new Reade/Biden thread

[Anonymous]

Ms. Reade’s story has more holes than a sieve.

[Anonymous]

Has no bearing in her claims.

Yes, it does. If you are willing to break the law, you are also willing to lie. Criminals don't deserve the same treatment as non criminals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can you even imagine if Christine Blasey Ford has committed check fraud then been fired from Kavanaugh’s chambers? Yeah but it’s exactly the same right.

Huh?

DP. This is a great analogy. The point is, someone commits check fraud, gets fired over it, and then accuses their boss of instead firing them over sexual assault.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Has no bearing in her claims.

Yes, it does. If you are willing to break the law, you are also willing to lie. Criminals don't deserve the same treatment as non criminals.

Can you cite that in the rules of evidence?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Has no bearing in her claims.

Yes, it does. If you are willing to break the law, you are also willing to lie. Criminals don't deserve the same treatment as non criminals.

Can you cite that in the rules of evidence?
There are no rules of evidence when it comesto determining credibility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Has no bearing in her claims.

Yes, it does. If you are willing to break the law, you are also willing to lie. Criminals don't deserve the same treatment as non criminals.

Agree. She was willing to write rubber checks
You can write a check and have it bounce because you're a penny short but not if the check goes through twice! She has lied so many times that she must be related to Trump!

[Anonymous]

Dianne Feinstein is a hypocrite

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dianne Feinstein is a hypocrite

As is every other Democrat in Congress who believes Joe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Has no bearing in her claims.

Yes, it does. If you are willing to break the law, you are also willing to lie. Criminals don't deserve the same treatment as non criminals.

Can you cite that in the rules of evidence?

There are no rules of evidence when it comesto determining credibility.

Indeed there are, relating to prior acts.

[Anonymous]

So, she has stated a claim. Some people question her assertion, based on alleged inconsistencies, lack of direct corroboration, Biden’s denials, and an apparent check issue.

Biden has said it never happened and has pointed to the apparent lack of a complaint. Biden has allegedly exaggerated some things in the past, such as his academic record and South Africa. Video evidence of swearing-in ceremonies suggests he has invaded the personal space of females on some occasions. He
discussed that some time ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, she has stated a claim. Some people question her assertion, based on alleged inconsistencies, lack of direct corroboration, Biden’s denials, and an apparent check issue.

Biden has said it never happened and has pointed to the apparent lack of a complaint. Biden has allegedly exaggerated some things in the past, such as his academic record and South Africa. Video evidence of swearing-in ceremonies suggests he has invaded the personal space of females on some occasions. He
discussed that some time ago.

Her inconsistencies are not “alleged.” She has 3-4 stories about what supposedly happened, and 3-4 stories about why she left Biden’s office. Her own words.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, she has stated a claim. Some people question her assertion, based on alleged inconsistencies, lack of direct corroboration, Biden’s denials, and an apparent check issue.

Biden has said it never happened and has pointed to the apparent lack of a complaint. Biden has allegedly exaggerated some things in the past, such as his academic record and South Africa. Video evidence of swearing-in ceremonies suggests he has invaded the personal space of females on some occasions. He
discussed that some time ago.

Her inconsistencies are not “alleged.” She has 3-4 stories about what supposedly happened, and 3-4 stories about why she left Biden’s office. Her own words.

DP. It’s also not just a check issue. She stole from a nonprofit for pregnant horses and the nonprofit has the receipts. She started multiple Go Fund Me’s for various people and a horse that ultimately benefited herself. She made up weird random lies for no reason, like how her journalist/PR dad was a “powerful defense contractor.” And how she was on the Junior Olympic ski team—at a time when that didn’t exist. She’s a serial litigant for sexual abuse and racial discrimination (against her as a white woman).

[Anonymous]

^^^ pp again. You can see receipts and webshots and other docs here: http://ascammersnightmareisjustice.blogspot.com/2020/04/tara-reade-legacy-of-lies-part-one.html?m=1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, she has stated a claim. Some people question her assertion, based on alleged inconsistencies, lack of direct corroboration, Biden’s denials, and an apparent check issue.

Biden has said it never happened and has pointed to the apparent lack of a complaint. Biden has allegedly exaggerated some things in the past, such as his academic record and South Africa. Video evidence of swearing-in ceremonies suggests he has invaded the personal space of females on some occasions. He
discussed that some time ago.

Her inconsistencies are not “alleged.” She has 3-4 stories about what supposedly happened, and 3-4 stories about why she left Biden’s office. Her own words.

DP. It’s also not just a check issue. She stole from a nonprofit for pregnant horses and the nonprofit has the receipts. She started multiple Go Fund Me’s for various people and a horse that ultimately benefited herself. She made up weird random lies for no reason, like how her journalist/PR dad was a “powerful defense contractor.” And how she was on the Junior Olympic ski team—at a time when that didn’t exist. She’s a serial litigant for sexual abuse and racial discrimination (against her as a white woman).

Have you seen these "receipts?"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, she has stated a claim. Some people question her assertion, based on alleged inconsistencies, lack of direct corroboration, Biden’s denials, and an apparent check issue.

Biden has said it never happened and has pointed to the apparent lack of a complaint. Biden has allegedly exaggerated some things in the past, such as his academic record and South Africa. Video evidence of swearing-in ceremonies suggests he has invaded the personal space of females on some occasions. He
discussed that some time ago.

Her inconsistencies are not “alleged.” She has 3-4 stories about what supposedly happened, and 3-4 stories about why she left Biden’s office. Her own words.

DP. It’s also not just a check issue. She stole from a nonprofit for pregnant horses and the nonprofit has the receipts. She started multiple Go Fund Me’s for various people and a horse that ultimately benefited herself. She made up weird random lies for no reason, like how her journalist/PR dad was a “powerful defense contractor.” And how she was on the Junior Olympic ski team—at a time when that didn’t exist. She’s a serial litigant for sexual abuse and racial discrimination (against her as a white woman).

Have you seen these "receipts?"

http://ascammersnightmareisjustice.blogspot.com/2020/04/tara-reade-legacy-of-lies-part-one.html?m=1

Scroll down to the bill from Steinbeck Equine Clinic and the subsequent emails where Reade admits to this and agrees to pay the nonprofit back, although apparently she never did.

As you scroll down, you’ll pass what the blogger thinks is apparently bankruptcy fraud, for misrepresenting her debts.