LCPS sexual assualt - who is held accountable?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This story is chilling. I don't know how a parent can mentally handle knowing their child was violated in such a way.

The treatment towards him was reprehensible

Eh, his chilling willingly did the dead numerous previous times. She still has the right to withdraw consent but she wasn’t a virgin, and had previously had consensual sex with this boy in this bathroom.

The boy claims he “accidentally” anally penetrated her and the rape kit showed force. This is not as much of a “he said-she said” as you’d like to believe.

She’s allowed to withdraw consent, AS I SAID. Doesn’t change the fact that she’s admitted to banging boys in the Hs bathroom.

WOW. So that somehow makes her sexual assault less horrifying? What is wrong with you? Who cares if she banged the entire football team and cheerleading squad on live broadcast before. It doesn’t matter what happened before, the fact she was forcefully penetrated is just as awful as if she were a virgin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This story is chilling. I don't know how a parent can mentally handle knowing their child was violated in such a way.

The treatment towards him was reprehensible

Eh, his chilling willingly did the dead numerous previous times. She still has the right to withdraw consent but she wasn’t a virgin, and had previously had consensual sex with this boy in this bathroom.

The boy claims he “accidentally” anally penetrated her and the rape kit showed force. This is not as much of a “he said-she said” as you’d like to believe.

She’s allowed to withdraw consent, AS I SAID. Doesn’t change the fact that she’s admitted to banging boys in the Hs bathroom.

WOW. So that somehow makes her sexual assault less horrifying? What is wrong with you? Who cares if she banged the entire football team and cheerleading squad on live broadcast before. It doesn’t matter what happened before, the fact she was forcefully penetrated is just as awful as if she were a virgin.

As true as it is, her past sexual relationship with the perp is relevant primarily because it flies in the face of the narrative about the skirt-wearing trans boogeyman lurking in the loo. Because that’s what the histrionic ninnies hollering at the school board were insisting what was happening. The truth, as we learned, was very different.

If we want to have a conversation about sexual assault in schools, let’s have it. But let’s stop attacking the trans community first.

[Anonymous]

As true as it is, her past sexual relationship with the perp is relevant primarily because it flies in the face of the narrative about the skirt-wearing trans boogeyman lurking in the loo. Because that’s what the histrionic ninnies hollering at the school board were insisting what was happening. The truth, as we learned, was very different.

If we want to have a conversation about sexual assault in schools, let’s have it. But let’s stop attacking the trans community first.

Then, let's be sure that the boys using the girls' bathrooms are trans--and not just fluid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This story is chilling. I don't know how a parent can mentally handle knowing their child was violated in such a way.

The treatment towards him was reprehensible

Eh, his chilling willingly did the dead numerous previous times. She still has the right to withdraw consent but she wasn’t a virgin, and had previously had consensual sex with this boy in this bathroom.

The boy claims he “accidentally” anally penetrated her and the rape kit showed force. This is not as much of a “he said-she said” as you’d like to believe.

She’s allowed to withdraw consent, AS I SAID. Doesn’t change the fact that she’s admitted to banging boys in the Hs bathroom.

WOW. So that somehow makes her sexual assault less horrifying? What is wrong with you? Who cares if she banged the entire football team and cheerleading squad on live broadcast before. It doesn’t matter what happened before, the fact she was forcefully penetrated is just as awful as if she were a virgin.

As true as it is, her past sexual relationship with the perp is relevant primarily because it flies in the face of the narrative about the skirt-wearing trans boogeyman lurking in the loo. Because that’s what the histrionic ninnies hollering at the school board were insisting what was happening. The truth, as we learned, was very different.

If we want to have a conversation about sexual assault in schools, let’s have it. But let’s stop attacking the trans community first.

NP. Let's stick to the facts please.

Student born as a male, wearing a skirt, was found guilty of raping a girl in the school bathroom.

You are victim blaming a teen rape victim. The boogeymen here are:

1) rapist, and 2) you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This story is chilling. I don't know how a parent can mentally handle knowing their child was violated in such a way.

The treatment towards him was reprehensible

Eh, his chilling willingly did the dead numerous previous times. She still has the right to withdraw consent but she wasn’t a virgin, and had previously had consensual sex with this boy in this bathroom.

The boy claims he “accidentally” anally penetrated her and the rape kit showed force. This is not as much of a “he said-she said” as you’d like to believe.

She’s allowed to withdraw consent, AS I SAID. Doesn’t change the fact that she’s admitted to banging boys in the Hs bathroom.

WOW. So that somehow makes her sexual assault less horrifying? What is wrong with you? Who cares if she banged the entire football team and cheerleading squad on live broadcast before. It doesn’t matter what happened before, the fact she was forcefully penetrated is just as awful as if she were a virgin.

As true as it is, her past sexual relationship with the perp is relevant primarily because it flies in the face of the narrative about the skirt-wearing trans boogeyman lurking in the loo. Because that’s what the histrionic ninnies hollering at the school board were insisting what was happening. The truth, as we learned, was very different.

If we want to have a conversation about sexual assault in schools, let’s have it. But let’s stop attacking the trans community first.

No one is attacking the trans community except you in your own head. LCPS parents are upset that this was covered up because the admin thought it would make their trans bathroom policy look bad. You can agree or disagree with the trans bathroom policy and still think rapes should not be covered up. Well, most people can anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This story is chilling. I don't know how a parent can mentally handle knowing their child was violated in such a way.

The treatment towards him was reprehensible

Eh, his chilling willingly did the dead numerous previous times. She still has the right to withdraw consent but she wasn’t a virgin, and had previously had consensual sex with this boy in this bathroom.

The boy claims he “accidentally” anally penetrated her and the rape kit showed force. This is not as much of a “he said-she said” as you’d like to believe.

She’s allowed to withdraw consent, AS I SAID. Doesn’t change the fact that she’s admitted to banging boys in the Hs bathroom.

WOW. So that somehow makes her sexual assault less horrifying? What is wrong with you? Who cares if she banged the entire football team and cheerleading squad on live broadcast before. It doesn’t matter what happened before, the fact she was forcefully penetrated is just as awful as if she were a virgin.

+1 million

That PP is blaming the victim and that is gross and inappropriate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This story is chilling. I don't know how a parent can mentally handle knowing their child was violated in such a way.

The treatment towards him was reprehensible

Eh, his chilling willingly did the dead numerous previous times. She still has the right to withdraw consent but she wasn’t a virgin, and had previously had consensual sex with this boy in this bathroom.

The boy claims he “accidentally” anally penetrated her and the rape kit showed force. This is not as much of a “he said-she said” as you’d like to believe.

She’s allowed to withdraw consent, AS I SAID. Doesn’t change the fact that she’s admitted to banging boys in the Hs bathroom.

WOW. So that somehow makes her sexual assault less horrifying? What is wrong with you? Who cares if she banged the entire football team and cheerleading squad on live broadcast before. It doesn’t matter what happened before, the fact she was forcefully penetrated is just as awful as if she were a virgin.

As true as it is, her past sexual relationship with the perp is relevant primarily because it flies in the face of the narrative about the skirt-wearing trans boogeyman lurking in the loo. Because that’s what the histrionic ninnies hollering at the school board were insisting what was happening. The truth, as we learned, was very different.

If we want to have a conversation about sexual assault in schools, let’s have it. But let’s stop attacking the trans community first.

No one is attacking the trans community except you in your own head. LCPS parents are upset that this was covered up because the admin thought it would make their trans bathroom policy look bad. You can agree or disagree with the trans bathroom policy and still think rapes should not be covered up. Well, most people can anyway.

No, the entire mode of attack against the school board trans-friendly policy is that it would lead to perverts lurking in bathrooms and locker rooms. That was the entire narrative. Maybe you missed it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

As true as it is, her past sexual relationship with the perp is relevant primarily because it flies in the face of the narrative about the skirt-wearing trans boogeyman lurking in the loo. Because that’s what the histrionic ninnies hollering at the school board were insisting what was happening. The truth, as we learned, was very different.

If we want to have a conversation about sexual assault in schools, let’s have it. But let’s stop attacking the trans community first.

Then, let's be sure that the boys using the girls' bathrooms are trans--and not just fluid.

How can anyone possibly know if someone is trans vs fluid

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This story is chilling. I don't know how a parent can mentally handle knowing their child was violated in such a way.

The treatment towards him was reprehensible

Eh, his chilling willingly did the dead numerous previous times. She still has the right to withdraw consent but she wasn’t a virgin, and had previously had consensual sex with this boy in this bathroom.

The boy claims he “accidentally” anally penetrated her and the rape kit showed force. This is not as much of a “he said-she said” as you’d like to believe.

She’s allowed to withdraw consent, AS I SAID. Doesn’t change the fact that she’s admitted to banging boys in the Hs bathroom.

WOW. So that somehow makes her sexual assault less horrifying? What is wrong with you? Who cares if she banged the entire football team and cheerleading squad on live broadcast before. It doesn’t matter what happened before, the fact she was forcefully penetrated is just as awful as if she were a virgin.

As true as it is, her past sexual relationship with the perp is relevant primarily because it flies in the face of the narrative about the skirt-wearing trans boogeyman lurking in the loo. Because that’s what the histrionic ninnies hollering at the school board were insisting what was happening. The truth, as we learned, was very different.

If we want to have a conversation about sexual assault in schools, let’s have it. But let’s stop attacking the trans community first.

NP. Let's stick to the facts please.

Student born as a male, wearing a skirt, was found guilty of raping a girl in the school bathroom.

You are victim blaming a teen rape victim. The boogeymen here are:

1) rapist, and 2) you.

No, you disgusting piece of shit.

The narrative is of the disingenuous skirt-wearing “trans” kid doing it to gain access to the girls bathroom.

That isn’t what happened.

Your continued insistence that this is what happened — that is was some random attack — is beyond vile. You are absolutely disgusting.

Stop using victims of sexual assault in your vile, vile cause targeting trans people. This has nothing to do whatsoever with the trans community.

DP

It is typical of people to personally insult posters when they have nothing accurate to say to refute the post.

What exact fact in the PP’s post do you say ‘isn’t what happened’? The PP is posting facts. Facts are important, whether you like it or not. There is no ‘narrative’ when you stick to the facts, which is what we all should be doing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

As true as it is, her past sexual relationship with the perp is relevant primarily because it flies in the face of the narrative about the skirt-wearing trans boogeyman lurking in the loo. Because that’s what the histrionic ninnies hollering at the school board were insisting what was happening. The truth, as we learned, was very different.

If we want to have a conversation about sexual assault in schools, let’s have it. But let’s stop attacking the trans community first.

Then, let's be sure that the boys using the girls' bathrooms are trans--and not just fluid.

How can anyone possibly know if someone is trans vs fluid

Isn’t the the point though? Anyone can come and go into the girls’ bathroom. Which is inappropriate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This story is chilling. I don't know how a parent can mentally handle knowing their child was violated in such a way.

The treatment towards him was reprehensible

Eh, his chilling willingly did the dead numerous previous times. She still has the right to withdraw consent but she wasn’t a virgin, and had previously had consensual sex with this boy in this bathroom.

The boy claims he “accidentally” anally penetrated her and the rape kit showed force. This is not as much of a “he said-she said” as you’d like to believe.

She’s allowed to withdraw consent, AS I SAID. Doesn’t change the fact that she’s admitted to banging boys in the Hs bathroom.

WOW. So that somehow makes her sexual assault less horrifying? What is wrong with you? Who cares if she banged the entire football team and cheerleading squad on live broadcast before. It doesn’t matter what happened before, the fact she was forcefully penetrated is just as awful as if she were a virgin.

As true as it is, her past sexual relationship with the perp is relevant primarily because it flies in the face of the narrative about the skirt-wearing trans boogeyman lurking in the loo. Because that’s what the histrionic ninnies hollering at the school board were insisting what was happening. The truth, as we learned, was very different.

If we want to have a conversation about sexual assault in schools, let’s have it. But let’s stop attacking the trans community first.

NP. Let's stick to the facts please.

Student born as a male, wearing a skirt, was found guilty of raping a girl in the school bathroom.

You are victim blaming a teen rape victim. The boogeymen here are:

1) rapist, and 2) you.

No, you disgusting piece of shit.

The narrative is of the disingenuous skirt-wearing “trans” kid doing it to gain access to the girls bathroom.

That isn’t what happened.

Your continued insistence that this is what happened — that is was some random attack — is beyond vile. You are absolutely disgusting.

Stop using victims of sexual assault in your vile, vile cause targeting trans people. This has nothing to do whatsoever with the trans community.

DP

It is typical of people to personally insult posters when they have nothing accurate to say to refute the post.

What exact fact in the PP’s post do you say ‘isn’t what happened’? The PP is posting facts. Facts are important, whether you like it or not. There is no ‘narrative’ when you stick to the facts, which is what we all should be doing.

You’re right. The pp called me a boogeyman. She has nothing and is likely a bigot.

[Anonymous]

The mother of the student adjudicated guilty as a rapist claims that he is not trans. If one of the principles of the trans movement is to permit people to choose their identity, and I believe it is, there is evidence that this student does not identify as trans but certainly is open to assuming a feminine appearance. I am not sure the narrative is relevant. Sexual assault is wrong, grievously wrong, and deserves redress. If, and I am not suggesting this is the case here, the bathroom policy contributed to a negative event, that has to be examined irrespective of the narrative. Schools cannot function without an expectation of safety.

The problem I have with the handling of this case is that the school authorities acted (from all accounts) that trans people are higher in the woke ladder than young women. This is the problem with identity politics - it eats itself and can lead to poor decisions. Young women should be able to rely on being safe in washrooms, particularly in wealthy Loudoun County where resources can make this so. By the way, the same goes for trans students, gay students, shy students or any other type of student. No one gets a pass for sexual assault or should be subject to it. And lets be real - if the student is somehow trans, well, every group has its bad apples. Not dealing transparently with the issue does no one any favors.

I am appalled at the mention of the girls' sexual history. Do people who believe this is relevant have any idea of the need for rape shield laws, which gained steam in the 60's and 70's? Heck, in the 80's when I was a law review editor at a top law school we were still getting articles about the challenges in implementing rape shield laws and eliminating sexist artifacts. I am no bleeding heart, either, but rape shield laws are all about justice. Such laws back then were resisted by archaic white men who believed that assault was excusable if women acted a certain way. So the people arguing that this young woman's sexual history is relevant are in essence asserting the rationale of narrow minded troglodytes of the past? Such people aren't liberal or progressive, but are in fact intolerant. A major media publication took this position in this case - to heck with the prote4ction of women and rape shield considerations- because again, protecting the narrative of trans people was perceived as more important than protecting women against violence.

Nothing herein should be taken as being intolerant of trans people. But rape is wrong, and group identity does not excuse it any way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This story is chilling. I don't know how a parent can mentally handle knowing their child was violated in such a way.

The treatment towards him was reprehensible

Eh, his chilling willingly did the dead numerous previous times. She still has the right to withdraw consent but she wasn’t a virgin, and had previously had consensual sex with this boy in this bathroom.

The boy claims he “accidentally” anally penetrated her and the rape kit showed force. This is not as much of a “he said-she said” as you’d like to believe.

She’s allowed to withdraw consent, AS I SAID. Doesn’t change the fact that she’s admitted to banging boys in the Hs bathroom.

WOW. So that somehow makes her sexual assault less horrifying? What is wrong with you? Who cares if she banged the entire football team and cheerleading squad on live broadcast before. It doesn’t matter what happened before, the fact she was forcefully penetrated is just as awful as if she were a virgin.

- horrible, disgusting, victim-blaming.

Why does this person keep minimizing the forcible rape of a minor in our public schools?

Is it just to defend an activist school board which lied and attempted to cover up this forcible rape?

[Anonymous]

Surprised no one has posted about this. The boy was sentenced.

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/northern-virginia/this-one-scares-me-teen-convicted-in-loudoun-school-sex-attacks-to-register-as-sex-offender/2935054/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The mother of the student adjudicated guilty as a rapist claims that he is not trans. If one of the principles of the trans movement is to permit people to choose their identity, and I believe it is, there is evidence that this student does not identify as trans but certainly is open to assuming a feminine appearance. I am not sure the narrative is relevant. Sexual assault is wrong, grievously wrong, and deserves redress. If, and I am not suggesting this is the case here, the bathroom policy contributed to a negative event, that has to be examined irrespective of the narrative. Schools cannot function without an expectation of safety.

The problem I have with the handling of this case is that the school authorities acted (from all accounts) that trans people are higher in the woke ladder than young women. This is the problem with identity politics - it eats itself and can lead to poor decisions. Young women should be able to rely on being safe in washrooms, particularly in wealthy Loudoun County where resources can make this so. By the way, the same goes for trans students, gay students, shy students or any other type of student. No one gets a pass for sexual assault or should be subject to it. And lets be real - if the student is somehow trans, well, every group has its bad apples. Not dealing transparently with the issue does no one any favors.

I am appalled at the mention of the girls' sexual history. Do people who believe this is relevant have any idea of the need for rape shield laws, which gained steam in the 60's and 70's? Heck, in the 80's when I was a law review editor at a top law school we were still getting articles about the challenges in implementing rape shield laws and eliminating sexist artifacts. I am no bleeding heart, either, but rape shield laws are all about justice. Such laws back then were resisted by archaic white men who believed that assault was excusable if women acted a certain way. So the people arguing that this young woman's sexual history is relevant are in essence asserting the rationale of narrow minded troglodytes of the past? Such people aren't liberal or progressive, but are in fact intolerant. A major media publication took this position in this case - to heck with the prote4ction of women and rape shield considerations- because again, protecting the narrative of trans people was perceived as more important than protecting women against violence.

Nothing herein should be taken as being intolerant of trans people. But rape is wrong, and group identity does not excuse it any way.

Well said (written).

Thank you.