Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
How am I crazy? I’m repeating what her ex is saying. Obviously he could be lying. |
|
They can’t defend the lie.
Because they can’t. Everyone is fully aware that what she said and what they have been saying is untrue. So instead they’ll just attack anyone who points out the lying and scoff that what they’re lying about doesn’t matter or no one cares. As if it’s the topic itself (and not the repeated LIE about the topic) that is the issue. I don’t care if you wore a purple short yesterday or a blue shirt. But if you insist today that the purple shirt you wore yesterday was BLUE, that is a LIE. Truth matters. And I couldn’t give a f%*# about which color you wore yesterday, today, or tomorrow. I care that you keep LYING about it. |
Why are you repeating a disgruntled ex. Find the evidence, provide it, be a hero to the GOP. Obviously he is lying. |
Look her ex is saying that he and Jill met Joe years before Joe and Jill claim they met. He is saying that they campaigned for Joe, were guests in his house, when he was still married to Joe, and that he was suspicious that Jill was having an affair with Joe. Sure the ex could be lying, but that would be quite the lie to tell. It’s certainly not hard to imagine why Jill and Joe wouldn’t admit that they started their relationship shortly before the death of his wife. |
Why obviously? |
|
Um, too bad Joe crashed Jill car, and got caught. The facts don’t lie. |
Really, did *she* tell you that? |
You’re allowed to retrieve the police report. DP |
Not only that, but they could easily have sued him for libel and defamation. That’s a huge whopper of it’s untrue. But instead it was swept under the rug as quickly as possible. There was an election to win! I get that. I’m with the others though who don’t understand the benefit of Jill wading back into it by openly lying about it again when she didn’t even need to bring g it up. Seems careless. |