Didn’t expect a different outcome. His parents signed a release seems like his issue should be with his parents not Nirvana. |
|
I don’t understand how Nirvana used the baby’s photo w/out getting signed permission from his parents??!
Most especially when that album cover was (and still is!) so darn iconic. How does this happen? Anyway the guy should get a cut of the money - though not for the reasoning he demanded. He should get something monetary for the fact that his picture was used to market an album. However even if he never gets a red cent, how many freakin’ people get to brag that they were THAT baby on the cover of THAT album cover???!! 👍🏽 He will probably be more famous than the Gerber baby! |
I don't understand it is the human body and the taboo around that is ridiculous Babies love to swim. I don't think they even need bathing suits Who cares about his penis, the picture is great. Perhaps you are somewhat perverted to even fixate on that |
The guy is more known for his lawsuit than as "that" baby on the Nirvana album. Maybe that's what he wanted all along - attention - even if it's negative. Abd the Nirvana album gets press. Win for them for sure. |
+1 So lame. |
Update: He’s given another change to amend his complaint: https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/judge-gives-nirvana-baby-last-chance-to-revive-lawsuit |
|
Final update:
Statute of Limitations had expired https://apple.news/AAn-mkaEJR5-mwEPlhxD6pg |
I guess, but this seems to be his whole identity, between the 6-7 times he's recreated it, and the tattoo. |