Ouch. Doesn’t sound like storm-warning PP is going to find anyone but her shadow for solidarity. |
There is zero room for new housing where I live. Zero open spaces, no land. I remember listening to an NPR piece 10 years ago about how valuable land/property would be exponentially in the future in the close in DC/VA/Md areas. In 10-years, I’ve seen a $400k appreciation in my main property in VA 2.5 miles across boarder of DC. Neighbors that bought 5-7 years before me have seen &1 million, from $400k purchase to $1.4 million value. It’s crazy. |
If you bought 15-17 years ago, before the pre-recession run-up in prices, and held on to your properties, you could expect to see large appreciation in a lot of places further out than this. |
You should get out more. Your bubble is about to pop And pp doesn't sound as liberal as she claims, more like a closet conservative ![]() |
Sorry - I can't and won't ever vote conservative. My friends and family's well-being are far more important to me than lining my own pocket. I just happen to be sitting pretty under this administration and the last one. |
So when that storm comes, the bubbles will pop, will they? I guess you think “normal America” likes bad cliches, too. One right on top of the next. |
Perhaps we need to stop selling our real estate to the Chinese government? |
I'm from the Finger Lakes area (born in Corning). Since when is NY State any part of the Midwest? What the hell are you talking about? |
She’s a Liberal. |
There is always room in one direction -- up |
Not in a city with height restrictions. And not in suburbs with zoning restrictions. There's only one direction -- out. |
Ding, ding, ding. Winner. And also limit all foreign money in real estate. It’s not Americans driving up the cost of real estate. |
Keep judging, you'll look stupid in a few years |
In the long run, we’re all dead. You look stupid now. |
I'm sure there's plenty of room. It's simply a question of tearing down existing SFH housing and replacing it with higher density multifamily housing. If we built on the scale the Victorians did, in higher density urban rows with perhaps apartment blocks at the end of each block, we'd easily accommodate a much higher urban density without much trouble. That's what people manage to do in Europe and survive just fine and dandy. The issue, as the OP's article pointed out, is that there is staunch resistance to rezoning to allow higher density housing in urban areas. And most of that resistance is from liberals who have entrenched interest in not changing zoning regulations, whether they're gentry liberals in Bethesda or urban liberals afraid of gentrification in inner city areas. |