2029 Girls

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You forgot that they won’t have that ranking after the summer. The subject year of the thread for M&D DC

Why would anyone want to be on a team with a parent like this?

So much hate for a group of hard working 8th grade girls you pray your daughter plays with next season. You keep telling them to go to Capital and then show the culture they would be joining.

[Anonymous]

MDDC has a good 29 team but are they doing anything for their younger teams? They built the 29 team by recruiting talent from other clubs. They will have to do the same for their younger teams because they aren't very good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MDDC has a good 29 team but are they doing anything for their younger teams? They built the 29 team by recruiting talent from other clubs. They will have to do the same for their younger teams because they aren't very good.

The 29 NL team was top 25 for two years before those other girls showed up. They didn’t just merge together on accident however the combination, like what has happened when the girls go to Capital in HS, has been an early indicator of the future potential of the 29 girls in the area.

Your point with the other age groups is accurate and the organization won’t be able to survive off of the succes of one team. Especially with the growth of club programs in the Bethesda area.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You forgot that they won’t have that ranking after the summer. The subject year of the thread for M&D DC

Why would anyone want to be on a team with a parent like this?

So much hate for a group of hard working 8th grade girls you pray your daughter plays with next season. You keep telling them to go to Capital and then show the culture they would be joining.

Best example of acolytes I've seen since Jim Jones. 8th graders. And you misspelled parents plural. Anyone wading into that culture if they did a smidge of homework deserves it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MDDC has a good 29 team but are they doing anything for their younger teams? They built the 29 team by recruiting talent from other clubs. They will have to do the same for their younger teams because they aren't very good.

The 29 NL team was top 25 for two years before those other girls showed up. They didn’t just merge together on accident however the combination, like what has happened when the girls go to Capital in HS, has been an early indicator of the future potential of the 29 girls in the area.

Your point with the other age groups is accurate and the organization won’t be able to survive off of the succes of one team. Especially with the growth of club programs in the Bethesda area.

They were #10 2 years ago, and 15 last year, but nice try. And they had done it with a smaller roster, to provide the room to supplement.

If anyone cares about the brand going forward (and I'd assume M&D does), they will of course need to shore up other ages. THAT's why the tryouts are important in July and "the most antiipated ever" in someone's words. Not for the 29s. You guys got to up your troll game.

[Anonymous]

Can someone please tell me how the culture, families, and coaches are at MnDDC? I really want to know..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MDDC has a good 29 team but are they doing anything for their younger teams? They built the 29 team by recruiting talent from other clubs. They will have to do the same for their younger teams because they aren't very good.

The 29 NL team was top 25 for two years before those other girls showed up. They didn’t just merge together on accident however the combination, like what has happened when the girls go to Capital in HS, has been an early indicator of the future potential of the 29 girls in the area.

Your point with the other age groups is accurate and the organization won’t be able to survive off of the succes of one team. Especially with the growth of club programs in the Bethesda area.

They were #10 2 years ago, and 15 last year, but nice try. And they had done it with a smaller roster, to provide the room to supplement.

If anyone cares about the brand going forward (and I'd assume M&D does), they will of course need to shore up other ages. THAT's why the tryouts are important in July and "the most antiipated ever" in someone's words. Not for the 29s. You guys got to up your troll game.

Hence the top 25 comment, easy pal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MDDC has a good 29 team but are they doing anything for their younger teams? They built the 29 team by recruiting talent from other clubs. They will have to do the same for their younger teams because they aren't very good.

The 29 NL team was top 25 for two years before those other girls showed up. They didn’t just merge together on accident however the combination, like what has happened when the girls go to Capital in HS, has been an early indicator of the future potential of the 29 girls in the area.

Your point with the other age groups is accurate and the organization won’t be able to survive off of the succes of one team. Especially with the growth of club programs in the Bethesda area.

They were #10 2 years ago, and 15 last year, but nice try. And they had done it with a smaller roster, to provide the room to supplement.

If anyone cares about the brand going forward (and I'd assume M&D does), they will of course need to shore up other ages. THAT's why the tryouts are important in July and "the most antiipated ever" in someone's words. Not for the 29s. You guys got to up your troll game.

Hence the top 25 comment, easy pal.

You meant to say top 15, and we're not pals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MDDC has a good 29 team but are they doing anything for their younger teams? They built the 29 team by recruiting talent from other clubs. They will have to do the same for their younger teams because they aren't very good.

The 29 NL team was top 25 for two years before those other girls showed up. They didn’t just merge together on accident however the combination, like what has happened when the girls go to Capital in HS, has been an early indicator of the future potential of the 29 girls in the area.

Your point with the other age groups is accurate and the organization won’t be able to survive off of the succes of one team. Especially with the growth of club programs in the Bethesda area.

They were #10 2 years ago, and 15 last year, but nice try. And they had done it with a smaller roster, to provide the room to supplement.

If anyone cares about the brand going forward (and I'd assume M&D does), they will of course need to shore up other ages. THAT's why the tryouts are important in July and "the most antiipated ever" in someone's words. Not for the 29s. You guys got to up your troll game.

Hence the top 25 comment, easy pal.

You meant to say top 15, and we're not pals.

That answers the parent culture at DC, thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MDDC has a good 29 team but are they doing anything for their younger teams? They built the 29 team by recruiting talent from other clubs. They will have to do the same for their younger teams because they aren't very good.

The 29 NL team was top 25 for two years before those other girls showed up. They didn’t just merge together on accident however the combination, like what has happened when the girls go to Capital in HS, has been an early indicator of the future potential of the 29 girls in the area.

Your point with the other age groups is accurate and the organization won’t be able to survive off of the succes of one team. Especially with the growth of club programs in the Bethesda area.

They were #10 2 years ago, and 15 last year, but nice try. And they had done it with a smaller roster, to provide the room to supplement.

If anyone cares about the brand going forward (and I'd assume M&D does), they will of course need to shore up other ages. THAT's why the tryouts are important in July and "the most antiipated ever" in someone's words. Not for the 29s. You guys got to up your troll game.

Hence the top 25 comment, easy pal.

You meant to say top 15, and we're not pals.

That answers the parent culture at DC, thank you.

Yes, thank you. Honest and direct. A lot better than narratives, passive aggressiveness and holier than thou attitudes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MDDC has a good 29 team but are they doing anything for their younger teams? They built the 29 team by recruiting talent from other clubs. They will have to do the same for their younger teams because they aren't very good.

The 29 NL team was top 25 for two years before those other girls showed up. They didn’t just merge together on accident however the combination, like what has happened when the girls go to Capital in HS, has been an early indicator of the future potential of the 29 girls in the area.

Your point with the other age groups is accurate and the organization won’t be able to survive off of the succes of one team. Especially with the growth of club programs in the Bethesda area.

They were #10 2 years ago, and 15 last year, but nice try. And they had done it with a smaller roster, to provide the room to supplement.

If anyone cares about the brand going forward (and I'd assume M&D does), they will of course need to shore up other ages. THAT's why the tryouts are important in July and "the most antiipated ever" in someone's words. Not for the 29s. You guys got to up your troll game.

Hence the top 25 comment, easy pal.

You meant to say top 15, and we're not pals.

That answers the parent culture at DC, thank you.

Not at all involved with M&D in the least. I did misread the PPs post, who and what he/she was replying to. So mea culpa there. When anyone goes with pal (could've corrected me and said we were actually in agreement), generally in 2025 internet world, it's an eye for an eye love tap. So a nothingburger compared to the typical motivations on this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes it’s posted, same day as Capital and free registration for everyone.

free for everyone b/c they charge 4k a year, way more than other clubs.

M&D (including M&D DC) costs $4k a year?

M&D does not cost $4,000 a year.

M&D DC DOES cost apporx 4k for my daughter. I am not seeing the ROI with mediocre coaching.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Big game this weekend between MndDC and HG. DC can make a big statement with a win here.

Ha! Next Level will get boat raced

Stop by and say hi at the race on your way out. Join the funeral as the brand dies.

HG is big girl real lacrosse. Not the pay someone a bunch of money to train my daughter to be good DMV nonsense.

Hero's has no players on the rosters of the top three D1 teams that will vie for the national championship.

Capital has three players on these teams. One starts for BC, another has played in 12 games this year at Northwestern (as a sophomore).

In fairness, 24 players have played 12 or more games at NW, most more than that, and 7 played 8 games or more beyond that, including the backup goalie. the last 3 played 6-7 games, 2 were a walk on goalie and a starter out for the year injured after 6 games. If you want to see the field some, NW is the place.

There are no M&D or Hero’s players on Northwestern.

Yes, that's been stated now 9 times. I think we got it.

Not in this forum it hasn’t. 29s gotta know

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MDDC has a good 29 team but are they doing anything for their younger teams? They built the 29 team by recruiting talent from other clubs. They will have to do the same for their younger teams because they aren't very good.

Hate to break it to you but that’s how club lax works. Welcome to the party pal!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MDDC has a good 29 team but are they doing anything for their younger teams? They built the 29 team by recruiting talent from other clubs. They will have to do the same for their younger teams because they aren't very good.

Their ‘34 team is really good. M&D black ‘34…bit of a way to go to catch up. The M&D DC team is undefeated (5-0) and at the top of the standings (there is just one division; no A or B for ‘34s) along with really good Broadneck and HoCo ‘34 teams. M&D Black ‘34s are 1-4 and in the bottom third of the standings. Coppermine is at the very bottom but they are calling their team ‘34/‘35, so that could be the issue. Though Hero’s White ‘34 has a handful of ‘35s and they are in the middle of the pack. Skywalkers is right below them. Hero’s Green is a few teams ahead, with BLC, FLC and MD United West directly above them. Then you get to the top teams that I mentioned. I think there are 18 teams in all in that division. MDU North, whatever that is, is 2nd to last, just above Coppermine. Rebels and Ville are in the bottom too.

Does it matter who is good at the ‘34 age group? Not sure. What do you think? Not too familiar with Broadneck but the ‘34 HoCo team is really good but they may be the best HoCo team. Sort of like you all’s discussions of the DMV clubs, they would need to choose to stick with HoCo. They may but abandon HoCo at some point or be convinced to be part of building that club. Gotta stay to do that. Not thinking just having a few great young teams but crickets at all the older ages gets you too far? As far as club reputation goes.