Va Dems trying to ban smoking in apartments

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m all for this.

naturally a bigot would

Dude you can get your rocks off getting the last word in all you want. Doesn't change the fact that from now on if you want to slowly poison yourself you will no longer be taking your neighbors with you.

[Anonymous]

Should people be evicted over incense ? Smoke is smoke

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m all for this.

naturally a bigot would

Dude you can get your rocks off getting the last word in all you want. Doesn't change the fact that from now on if you want to slowly poison yourself you will no longer be taking your neighbors with you.

PP is a big crybaby. Just ignore.

[Anonymous]

good. smoking is gross

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:good. smoking is gross

ao are some sex acts. So is obesity . Should they become homeless over that ?

[Anonymous]

If this law is enacted, will it unfairly target minorities? I see no reason why it won’t. And what about smoke from something besides cigarettes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If this law is enacted, will it unfairly target minorities? I see no reason why it won’t. And what about smoke from something besides cigarettes?

I’m not sure how a law that makes no mention of race could be seen as targeting a race.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:good. smoking is gross

ao are some sex acts. So is obesity . Should they become homeless over that ?

So we can evict the gays now? Based on precedent, I'd say looks likely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If this law is enacted, will it unfairly target minorities? I see no reason why it won’t. And what about smoke from something besides cigarettes?

But but but but but muh pot!!! Pot smoke cures cancer! It makes you smarter!

My weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If this law is enacted, will it unfairly target minorities? I see no reason why it won’t. And what about smoke from something besides cigarettes?

I’m not sure how a law that makes no mention of race could be seen as targeting a race.

That and considering whites smoke more than AA do...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How?

When's the last time a republican told anyone they couldn't smoke?

Never.


That's how.

Republicans probably encourage smoking. More profits for big tobacco!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How?

When's the last time a republican told anyone they couldn't smoke?

Never.


That's how.

Republicans probably encourage smoking. More profits for big tobacco!

Anything to make a buck.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If this law is enacted, will it unfairly target minorities? I see no reason why it won’t. And what about smoke from something besides cigarettes?

it should apply to any kind of smoke but I do see states like California exempting pot from smoking bans. Total hypocrisy

[Anonymous]

Smoking by race. Native Americans highest, then blacks , then whites https://www.lung.org/stop-smoking/smoking-facts/tobacco-use-racial-and-ethnic.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If this law is enacted, will it unfairly target minorities? I see no reason why it won’t. And what about smoke from something besides cigarettes?

I’m not sure how a law that makes no mention of race could be seen as targeting a race.

That and considering whites smoke more than AA do...

no they do not https://www.lung.org/stop-smoking/smoking-facts/tobacco-use-racial-and-ethnic.html