Eppa's worked there - Eppa III (aka Eppa Jr.), who started the firm, and Eppa IV, who was Eleanor's grandfather.
I don't even think Eppa VI lives in Richmond anymore, but I may be wrong about that.

[Anonymous]

The brother lives in the sticks and doesn’t have the best reputation then or now.

[Anonymous]

It is not that easy to get an adult family member suffering from a manic episode ti see a dr. Ask me how I know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hoppe's only hope is to be found not guilty by reason of insanity and spend a few years in mental hospital and be declared rehabilitated and then released.

I think you may be unpleasantly surprised at how the "justice system" works for the wealthy and connected.

At least the widespread publicity will come up in a Google search and may curtail a bit her access to IRL victims.

She's got connections in Virginia, but that may not translate to Federal court and her demographics may work against her at the Federal level. A Caucasian Disney Princess sentenced to a decade in Federal prison without any dispensation would feed the appetite of Critical Race Theory advocates.

That's not a thing in federal district court, especially DDC. She'll get offered a plea based on the facts of the case. If no plea, she'll get a trial before a jury of people from the DC pool. She'll be sentenced based on the sentencing guidelines. Neither the US Attorney nor the judge will GAF who her parents are/were, and even if the criminal defense attorney is well respected, that won't make a difference (although of course her case will be better presented if the person is good). There will probably be some sympathy among both the USAO office and the DDC judges for her ex, who is probably a couple degrees of separation from them ....so that might weight a tiny bit in favor of trying to get a plea that will keep this whole mess out of the public eye any more than it has to be.

The enticement charge has a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years, but it's somewhat less explicit than the photos and transporting a minor charges. I think the government would drop the other charges in exchange for a guilty plea for the enticement charge. Ten years in prison is a long time, so she may choose to spend every last nickel on trying for a not guilty by reason of insanity verdict, since it seems like she has some mental health issues.

Where is the evidence that she has mental health issues? Or mental health issues outside of those anyone who wants to molest kids would have?

From previous comments in this thread from those who claim to know her and her family. She may have documented evidence of being treated by a psychiatrist and can most certainly pay a psychiatrist to declare her insane. John Hinkley came from a prominent family and has now a free man after trying to assassinate the President, wounding him and three others and spent his sentence in a hospital. She's facing a minimum of 15 years in prison and could be sentenced to life in prison. She might as well expend her wealth on trying to escape this fate, as it won't benefit her in prison. If Hinkley can get out from under trying to assassinate the President, then it's not beyond the pale to think that Hoppe can not do the same with these charges. There aren't any victims in Hoppe's case. It's all based on her state of mind.

the kids who were abused in the photos/videos Hoppe shared w the UC agent are real people and they are victims.

+1 the feds will nail her on the CSAM related charges.

[Anonymous]

It is utterly grim how many of these people are out there.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/spider-man-window-washer-gets-100-years-for-taking-pornographic-images-of-children-he-babysat

And Epstein showed little social sanction even when he was released from prison.

Hopefully EHH will have a serious legal consequence but would not be surprised if it is bargained down given her resources.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hoppe's only hope is to be found not guilty by reason of insanity and spend a few years in mental hospital and be declared rehabilitated and then released.

I think you may be unpleasantly surprised at how the "justice system" works for the wealthy and connected.

At least the widespread publicity will come up in a Google search and may curtail a bit her access to IRL victims.

She's got connections in Virginia, but that may not translate to Federal court and her demographics may work against her at the Federal level. A Caucasian Disney Princess sentenced to a decade in Federal prison without any dispensation would feed the appetite of Critical Race Theory advocates.

That's not a thing in federal district court, especially DDC. She'll get offered a plea based on the facts of the case. If no plea, she'll get a trial before a jury of people from the DC pool. She'll be sentenced based on the sentencing guidelines. Neither the US Attorney nor the judge will GAF who her parents are/were, and even if the criminal defense attorney is well respected, that won't make a difference (although of course her case will be better presented if the person is good). There will probably be some sympathy among both the USAO office and the DDC judges for her ex, who is probably a couple degrees of separation from them ....so that might weight a tiny bit in favor of trying to get a plea that will keep this whole mess out of the public eye any more than it has to be.

The enticement charge has a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years, but it's somewhat less explicit than the photos and transporting a minor charges. I think the government would drop the other charges in exchange for a guilty plea for the enticement charge. Ten years in prison is a long time, so she may choose to spend every last nickel on trying for a not guilty by reason of insanity verdict, since it seems like she has some mental health issues.

Where is the evidence that she has mental health issues? Or mental health issues outside of those anyone who wants to molest kids would have?

From previous comments in this thread from those who claim to know her and her family. She may have documented evidence of being treated by a psychiatrist and can most certainly pay a psychiatrist to declare her insane. John Hinkley came from a prominent family and has now a free man after trying to assassinate the President, wounding him and three others and spent his sentence in a hospital. She's facing a minimum of 15 years in prison and could be sentenced to life in prison. She might as well expend her wealth on trying to escape this fate, as it won't benefit her in prison. If Hinkley can get out from under trying to assassinate the President, then it's not beyond the pale to think that Hoppe can not do the same with these charges. There aren't any victims in Hoppe's case. It's all based on her state of mind.

the kids who were abused in the photos/videos Hoppe shared w the UC agent are real people and they are victims.

I agree, but, unless there is a direct connection between Hoppe and the person who produced those photos or Hoppe, herself, produced those photos, the victim's testimony would not be relevant to this case. On the otherhand, if Hoppe is connected, she could spend the rest of her life in prison.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For everyone saying that mental illness can equal legal insanity, they do not know the incredible threshold for insanity. Someone in the midst of a psychotic or delusional episode may not even be insane if they acted in a way that they knew what they did was wrong:flee a scene, hide from the cops, lie about what happened. It's a very very high standard that most mentally ill people would never be able to meet.

Hoppe's family has enormous wealth which makes all things possible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A good lawyer knows the law a great lawyer knows the Judge. Once the trial judge is revealed, a lawyer who knows the Judge will be hired to represent Eleanor.

As a lawyer, although not criminal defense, I see this as quite likely. The PD was a placeholder.

I do wonder about what seemed like PR posts re: the family's relief that she was locked up. Then Epa was offered as a 3rd party custodian. Must just have been a troll.

I hope she will be ordered held somewhere for a very long time, even St. E's.

The + of the publicity is that she will no longer pass background checks to be near kids, finally.

The - of the publicity is the impact on those poor kids. Genuinely hope they are relocated, and last name is changed.

I think the investigation into her actions will be curtailed to this incident with a lot of strings pulled and favors called in.

Once the parents are no longer on earth, perhaps then her level of consequences will be higher.

Anthony Weiner was trying to entice youngsters on social media and he was offered a plea bargain of pleading guilty to one count of sending obscene material and spent 21 months in a prison hospital, but the explicit details of his interactions were never made public and apparently he never showed up at their doorstep, but there were actual victims, not undercover law enforecment.

I posted above but my impression is that the cases with real victims rarely go to trial because they don’t want to force kids to testify. So prosecutors will take a plea deal that gives the guy a criminal history and a spot of the sex offender registry and likely a Google profile that Alerts others, so at least he can never be around kids again. I looked up a neighbor on the registry (and found the associated news articles)—be molested a kid who mowed his lawn, and did little to no time. I think they’ll be somewhat less likely to offer a great plea on this since there are no kids to testify. Would love to hear from some prosecutors.

Real victims do testify unless they are wealthy like Hoppe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is she actually wealthy? It does not seem so.

+1

She really doesn’t come across as the wealthy “socialite” the press is portraying her as. Her father and brother don’t even work for Hunton, Andrews, Kurth. They work for their own small practices.

I really wish someone who is familiar with the family would speak to this.

Not sure if you are asking for someone to speak to the reasoning behind her father & brother not working at Hunton, Andrews, Kurth or whether or not she truly is a wealthy "socialite," but as someone who grew up in Richmond & went to school with them, here's my input/two cents:

Her family was certainly wealthy in many aspects for Richmond. They lived in a large Colonial-style house on Three Chopt Rd which was right next to St. Catherine's and across the street from the Country Club of Virginia (CCV) (if you don't know anything about RVA, the area they lived in is a lot like Alexandria & the Belle Heaven Country Club area). Their house was decorated very nicely & kept up well (housekeepers, maids, gardeners, etc.). They drove nice cars (Mercedes, brand new Grand Jeep Cherokee on a 16th birthday), and they had nice clothes. Both kids went to private schools (St. Catherine's & St. Christopher's) from K-12 and then went to multiple colleges, some of which were not cheap. They were members of CCV and the Commonwealth Club. They did cotillion, hosted and attended sweet sixteen parties, didn't miss a ski weekend or beach week (Richmond school thing), etc., and Eleanor was a debutante. Does that classify her as a "socialite"? Maybe. I guess it depends on how you define socialite. But I also think the media knows how to get people to click, so their choice of words is deliberate.

So yes - they were wealthy. I say "were" because I have no clue what their financial standing is now, but I highly doubt much has changed. (I mean, I just looked up the house Eleanor and Eppa VI grew up in on Zillow, and it looks like it sold for over $1.5MM not that long ago, so...)

This is an old Virginia family with multiple generations of "Eppas" who have made an impact on everything from politics to businesses to universities, and a lot of wealth comes with that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eppa_Hunton
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eppa_Hunton_Jr.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eppa_Hunton_IV


As to why neither Eppa V (dad) nor Eppa VI (brother) works for Hunton, Andrews, Kurth - My understanding is that there was a nepotism clause put in place way back when it was Hunton & Williams. So only two generations of Eppa's worked there - Eppa III (aka Eppa Jr.), who started the firm, and Eppa IV, who was Eleanor's grandfather.
I don't even think Eppa VI lives in Richmond anymore, but I may be wrong about that.

It sounds like they were privileged, but not wealthy. Being a law firm partner, even a law firm founder, is great, but you don't make millions upon exiting. And back in his day he probably didn't make that much period. It was a good living but not CEO level money. There are no stock options. All the private schools, trips, etc are pretty standard UMC/UC activities. Happens here too, but it's cheaper in Richmond. As an example, the upper school at St Catherine's is $30k/year while DC privates are $60k. If they had maids, gardeners, etc. they may well have been overspending.

Agree that Hunton likely has an antinepotism policy but usually that just means you can't have related people active in the firm, or sometimes active in the partnership. So the dad or son could theoretically join the firm but my guess is they aren't Hunton material.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is she actually wealthy? It does not seem so.

+1

She really doesn’t come across as the wealthy “socialite” the press is portraying her as. Her father and brother don’t even work for Hunton, Andrews, Kurth. They work for their own small practices.

I really wish someone who is familiar with the family would speak to this.

Not sure if you are asking for someone to speak to the reasoning behind her father & brother not working at Hunton, Andrews, Kurth or whether or not she truly is a wealthy "socialite," but as someone who grew up in Richmond & went to school with them, here's my input/two cents:

Her family was certainly wealthy in many aspects for Richmond. They lived in a large Colonial-style house on Three Chopt Rd which was right next to St. Catherine's and across the street from the Country Club of Virginia (CCV) (if you don't know anything about RVA, the area they lived in is a lot like Alexandria & the Belle Heaven Country Club area). Their house was decorated very nicely & kept up well (housekeepers, maids, gardeners, etc.). They drove nice cars (Mercedes, brand new Grand Jeep Cherokee on a 16th birthday), and they had nice clothes. Both kids went to private schools (St. Catherine's & St. Christopher's) from K-12 and then went to multiple colleges, some of which were not cheap. They were members of CCV and the Commonwealth Club. They did cotillion, hosted and attended sweet sixteen parties, didn't miss a ski weekend or beach week (Richmond school thing), etc., and Eleanor was a debutante. Does that classify her as a "socialite"? Maybe. I guess it depends on how you define socialite. But I also think the media knows how to get people to click, so their choice of words is deliberate.

So yes - they were wealthy. I say "were" because I have no clue what their financial standing is now, but I highly doubt much has changed. (I mean, I just looked up the house Eleanor and Eppa VI grew up in on Zillow, and it looks like it sold for over $1.5MM not that long ago, so...)

This is an old Virginia family with multiple generations of "Eppas" who have made an impact on everything from politics to businesses to universities, and a lot of wealth comes with that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eppa_Hunton
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eppa_Hunton_Jr.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eppa_Hunton_IV


As to why neither Eppa V (dad) nor Eppa VI (brother) works for Hunton, Andrews, Kurth - My understanding is that there was a nepotism clause put in place way back when it was Hunton & Williams. So only two generations of Eppa's worked there - Eppa III (aka Eppa Jr.), who started the firm, and Eppa IV, who was Eleanor's grandfather.
I don't even think Eppa VI lives in Richmond anymore, but I may be wrong about that.

It sounds like they were privileged, but not wealthy. Being a law firm partner, even a law firm founder, is great, but you don't make millions upon exiting. And back in his day he probably didn't make that much period. It was a good living but not CEO level money. There are no stock options. All the private schools, trips, etc are pretty standard UMC/UC activities. Happens here too, but it's cheaper in Richmond. As an example, the upper school at St Catherine's is $30k/year while DC privates are $60k. If they had maids, gardeners, etc. they may well have been overspending.

Agree that Hunton likely has an antinepotism policy but usually that just means you can't have related people active in the firm, or sometimes active in the partnership. So the dad or son could theoretically join the firm but my guess is they aren't Hunton material.

Eppa Hoppe V must have some kind of gravitas to get the Chesterfield Commonwealth's Attorney to roll over and accept that Eleanor's undressing at Pocahontas State park was just some random nudity and didn't involve anyone else and let her serve 25 hours of community service and for the assistant manager who contacted the police, who is now a full manager at another state park, to claim he can't comment on the incident.