I think you are talking past each other. The PP was simply saying that her daughter got mainly Bs at NCS and, presumably as a result, didn't get into what the parent considers good schools. How does that make her a troll? I am having a similar experience with a child at a similar school. It doesn't mean the schools are bad. But it does understandably make you question whether the school was worth the money for your particular child. And I think that it is worth knowing, as a prospective parent of a kid at a big 3 or similar school, that if your child is an average student at that school, your child may not get into the colleges that you were hoping he or she would get into. |
|
Surely college acceptance isn't the only thing that makes a private school worth the money.
If that's the sole equation, why not go public and send Harvard a check for $100,000 junior year and again senior year? |
Nobody said college acceptance is the only thing. College acceptance isn't the only thing. But it isn't nothing. And it is worth having a realistic assessment of how much of a boost, if any, coming from a prestigious high school will get a child in college admissions. I think a reasonable person could think it is worth the money regardless. But I also think a reasonable person could think it isn't worth the money if it doesn't significantly help with college admissions. Can't both views be ok? |
| Pp - you win the level head award. |
| Hit the books. Tests don't do a thing. |
Plenty of colleges are happy to make that leap of faith. But the most selective ones are already turning away scads of academically super powered applicants so there's not a real reason for them to take the gamble on late bloomer vs. non-starter. |
Not the disappointed parent poster, but many love the UK schools. And it is a fact that they put much more emphasis on tests (including AP results). Let's also remember that the US has scores of wonderful colleges and universities. A record that won't lead to an Ivy will still lead to excellent college choices. But people differ on what they think is acceptable and there are more than a few for who me a top 30 or top 50 college would seem very disappointing. |
| Do the UK schools accept ACT and SAT scores or just the British equivalent? |
They accept U.S. tests. From what I have seen they are as or more interested in subject specific tests (such as the SAT IIs and AP exams) which they appear to see as equivalent to the British-style A levels with which they are familiar. I've seen a couple of instances of a top UK school giving a conditional offer of entry to an American high school senior, saying offer is conditional on student getting 5s on APs in subjects related to the planned UK course of studies (so, for example, asking the student to get 5s on AP Chem and AP Physics). They do not tend to care about extracurriculars terribly much. |
This is consistent with our experience as well. Teacher recommendations are also very important. High school GPA much less important. |
| Fuck me. Should have applied across the pond. No such guidance. |
I love you. |
I remember in the 1980s going to our public high school guidance office and looking up average SAT scores for colleges in some big book, then copying down phone numbers and calling admissions offices and getting applications sent to me in the mail. Sometimes I feel like I grew up in the covered wagon era. But it all worked out.
|
|
Why does the prior poster think that her B daughter who didn't get into a "choice" school would have been better off at a different place than NCS? An A student from a lesser school with the same boards and extracurriculars may not have been admitted at said choice schools either.
|
The UK approach (both to college admissions and once one is there) can be very good for the student who is a star in one area and hates or isn't that strong at another academic area. |