SCOTUS outlaws race as college admissions factor

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Say goodbye to your gains among black voters, Republicans.

I don't believe that's the case. Progressives and racists believe the same thing-- that people are defined by their race and that people should be treated as members of groups rather than be evaluated for individual merit. They differ on what actions to take, but they both share the same foundational belief. I don't think most black people see the world this way, so I don't think this ruling will have an effect on black voting patterns. Also, they don't react well to Biden telling them that they aren't black, to him, unless they vote for him, etc, and surely he will say even more of this garbage during the campaign.

I wrote on this website about a decade ago that separating people into all these groups and favoring some groups over others is racism. In typical DCUM fashion, my post was deleted.

Also, Biden has some of the highest approval ratings coming from black voters. Why? The guy is clearly a racist as defined above and per prior statements, but they've largely bought into this rewritten definition (pandering?) coming from the left in which anything negative that happens to a person of color can ONLY be explained by "racism", end of story.

The guy who's "clearly a racist" has a VP who's female, black and indian, appointed the first black female justice to SCOTUS, is working on improving schooling and fixing infrastructure like replacing lead pipes in underserved historically black communities. You want to call it "pandering" as a deflection because the fact is, and history shows, you would have done NOTHING for those underserved communities.

DP. Have you heard of a man called LBJ?

Yep, LBJ was a product of the racist south and as such was known to use language now considered racist, and he initially opposed civil rights but ended up having a major turn of heart and was one of the main figures who pushed keystone civil rights legislation, one of the key figures who smashed Jim Crow laws, along with his Great Society policies to help the poor overall.

So, were you going somewhere with that non-point of yours? Or was it just another nothing burger like those dumb, history-ignorant "Byrd was KKK" and "Democrats were pro-Slavery" posts?

That's a lotta words to say he was a racist .

Exact opposite. You're truly a special kind of stupid.

Keep going with the pretzel logic. LBJ was a racist.

But his actions were anti-racist.

Welp, at least you're good at following instructions...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Say goodbye to your gains among black voters, Republicans.

I don't believe that's the case. Progressives and racists believe the same thing-- that people are defined by their race and that people should be treated as members of groups rather than be evaluated for individual merit. They differ on what actions to take, but they both share the same foundational belief. I don't think most black people see the world this way, so I don't think this ruling will have an effect on black voting patterns. Also, they don't react well to Biden telling them that they aren't black, to him, unless they vote for him, etc, and surely he will say even more of this garbage during the campaign.

I wrote on this website about a decade ago that separating people into all these groups and favoring some groups over others is racism. In typical DCUM fashion, my post was deleted.

Also, Biden has some of the highest approval ratings coming from black voters. Why? The guy is clearly a racist as defined above and per prior statements, but they've largely bought into this rewritten definition (pandering?) coming from the left in which anything negative that happens to a person of color can ONLY be explained by "racism", end of story.

The guy who's "clearly a racist" has a VP who's female, black and indian, appointed the first black female justice to SCOTUS, is working on improving schooling and fixing infrastructure like replacing lead pipes in underserved historically black communities. You want to call it "pandering" as a deflection because the fact is, and history shows, you would have done NOTHING for those underserved communities.

DP. Have you heard of a man called LBJ?

Actions speak louder than words.

+1000. LBJ's actions in support of civil rights and ending Jim Crow and toward promoting the Great Society speak volumes and volumes more than him using the now-antiquated southern language he grew up with. The PP trying to suggest otherwise is clearly a complete and utter moron for not seeing that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Say goodbye to your gains among black voters, Republicans.

I don't believe that's the case. Progressives and racists believe the same thing-- that people are defined by their race and that people should be treated as members of groups rather than be evaluated for individual merit. They differ on what actions to take, but they both share the same foundational belief. I don't think most black people see the world this way, so I don't think this ruling will have an effect on black voting patterns. Also, they don't react well to Biden telling them that they aren't black, to him, unless they vote for him, etc, and surely he will say even more of this garbage during the campaign.

I wrote on this website about a decade ago that separating people into all these groups and favoring some groups over others is racism. In typical DCUM fashion, my post was deleted.

Also, Biden has some of the highest approval ratings coming from black voters. Why? The guy is clearly a racist as defined above and per prior statements, but they've largely bought into this rewritten definition (pandering?) coming from the left in which anything negative that happens to a person of color can ONLY be explained by "racism", end of story.

The guy who's "clearly a racist" has a VP who's female, black and indian, appointed the first black female justice to SCOTUS, is working on improving schooling and fixing infrastructure like replacing lead pipes in underserved historically black communities. You want to call it "pandering" as a deflection because the fact is, and history shows, you would have done NOTHING for those underserved communities.

Ok this is clearly what I'm talking about. Again, repeat after me. Separating people into these different groups and favoring some groups over others is racism. Do you agree or disagree? Do you REALLY think Kamala Harris or Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson would have been picked if they were not black? Of course not! In fact, Biden was very open about the fact he wanted to select these positions based primarily on skin color and gender. Given these statements were first made while on the campaign trail, it absolutely qualifies as pandering.

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/08/28/politics/joe-biden-potential-vp-pick/index.html

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-potential-nominees-ketanji-brown-jackson-leondra-kruger-michelle-childs-candace-jackson-akiwumi/

I actually do care very much about minority communities. My concern is that this trendy, rewritten definition of racism infantilizes this particular group by encouraging perpetual victimhood and as a result, actually takes them back decades.

Well after centuries of having justices picked because they were white I have no problem with judges getting favored because they bring a different experience and pov to the court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Say goodbye to your gains among black voters, Republicans.

I don't believe that's the case. Progressives and racists believe the same thing-- that people are defined by their race and that people should be treated as members of groups rather than be evaluated for individual merit. They differ on what actions to take, but they both share the same foundational belief. I don't think most black people see the world this way, so I don't think this ruling will have an effect on black voting patterns. Also, they don't react well to Biden telling them that they aren't black, to him, unless they vote for him, etc, and surely he will say even more of this garbage during the campaign.

I wrote on this website about a decade ago that separating people into all these groups and favoring some groups over others is racism. In typical DCUM fashion, my post was deleted.

Also, Biden has some of the highest approval ratings coming from black voters. Why? The guy is clearly a racist as defined above and per prior statements, but they've largely bought into this rewritten definition (pandering?) coming from the left in which anything negative that happens to a person of color can ONLY be explained by "racism", end of story.

The guy who's "clearly a racist" has a VP who's female, black and indian, appointed the first black female justice to SCOTUS, is working on improving schooling and fixing infrastructure like replacing lead pipes in underserved historically black communities. You want to call it "pandering" as a deflection because the fact is, and history shows, you would have done NOTHING for those underserved communities.

DP. Have you heard of a man called LBJ?

Yep, LBJ was a product of the racist south and as such was known to use language now considered racist, and he initially opposed civil rights but ended up having a major turn of heart and was one of the main figures who pushed keystone civil rights legislation, one of the key figures who smashed Jim Crow laws, along with his Great Society policies to help the poor overall.

So, were you going somewhere with that non-point of yours? Or was it just another nothing burger like those dumb, history-ignorant "Byrd was KKK" and "Democrats were pro-Slavery" posts?

That's a lotta words to say he was a racist .

Exact opposite. You're truly a special kind of stupid.

Keep going with the pretzel logic. LBJ was a racist.

But his actions were anti-racist.

Welp, at least you're good at following instructions...

Do you disagree he enabled anti-racist legislation to become law?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Say goodbye to your gains among black voters, Republicans.

I don't believe that's the case. Progressives and racists believe the same thing-- that people are defined by their race and that people should be treated as members of groups rather than be evaluated for individual merit. They differ on what actions to take, but they both share the same foundational belief. I don't think most black people see the world this way, so I don't think this ruling will have an effect on black voting patterns. Also, they don't react well to Biden telling them that they aren't black, to him, unless they vote for him, etc, and surely he will say even more of this garbage during the campaign.

I wrote on this website about a decade ago that separating people into all these groups and favoring some groups over others is racism. In typical DCUM fashion, my post was deleted.

Also, Biden has some of the highest approval ratings coming from black voters. Why? The guy is clearly a racist as defined above and per prior statements, but they've largely bought into this rewritten definition (pandering?) coming from the left in which anything negative that happens to a person of color can ONLY be explained by "racism", end of story.

The guy who's "clearly a racist" has a VP who's female, black and indian, appointed the first black female justice to SCOTUS, is working on improving schooling and fixing infrastructure like replacing lead pipes in underserved historically black communities. You want to call it "pandering" as a deflection because the fact is, and history shows, you would have done NOTHING for those underserved communities.

Ok this is clearly what I'm talking about. Again, repeat after me. Separating people into these different groups and favoring some groups over others is racism. Do you agree or disagree? Do you REALLY think Kamala Harris or Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson would have been picked if they were not black? Of course not! In fact, Biden was very open about the fact he wanted to select these positions based primarily on skin color and gender. Given these statements were first made while on the campaign trail, it absolutely qualifies as pandering.

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/08/28/politics/joe-biden-potential-vp-pick/index.html

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-potential-nominees-ketanji-brown-jackson-leondra-kruger-michelle-childs-candace-jackson-akiwumi/

I actually do care very much about minority communities. My concern is that this trendy, rewritten definition of racism infantilizes this particular group by encouraging perpetual victimhood and as a result, actually takes them back decades.

Well after centuries of having justices picked because they were white I have no problem with judges getting favored because they bring a different experience and pov to the court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Say goodbye to your gains among black voters, Republicans.

I don't believe that's the case. Progressives and racists believe the same thing-- that people are defined by their race and that people should be treated as members of groups rather than be evaluated for individual merit. They differ on what actions to take, but they both share the same foundational belief. I don't think most black people see the world this way, so I don't think this ruling will have an effect on black voting patterns. Also, they don't react well to Biden telling them that they aren't black, to him, unless they vote for him, etc, and surely he will say even more of this garbage during the campaign.

I wrote on this website about a decade ago that separating people into all these groups and favoring some groups over others is racism. In typical DCUM fashion, my post was deleted.

Also, Biden has some of the highest approval ratings coming from black voters. Why? The guy is clearly a racist as defined above and per prior statements, but they've largely bought into this rewritten definition (pandering?) coming from the left in which anything negative that happens to a person of color can ONLY be explained by "racism", end of story.

The guy who's "clearly a racist" has a VP who's female, black and indian, appointed the first black female justice to SCOTUS, is working on improving schooling and fixing infrastructure like replacing lead pipes in underserved historically black communities. You want to call it "pandering" as a deflection because the fact is, and history shows, you would have done NOTHING for those underserved communities.

DP. Have you heard of a man called LBJ?

Actions speak louder than words.

+1000. LBJ's actions in support of civil rights and ending Jim Crow and toward promoting the Great Society speak volumes and volumes more than him using the now-antiquated southern language he grew up with. The PP trying to suggest otherwise is clearly a complete and utter moron for not seeing that.

Here you go again trying to sanitize this man's legacy just because he is on your team. The man was a massive, raging racist. You would not grant such grace to someone on the other "team" and are showing yourself to be an unprincipled, unserious hypocrite. It's funny how you can so easily brush aside the pernicious and wildly racist underpinnings of many of his utterances, let alone his actions. You are the type to cancel someone nowadays for something they did 30 years ago and provide no quarter for those words or actions being a "product of their time", yet sit here trying to grant LBJ the very same get out of jail free card that you so loathe when it is marshaled in defense of your political enemies. Girl bye!

Biden's history of questionably racist commentary is well documented.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Say goodbye to your gains among black voters, Republicans.

I don't believe that's the case. Progressives and racists believe the same thing-- that people are defined by their race and that people should be treated as members of groups rather than be evaluated for individual merit. They differ on what actions to take, but they both share the same foundational belief. I don't think most black people see the world this way, so I don't think this ruling will have an effect on black voting patterns. Also, they don't react well to Biden telling them that they aren't black, to him, unless they vote for him, etc, and surely he will say even more of this garbage during the campaign.

I wrote on this website about a decade ago that separating people into all these groups and favoring some groups over others is racism. In typical DCUM fashion, my post was deleted.

Also, Biden has some of the highest approval ratings coming from black voters. Why? The guy is clearly a racist as defined above and per prior statements, but they've largely bought into this rewritten definition (pandering?) coming from the left in which anything negative that happens to a person of color can ONLY be explained by "racism", end of story.

The guy who's "clearly a racist" has a VP who's female, black and indian, appointed the first black female justice to SCOTUS, is working on improving schooling and fixing infrastructure like replacing lead pipes in underserved historically black communities. You want to call it "pandering" as a deflection because the fact is, and history shows, you would have done NOTHING for those underserved communities.

DP. Have you heard of a man called LBJ?

Yep, LBJ was a product of the racist south and as such was known to use language now considered racist, and he initially opposed civil rights but ended up having a major turn of heart and was one of the main figures who pushed keystone civil rights legislation, one of the key figures who smashed Jim Crow laws, along with his Great Society policies to help the poor overall.

So, were you going somewhere with that non-point of yours? Or was it just another nothing burger like those dumb, history-ignorant "Byrd was KKK" and "Democrats were pro-Slavery" posts?

That's a lotta words to say he was a racist .

Exact opposite. You're truly a special kind of stupid.

Keep going with the pretzel logic. LBJ was a racist.

But his actions were anti-racist.

Welp, at least you're good at following instructions...

Do you disagree he enabled anti-racist legislation to become law?

You think he helped get those bills passed as part of some kind of moral enlightenment and out of the goodness of his heart? A lightbulb just went off all of a sudden after decades of well-documented racism?

Get real...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Say goodbye to your gains among black voters, Republicans.

I don't believe that's the case. Progressives and racists believe the same thing-- that people are defined by their race and that people should be treated as members of groups rather than be evaluated for individual merit. They differ on what actions to take, but they both share the same foundational belief. I don't think most black people see the world this way, so I don't think this ruling will have an effect on black voting patterns. Also, they don't react well to Biden telling them that they aren't black, to him, unless they vote for him, etc, and surely he will say even more of this garbage during the campaign.

I wrote on this website about a decade ago that separating people into all these groups and favoring some groups over others is racism. In typical DCUM fashion, my post was deleted.

Also, Biden has some of the highest approval ratings coming from black voters. Why? The guy is clearly a racist as defined above and per prior statements, but they've largely bought into this rewritten definition (pandering?) coming from the left in which anything negative that happens to a person of color can ONLY be explained by "racism", end of story.

The guy who's "clearly a racist" has a VP who's female, black and indian, appointed the first black female justice to SCOTUS, is working on improving schooling and fixing infrastructure like replacing lead pipes in underserved historically black communities. You want to call it "pandering" as a deflection because the fact is, and history shows, you would have done NOTHING for those underserved communities.

DP. Have you heard of a man called LBJ?

Actions speak louder than words.

+1000. LBJ's actions in support of civil rights and ending Jim Crow and toward promoting the Great Society speak volumes and volumes more than him using the now-antiquated southern language he grew up with. The PP trying to suggest otherwise is clearly a complete and utter moron for not seeing that.

Here you go again trying to sanitize this man's legacy just because he is on your team. The man was a massive, raging racist. You would not grant such grace to someone on the other "team" and are showing yourself to be an unprincipled, unserious hypocrite. It's funny how you can so easily brush aside the pernicious and wildly racist underpinnings of many of his utterances, let alone his actions. You are the type to cancel someone nowadays for something they did 30 years ago and provide no quarter for those words or actions being a "product of their time", yet sit here trying to grant LBJ the very same get out of jail free card that you so loathe when it is marshaled in defense of your political enemies. Girl bye!

Biden's history of questionably racist commentary is well documented.

Would a "massive, raging racist" want to end racist Jim Crow regulations, end racial segregation and discrimination, and promote civil rights and equality for other races?

And if you came up with any answer other than "no" then it shows how you are either seriously dishonest or deeply confused about the fundamental underpinnings and concepts of racism.

And furthermore, stop making up fake accusations of who I would "cancel." - As we see right here it is in fact YOU who is trying to cancel LBJ, for using the 'n' word. Do not project your own nonsense onto others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Say goodbye to your gains among black voters, Republicans.

I don't believe that's the case. Progressives and racists believe the same thing-- that people are defined by their race and that people should be treated as members of groups rather than be evaluated for individual merit. They differ on what actions to take, but they both share the same foundational belief. I don't think most black people see the world this way, so I don't think this ruling will have an effect on black voting patterns. Also, they don't react well to Biden telling them that they aren't black, to him, unless they vote for him, etc, and surely he will say even more of this garbage during the campaign.

I wrote on this website about a decade ago that separating people into all these groups and favoring some groups over others is racism. In typical DCUM fashion, my post was deleted.

Also, Biden has some of the highest approval ratings coming from black voters. Why? The guy is clearly a racist as defined above and per prior statements, but they've largely bought into this rewritten definition (pandering?) coming from the left in which anything negative that happens to a person of color can ONLY be explained by "racism", end of story.

The guy who's "clearly a racist" has a VP who's female, black and indian, appointed the first black female justice to SCOTUS, is working on improving schooling and fixing infrastructure like replacing lead pipes in underserved historically black communities. You want to call it "pandering" as a deflection because the fact is, and history shows, you would have done NOTHING for those underserved communities.

DP. Have you heard of a man called LBJ?

Yep, LBJ was a product of the racist south and as such was known to use language now considered racist, and he initially opposed civil rights but ended up having a major turn of heart and was one of the main figures who pushed keystone civil rights legislation, one of the key figures who smashed Jim Crow laws, along with his Great Society policies to help the poor overall.

So, were you going somewhere with that non-point of yours? Or was it just another nothing burger like those dumb, history-ignorant "Byrd was KKK" and "Democrats were pro-Slavery" posts?

That's a lotta words to say he was a racist .

Exact opposite. You're truly a special kind of stupid.

Keep going with the pretzel logic. LBJ was a racist.

But his actions were anti-racist.

Welp, at least you're good at following instructions...

Do you disagree he enabled anti-racist legislation to become law?

You think he helped get those bills passed as part of some kind of moral enlightenment and out of the goodness of his heart? A lightbulb just went off all of a sudden after decades of well-documented racism?

Get real...

No, YOU get real. It was YOUR side, the REPUBLICANS, and the racist southern Dixiecrats who switched sides to become Republicans, who voiced against and staunchly voted in opposition to LBJ civil rights legislation. That is an absolute fact.

You do not have a leg to stand on here. Your side proved themselves to be the real racists, while LBJ and the remaining Democrats were the ones fighting to end Jim Crow and segregation and other racist policies.

Trying to clam otherwise shows you to be at best completely unserious, at worst completely delusional or ignorant of history.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Say goodbye to your gains among black voters, Republicans.

I don't believe that's the case. Progressives and racists believe the same thing-- that people are defined by their race and that people should be treated as members of groups rather than be evaluated for individual merit. They differ on what actions to take, but they both share the same foundational belief. I don't think most black people see the world this way, so I don't think this ruling will have an effect on black voting patterns. Also, they don't react well to Biden telling them that they aren't black, to him, unless they vote for him, etc, and surely he will say even more of this garbage during the campaign.

I wrote on this website about a decade ago that separating people into all these groups and favoring some groups over others is racism. In typical DCUM fashion, my post was deleted.

Also, Biden has some of the highest approval ratings coming from black voters. Why? The guy is clearly a racist as defined above and per prior statements, but they've largely bought into this rewritten definition (pandering?) coming from the left in which anything negative that happens to a person of color can ONLY be explained by "racism", end of story.

The guy who's "clearly a racist" has a VP who's female, black and indian, appointed the first black female justice to SCOTUS, is working on improving schooling and fixing infrastructure like replacing lead pipes in underserved historically black communities. You want to call it "pandering" as a deflection because the fact is, and history shows, you would have done NOTHING for those underserved communities.

DP. Have you heard of a man called LBJ?

Actions speak louder than words.

+1000. LBJ's actions in support of civil rights and ending Jim Crow and toward promoting the Great Society speak volumes and volumes more than him using the now-antiquated southern language he grew up with. The PP trying to suggest otherwise is clearly a complete and utter moron for not seeing that.

Here you go again trying to sanitize this man's legacy just because he is on your team. The man was a massive, raging racist. You would not grant such grace to someone on the other "team" and are showing yourself to be an unprincipled, unserious hypocrite. It's funny how you can so easily brush aside the pernicious and wildly racist underpinnings of many of his utterances, let alone his actions. You are the type to cancel someone nowadays for something they did 30 years ago and provide no quarter for those words or actions being a "product of their time", yet sit here trying to grant LBJ the very same get out of jail free card that you so loathe when it is marshaled in defense of your political enemies. Girl bye!

Biden's history of questionably racist commentary is well documented.

Would a "massive, raging racist" want to end racist Jim Crow regulations, end racial segregation and discrimination, and promote civil rights and equality for other races?

And if you came up with any answer other than "no" then it shows how you are either seriously dishonest or deeply confused about the fundamental underpinnings and concepts of racism.

And furthermore, stop making up fake accusations of who I would "cancel." - As we see right here it is in fact YOU who is trying to cancel LBJ, for using the 'n' word. Do not project your own nonsense onto others.

Yes, they would.

The same type who is a nakedly ambitious, power hungry political animal. The type that Lincoln said would either free slaves or enslave free men, in pursuit of their ambition, depending on the status quo ex ante. The kind that told civil rights leaders to "make me do it" with regard to critical civil rights legislation.

Contrary to your balderdash, I am not trying to cancel LBJ at all, merely pointing out the complex man that he was and not shying away from the power of personal ambition and political calculus to achieve things in this sclerotic town. Your belief in the sincerity of politicians is kinda cute.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Say goodbye to your gains among black voters, Republicans.

I don't believe that's the case. Progressives and racists believe the same thing-- that people are defined by their race and that people should be treated as members of groups rather than be evaluated for individual merit. They differ on what actions to take, but they both share the same foundational belief. I don't think most black people see the world this way, so I don't think this ruling will have an effect on black voting patterns. Also, they don't react well to Biden telling them that they aren't black, to him, unless they vote for him, etc, and surely he will say even more of this garbage during the campaign.

I wrote on this website about a decade ago that separating people into all these groups and favoring some groups over others is racism. In typical DCUM fashion, my post was deleted.

Also, Biden has some of the highest approval ratings coming from black voters. Why? The guy is clearly a racist as defined above and per prior statements, but they've largely bought into this rewritten definition (pandering?) coming from the left in which anything negative that happens to a person of color can ONLY be explained by "racism", end of story.

The guy who's "clearly a racist" has a VP who's female, black and indian, appointed the first black female justice to SCOTUS, is working on improving schooling and fixing infrastructure like replacing lead pipes in underserved historically black communities. You want to call it "pandering" as a deflection because the fact is, and history shows, you would have done NOTHING for those underserved communities.

DP. Have you heard of a man called LBJ?

Yep, LBJ was a product of the racist south and as such was known to use language now considered racist, and he initially opposed civil rights but ended up having a major turn of heart and was one of the main figures who pushed keystone civil rights legislation, one of the key figures who smashed Jim Crow laws, along with his Great Society policies to help the poor overall.

So, were you going somewhere with that non-point of yours? Or was it just another nothing burger like those dumb, history-ignorant "Byrd was KKK" and "Democrats were pro-Slavery" posts?

That's a lotta words to say he was a racist .

Exact opposite. You're truly a special kind of stupid.

Keep going with the pretzel logic. LBJ was a racist.

But his actions were anti-racist.

Welp, at least you're good at following instructions...

Do you disagree he enabled anti-racist legislation to become law?

You think he helped get those bills passed as part of some kind of moral enlightenment and out of the goodness of his heart? A lightbulb just went off all of a sudden after decades of well-documented racism?

Get real...

Ohhh here we go with more of that deranged, cynical, sociopathic right wing mentality that nobody ever does anything to help anyone, and that it's all just "virtue signaling" (dumb right wing invented term) or "pandering." Thank you for yet again confirming your sociopathic tendencies. And as above, please stop projecting your own sociopathy onto others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Say goodbye to your gains among black voters, Republicans.

I don't believe that's the case. Progressives and racists believe the same thing-- that people are defined by their race and that people should be treated as members of groups rather than be evaluated for individual merit. They differ on what actions to take, but they both share the same foundational belief. I don't think most black people see the world this way, so I don't think this ruling will have an effect on black voting patterns. Also, they don't react well to Biden telling them that they aren't black, to him, unless they vote for him, etc, and surely he will say even more of this garbage during the campaign.

I wrote on this website about a decade ago that separating people into all these groups and favoring some groups over others is racism. In typical DCUM fashion, my post was deleted.

Also, Biden has some of the highest approval ratings coming from black voters. Why? The guy is clearly a racist as defined above and per prior statements, but they've largely bought into this rewritten definition (pandering?) coming from the left in which anything negative that happens to a person of color can ONLY be explained by "racism", end of story.

The guy who's "clearly a racist" has a VP who's female, black and indian, appointed the first black female justice to SCOTUS, is working on improving schooling and fixing infrastructure like replacing lead pipes in underserved historically black communities. You want to call it "pandering" as a deflection because the fact is, and history shows, you would have done NOTHING for those underserved communities.

DP. Have you heard of a man called LBJ?

Yep, LBJ was a product of the racist south and as such was known to use language now considered racist, and he initially opposed civil rights but ended up having a major turn of heart and was one of the main figures who pushed keystone civil rights legislation, one of the key figures who smashed Jim Crow laws, along with his Great Society policies to help the poor overall.

So, were you going somewhere with that non-point of yours? Or was it just another nothing burger like those dumb, history-ignorant "Byrd was KKK" and "Democrats were pro-Slavery" posts?

That's a lotta words to say he was a racist .

Exact opposite. You're truly a special kind of stupid.

Keep going with the pretzel logic. LBJ was a racist.

But his actions were anti-racist.

Welp, at least you're good at following instructions...

Do you disagree he enabled anti-racist legislation to become law?

You think he helped get those bills passed as part of some kind of moral enlightenment and out of the goodness of his heart? A lightbulb just went off all of a sudden after decades of well-documented racism?

Get real...

No, YOU get real. It was YOUR side, the REPUBLICANS, and the racist southern Dixiecrats who switched sides to become Republicans, who voiced against and staunchly voted in opposition to LBJ civil rights legislation. That is an absolute fact.

You do not have a leg to stand on here. Your side proved themselves to be the real racists, while LBJ and the remaining Democrats were the ones fighting to end Jim Crow and segregation and other racist policies.

Trying to clam otherwise shows you to be at best completely unserious, at worst completely delusional or ignorant of history.

Newsflash, genius. It is entirely possible for there to be racists in more than one party. Shocking, I know!

Take a minute a wrap your head around that concept for a minute.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Say goodbye to your gains among black voters, Republicans.

I don't believe that's the case. Progressives and racists believe the same thing-- that people are defined by their race and that people should be treated as members of groups rather than be evaluated for individual merit. They differ on what actions to take, but they both share the same foundational belief. I don't think most black people see the world this way, so I don't think this ruling will have an effect on black voting patterns. Also, they don't react well to Biden telling them that they aren't black, to him, unless they vote for him, etc, and surely he will say even more of this garbage during the campaign.

I wrote on this website about a decade ago that separating people into all these groups and favoring some groups over others is racism. In typical DCUM fashion, my post was deleted.

Also, Biden has some of the highest approval ratings coming from black voters. Why? The guy is clearly a racist as defined above and per prior statements, but they've largely bought into this rewritten definition (pandering?) coming from the left in which anything negative that happens to a person of color can ONLY be explained by "racism", end of story.

The guy who's "clearly a racist" has a VP who's female, black and indian, appointed the first black female justice to SCOTUS, is working on improving schooling and fixing infrastructure like replacing lead pipes in underserved historically black communities. You want to call it "pandering" as a deflection because the fact is, and history shows, you would have done NOTHING for those underserved communities.

DP. Have you heard of a man called LBJ?

Actions speak louder than words.

+1000. LBJ's actions in support of civil rights and ending Jim Crow and toward promoting the Great Society speak volumes and volumes more than him using the now-antiquated southern language he grew up with. The PP trying to suggest otherwise is clearly a complete and utter moron for not seeing that.

Here you go again trying to sanitize this man's legacy just because he is on your team. The man was a massive, raging racist. You would not grant such grace to someone on the other "team" and are showing yourself to be an unprincipled, unserious hypocrite. It's funny how you can so easily brush aside the pernicious and wildly racist underpinnings of many of his utterances, let alone his actions. You are the type to cancel someone nowadays for something they did 30 years ago and provide no quarter for those words or actions being a "product of their time", yet sit here trying to grant LBJ the very same get out of jail free card that you so loathe when it is marshaled in defense of your political enemies. Girl bye!

Biden's history of questionably racist commentary is well documented.

Would a "massive, raging racist" want to end racist Jim Crow regulations, end racial segregation and discrimination, and promote civil rights and equality for other races?

And if you came up with any answer other than "no" then it shows how you are either seriously dishonest or deeply confused about the fundamental underpinnings and concepts of racism.

And furthermore, stop making up fake accusations of who I would "cancel." - As we see right here it is in fact YOU who is trying to cancel LBJ, for using the 'n' word. Do not project your own nonsense onto others.

Yes, they would.

The same type who is a nakedly ambitious, power hungry political animal. The type that Lincoln said would either free slaves or enslave free men, in pursuit of their ambition, depending on the status quo ex ante. The kind that told civil rights leaders to "make me do it" with regard to critical civil rights legislation.

Contrary to your balderdash, I am not trying to cancel LBJ at all, merely pointing out the complex man that he was and not shying away from the power of personal ambition and political calculus to achieve things in this sclerotic town. Your belief in the sincerity of politicians is kinda cute.

What is NOT balderdash: It was YOUR side, the REPUBLICANS, and the racist southern pro-segregation Dixiecrats who switched sides to become Republicans, who voiced against and staunchly voted in opposition to LBJ civil rights legislation. That is an absolute fact.

You do not have a leg to stand on here. Your side proved themselves to be the real racists, while LBJ and the remaining Democrats were the ones fighting to end Jim Crow and segregation and other racist policies.

Trying to clam otherwise shows you to be at best completely unserious, at worst completely delusional or ignorant of history.

Even if LBJ was trying to win votes, the fact is he did a lot of good for America. Your side instead clung to pure evil and actively fought to protect racist policies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Say goodbye to your gains among black voters, Republicans.

I don't believe that's the case. Progressives and racists believe the same thing-- that people are defined by their race and that people should be treated as members of groups rather than be evaluated for individual merit. They differ on what actions to take, but they both share the same foundational belief. I don't think most black people see the world this way, so I don't think this ruling will have an effect on black voting patterns. Also, they don't react well to Biden telling them that they aren't black, to him, unless they vote for him, etc, and surely he will say even more of this garbage during the campaign.

I wrote on this website about a decade ago that separating people into all these groups and favoring some groups over others is racism. In typical DCUM fashion, my post was deleted.

Also, Biden has some of the highest approval ratings coming from black voters. Why? The guy is clearly a racist as defined above and per prior statements, but they've largely bought into this rewritten definition (pandering?) coming from the left in which anything negative that happens to a person of color can ONLY be explained by "racism", end of story.

The guy who's "clearly a racist" has a VP who's female, black and indian, appointed the first black female justice to SCOTUS, is working on improving schooling and fixing infrastructure like replacing lead pipes in underserved historically black communities. You want to call it "pandering" as a deflection because the fact is, and history shows, you would have done NOTHING for those underserved communities.

DP. Have you heard of a man called LBJ?

Yep, LBJ was a product of the racist south and as such was known to use language now considered racist, and he initially opposed civil rights but ended up having a major turn of heart and was one of the main figures who pushed keystone civil rights legislation, one of the key figures who smashed Jim Crow laws, along with his Great Society policies to help the poor overall.

So, were you going somewhere with that non-point of yours? Or was it just another nothing burger like those dumb, history-ignorant "Byrd was KKK" and "Democrats were pro-Slavery" posts?

That's a lotta words to say he was a racist .

Exact opposite. You're truly a special kind of stupid.

Keep going with the pretzel logic. LBJ was a racist.

But his actions were anti-racist.

Welp, at least you're good at following instructions...

Do you disagree he enabled anti-racist legislation to become law?

You think he helped get those bills passed as part of some kind of moral enlightenment and out of the goodness of his heart? A lightbulb just went off all of a sudden after decades of well-documented racism?

Get real...

No, YOU get real. It was YOUR side, the REPUBLICANS, and the racist southern Dixiecrats who switched sides to become Republicans, who voiced against and staunchly voted in opposition to LBJ civil rights legislation. That is an absolute fact.

You do not have a leg to stand on here. Your side proved themselves to be the real racists, while LBJ and the remaining Democrats were the ones fighting to end Jim Crow and segregation and other racist policies.

Trying to clam otherwise shows you to be at best completely unserious, at worst completely delusional or ignorant of history.

Newsflash, genius. It is entirely possible for there to be racists in more than one party. Shocking, I know!

Take a minute a wrap your head around that concept for a minute.

Wow, mastery of the obvious. You continue to make yourself look stupid. Now let's get back to which side's actions were more consequential toward ending Jim Crow, segregation, redlining and other deeply racist policies. Hint: It was NOT the Republicans.

Your attempts to #bothsides this is absolutely pathetic, dishonest, and frankly disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Say goodbye to your gains among black voters, Republicans.

I don't believe that's the case. Progressives and racists believe the same thing-- that people are defined by their race and that people should be treated as members of groups rather than be evaluated for individual merit. They differ on what actions to take, but they both share the same foundational belief. I don't think most black people see the world this way, so I don't think this ruling will have an effect on black voting patterns. Also, they don't react well to Biden telling them that they aren't black, to him, unless they vote for him, etc, and surely he will say even more of this garbage during the campaign.

I wrote on this website about a decade ago that separating people into all these groups and favoring some groups over others is racism. In typical DCUM fashion, my post was deleted.

Also, Biden has some of the highest approval ratings coming from black voters. Why? The guy is clearly a racist as defined above and per prior statements, but they've largely bought into this rewritten definition (pandering?) coming from the left in which anything negative that happens to a person of color can ONLY be explained by "racism", end of story.

The guy who's "clearly a racist" has a VP who's female, black and indian, appointed the first black female justice to SCOTUS, is working on improving schooling and fixing infrastructure like replacing lead pipes in underserved historically black communities. You want to call it "pandering" as a deflection because the fact is, and history shows, you would have done NOTHING for those underserved communities.

DP. Have you heard of a man called LBJ?

Yep, LBJ was a product of the racist south and as such was known to use language now considered racist, and he initially opposed civil rights but ended up having a major turn of heart and was one of the main figures who pushed keystone civil rights legislation, one of the key figures who smashed Jim Crow laws, along with his Great Society policies to help the poor overall.

So, were you going somewhere with that non-point of yours? Or was it just another nothing burger like those dumb, history-ignorant "Byrd was KKK" and "Democrats were pro-Slavery" posts?

That's a lotta words to say he was a racist .

Exact opposite. You're truly a special kind of stupid.

Keep going with the pretzel logic. LBJ was a racist.

But his actions were anti-racist.

Welp, at least you're good at following instructions...

Do you disagree he enabled anti-racist legislation to become law?

You think he helped get those bills passed as part of some kind of moral enlightenment and out of the goodness of his heart? A lightbulb just went off all of a sudden after decades of well-documented racism?

Get real...

No, YOU get real. It was YOUR side, the REPUBLICANS, and the racist southern Dixiecrats who switched sides to become Republicans, who voiced against and staunchly voted in opposition to LBJ civil rights legislation. That is an absolute fact.

You do not have a leg to stand on here. Your side proved themselves to be the real racists, while LBJ and the remaining Democrats were the ones fighting to end Jim Crow and segregation and other racist policies.

Trying to clam otherwise shows you to be at best completely unserious, at worst completely delusional or ignorant of history.

Newsflash, genius. It is entirely possible for there to be racists in more than one party. Shocking, I know!

Take a minute a wrap your head around that concept for a minute.

Wow, mastery of the obvious. You continue to make yourself look stupid. Now let's get back to which side's actions were more consequential toward ending Jim Crow, segregation, redlining and other deeply racist policies. Hint: It was NOT the Republicans.

Your attempts to #bothsides this is absolutely pathetic, dishonest, and frankly disgusting.

You are so lost in the "my party is better than yours" sauce that you have forgotten the original premise upon which this discussion even began, which was the silly notion that just because Joe Biden picked a few minorities, he couldn't be racist. It's a false, silly premise. You were wrong.

I have no desire to engage in your "my party is better than yours" moral member measuring contest. Do better.