Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:ECNL directors are saying no change for 25/26.
Is anyone actually confirming the change for 26/27?
Hahaha this is the real question.
If MLSN + GA keep pulling over clubs and they stay BY it will be difficult for ECNL to do SY.
You understand this is bigger than ECNL, GA, and MLSN jockying. The removal of the mandate impacts all of the feeder systems into those leagues. Which is arguably bigger when you consider who will even be considered for these "top" leagues.
Here's the truth that people won't tell you about BY vs SY.
When players are younger it does matter when they were born. Kids grow fast and when they're younger 6 months means more mature, better able to handle the ball, etc. However once they hit u14/u15 girls are 90% done growing. You know which ones are going to have a physical advantage and which ones won't.
What this means is BY or SY doesn't really matter once players hit puberty and it definately doesn't matter once players are u17.
Here's another weird thing you wouldn't expect. The early developers tend to get career ending njuries like ACL tears in HS while later maturing players get injuries in college or even later in life. These are things coaches are looking for that parents don't expect. If a kids on crutches as a junior in hs there's a good chance they'll reinjure themself playing in college.