ECNL moving to school year not calendar

[Anonymous]

Would love all these big club announcements listed here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's funny how passionate some people are about changing the cutoff date from Jan 1 to Sept 1 or Aug 1. Yes it allows some (but not all) players to be on teams with their classmates. It does nothing for RAE. You're just advantaging/disadvantaging different groups of players depending on when they were born.

If you're not going to completely address all the trapped players with something like SY+60 the juice doesn't seem worth the squeeze.

The most interested are the trapped players currently. I don't know if it's "passionate," but more just curious (i.e., shit or get off the pot - you brought this up now actually do/say something about it!)

So the most interested are the ones that would be the most advantaged by being allowed to "play down" an age group.

This doesn't seem like the group that should be making the decision or even commenting on it. The words conflict of interest come to mind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's funny how passionate some people are about changing the cutoff date from Jan 1 to Sept 1 or Aug 1. Yes it allows some (but not all) players to be on teams with their classmates. It does nothing for RAE. You're just advantaging/disadvantaging different groups of players depending on when they were born.

If you're not going to completely address all the trapped players with something like SY+60 the juice doesn't seem worth the squeeze.

The most interested are the trapped players currently. I don't know if it's "passionate," but more just curious (i.e., shit or get off the pot - you brought this up now actually do/say something about it!)

So the most interested are the ones that would be the most advantaged by being allowed to "play down" an age group.

This doesn't seem like the group that should be making the decision or even commenting on it. The words conflict of interest come to mind.

Huh? Who is making a decision? You think a forum is making this decision? And what do you mean by commenting on it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's funny how passionate some people are about changing the cutoff date from Jan 1 to Sept 1 or Aug 1. Yes it allows some (but not all) players to be on teams with their classmates. It does nothing for RAE. You're just advantaging/disadvantaging different groups of players depending on when they were born.

If you're not going to completely address all the trapped players with something like SY+60 the juice doesn't seem worth the squeeze.

The most interested are the trapped players currently. I don't know if it's "passionate," but more just curious (i.e., shit or get off the pot - you brought this up now actually do/say something about it!)

So the most interested are the ones that would be the most advantaged by being allowed to "play down" an age group.

This doesn't seem like the group that should be making the decision or even commenting on it. The words conflict of interest come to mind.

Huh? Who is making a decision? You think a forum is making this decision? And what do you mean by commenting on it?

Don't you know that US Soccer have been monitoring this thread and are basing their decision off of the consensus on here?

[Anonymous]

🤣

[Anonymous]

Its been released!

ECNL, etc will be going SY (9/1) GA/MLSN staying BY. This will be a cluster!!

Wonder what local USYS leagues, etc will do

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone on the us soccer board of directors meeting on YouTube? Would love a summary

They will fill us in on registration after the youth council meeting this afternoon. Then the fun can begin here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Its been released!

ECNL, etc will be going SY (9/1) GA/MLSN staying BY. This will be a cluster!!

Wonder what local USYS leagues, etc will do

Do you have a link to your source?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Its been released!

ECNL, etc will be going SY (9/1) GA/MLSN staying BY. This will be a cluster!!

Wonder what local USYS leagues, etc will do

USYS will go SY, they've pretty much already said that, and were the main drivers behind the push, as they run basically all the "rec" leagues. (I know I know its not rec but it sort of is rec)

[Anonymous]

Where is this released?

[Anonymous]

MLSN competition tier announced for revolution

[Anonymous]

https://varevolution.com/news/virginia-revolution-joins-mls-next-elevating-national-boys-program-for-fall-2025/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Where is this released?

I can't find anything on it. The youth council meets at 3:30 today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Its been released!

ECNL, etc will be going SY (9/1) GA/MLSN staying BY. This will be a cluster!!

Wonder what local USYS leagues, etc will do

Where can we see this information

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its been released!

ECNL, etc will be going SY (9/1) GA/MLSN staying BY. This will be a cluster!!

Wonder what local USYS leagues, etc will do

Where can we see this information

Spam.