Based on your grammar, you’re the one who is illiterate. |
But not wrong. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1997/08/17/georgetown-basketball-faces-a-philosophy-exam/508c9154-74e1-49f8-b487-e5a469c4c1e9 |
You don't...agree...that I had arty gay guy friends at BC? Do you know me? No, you don't. I graduated in 2007. I did not say BC is "known for 'arty' students." Nevertheless, while there is an UMC, preppy feel to BC, it was diverse enough that there ARE kids who are interested in the arts. I had several friends who majored in Studio Art, Art History, and Art Education programs at BC. My best friend is now a doctor, and was an Art History minor. This does not mean BC is "known" for arty students. It means that there ARE students who are interested in the arts there, and enough of them that it is not a "bro" culture at all. |
Holy crap. That’s pretty stark. |
Notre Dame's endowment is truly big league, higher than half of the Ivy League schools and higher than Duke, Wash U, Chicago, JHU, etc. Georgetown's endowment is more like a small liberal arts college. There's simply no comparison between the two. |
Bill Gates’ kid is going to Chicago though - fingers crossed that he survives the experience and their endowment increases... |
+1 |
Good point. Difference is striking. And plenty of small LACs with bigger endowments per student than Georgetown. Some even bigger than ND’s. |
| No small liberal arts college has an endowment anywhere near the size of ND |
Per student? Haven’t looked at it recently but there were several as of 2017. |
Pretty much every selective LAC has an endowment per student than is multiple times larger than Georgetown’s...which begs the question of why is Georgetown’s endowment so low? |
Notre Dame's larger endowment in no way makes it a better school than Georgetown. They aren't even close. |
I’ll guess you have no intention of providing rationale. Saying stuff on the internet - it’s fun! |
Repeating something over and over again does not a true statement make. |
Nor does denying it over and over with no substantiation. |