Trump Countdown

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the wild card in all of this is Melania. What if she officially leaves or divorces him? That could cause a ruckus.

Honestly it would not be a big deal. It's pretty obvious how much they dislike each othrr
.

If divorced, she can be compelled to testify by Mueller.

Or she can walk in and volunteer. Payback is a b*tch.

Not going to happen. They are back in love. I saw them holding hands on the tarmac.

pp. got that wrong. Not on tarmac, was on Mara Lago property. Little Tiffany stood by gazing adoringly. I guess he let her be his daughter for Easter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the wild card in all of this is Melania. What if she officially leaves or divorces him? That could cause a ruckus.

Honestly it would not be a big deal. It's pretty obvious how much they dislike each othrr
.

If divorced, she can be compelled to testify by Mueller.

Or she can walk in and volunteer. Payback is a b*tch.

Not going to happen. They are back in love. I saw them holding hands on the tarmac.

pp. got that wrong. Not on tarmac, was on Mara Lago property. Little Tiffany stood by gazing adoringly. I guess he let her be his daughter for Easter.

[Anonymous]

Based on some other threads, Kellyanne might be ready to turn on him.

I am sure her attorney husband has her positioned to get legal immunity deal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Based on some other threads, Kellyanne might be ready to turn on him.

I am sure her attorney husband has her positioned to get legal immunity deal.

Add her to the list of people who will turn on him when they are facing potential jaiil time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Based on some other threads, Kellyanne might be ready to turn on him.

I am sure her attorney husband has her positioned to get legal immunity deal.

Add her to the list of people who will turn on him when they are facing potential jaiil time.

Like the Skadden attorney/Oligarch's son who is being sentenced today. The first Trump sentencing Mueller will have under his belt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Something big is coming down this week.

Where have I heard THAT before?

That is how it has worked so far. There will be an apparent lull in investigation for a while and then also of a sudden Mueller has got another big fish.

[Anonymous]

no collusion

https://www.apnews.com/amp/c8d36e8b0b5c42a2a1e43bf43c6507d7?__twitter_impression=true

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:no collusion

https://www.apnews.com/amp/c8d36e8b0b5c42a2a1e43bf43c6507d7?__twitter_impression=true

Your irony is a tad too subtle.

[Anonymous]

Trump is not a criminal target at this point. Also, Mueller is preparing a report on Trump's actions while in office and potential obstruction of justice.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/03/mueller-reportedly-told-trumps-lawyers-the-president-is-not-a-criminal-target-at-this-point.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump is not a criminal target at this point. Also, Mueller is preparing a report on Trump's actions while in office and potential obstruction of justice.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/03/mueller-reportedly-told-trumps-lawyers-the-president-is-not-a-criminal-target-at-this-point.html

Each of your statements is obvious, and certainly known to the types of readers found on this board. So, why did you make them?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:no collusion

https://www.apnews.com/amp/c8d36e8b0b5c42a2a1e43bf43c6507d7?__twitter_impression=true

But but buuuut buuuuuuuuuutttt...... we've had 50,000 threads on DCUM saying they're going to find collusion. It was just a matter of time? But but buuuuut Trump???

V/R,

Confucius

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is not a criminal target at this point. Also, Mueller is preparing a report on Trump's actions while in office and potential obstruction of justice.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/03/mueller-reportedly-told-trumps-lawyers-the-president-is-not-a-criminal-target-at-this-point.html

Each of your statements is obvious, and certainly known to the types of readers found on this board. So, why did you make them?

The first statement is not obvious. They came from Mueller's team, who we don't hear from.very often, so they're significant. Trump is said to be very relieved that he's not a target.

[Anonymous]

He's not a "target" yet.

They are baiting Trump into an interview.

[Anonymous]

Mueller did say Trump is a "subject" of the investigation, so Trump can not claim that he is not under investigation. This also means he can't so much as think of firing Rosenstein or Mueller anymore. Because, oops, direct obstruction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is not a criminal target at this point. Also, Mueller is preparing a report on Trump's actions while in office and potential obstruction of justice.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/03/mueller-reportedly-told-trumps-lawyers-the-president-is-not-a-criminal-target-at-this-point.html

Each of your statements is obvious, and certainly known to the types of readers found on this board. So, why did you make them?

The first statement is not obvious. They came from Mueller's team, who we don't hear from.very often, so they're significant. Trump is said to be very relieved that he's not a target.

“If someone walked into my office and said I was the subject of a multi-year criminal investigation led by former FBI Director Robert Mueller, I’d wet my pants.”
Phil Mudd, former CIA counterterrorism official, to CNN’s Don Lemon