Most of these answers are strongly biased to what the liberal, coastal affluent see in the mirror and, not coincidentally, hope to be an indicator of status. If you polled wealthy energy executives, or ranch owners, about indicators of high SES, you would find very, very different answers. |
I could say the same. People that put a global viewpoint above a national viewpoint are scary to me. |
+1 Travel is a huge indicator of class. |
You know what they say, better to not respond and let people think it's because you're afraid of flying than to open your mouth and prove that you are uneducated. |
I can relate. We actually are working our way around the US with the kids. There is so much to see here! This last summer we did 2 weeks in Alaska, which was such an incredible experience! Being in Denali is almost like being on another planet. We also loved Jackson Hole, WY. We went with an outfitter and took horses down to the bottom of the Grand Canyon and camped, it was unreal. We have a huge map in our study and have tacks where we want to visit, each year we go to at least 2 places (one for a solid 2 weeks). we sprinkle a few 3-4 day weekends in there as well to locations near here. To say the least, we are an outdoors type of family ( we have all boys as well) and have really enjoyed exploring the US. This summer we are looking forward to spending a week in Bar Harbor Maine, and have never been. No real desire to leave the country until we have exhausted what is here. We certainly have the travel bug, but just for the US. The cool thing is that my kids are so well versed in American History. Whenever they are doing a unit in school about some sort of event, we take a trip. For instance, they learned about the battle of Gettysburg and took them to see a battle reenactment and did one of those ghost tours. |
NP, but you sound pretty trite yourself. |
You might find international travel more appealing when your kids get older. They'll take up a language and it'll be fun to use it. Or they will learn about places and it will be great to visit and experience the food and culture. Or they will take a history class and will want to teach YOU about the place they just learned about. Its the same type of fun you're describing above, not about indoctrinating yourself or putting global views above national views or whatever the weirdo PP is suggesting. |
No. Just, no. Ditto for handbags. |
+1 We spend our money on living. |
Oh, I'm sure they might like to travel outside of the US. for now, we just think there is so much in this country to offer and have made some memories of a lifetime right here. WE just haven't found that that the borders have shrunk around us as of yet. Hoping to squeeze in Oneonta Gorge, Oregon in 2016, but we'll see. |
Say that to the Syrian refugees, or the migrant workers we have in this area. They are well traveled. |
This is a little strange. No desire to leave the country? No desire to see Rome, or the Acropolis, or Angkor Wat? I grew up extremely working class (factory working mother and teacher father) and we hit all 50 U.S. states for family vacations. My slightly higher-SES family (DH lawyer, myself in tech) travels domestically, but the kids have had passports since they were 8 weeks old and both have been to a few foreign countries at this point (oldest is 4). Jackson Hole is awesome. But so is Tokyo. So is Giza. So is London. I'd hate to die having only seen a faction of the world's wonders and having only experienced American culture. |
What about it? You are correct. They do not travel frequently for pleasure. |
I'd rather not deal with exhausting long flights and $1200 flights for 5 people. Oh, and like I mentioned we are more outdoors type people, visiting a large city has ZERO appeal, like none at all. I live in DC and went or college at Columbia in NYC...I've had enough. Hiking Mt Kilamanjaro-yes, but I've priced that...20k for all of us, so no. Hiking the Inca trail-yes Patagonioa-yes However for the price of ONE of the above trips I can do 2 domestic trips here and I can see more because the travel time is much shorter. Didn't need a passport ( I do have one though due to business trips I've had to take all over Asia) but we did do a breathtaking trip to Newfoundland. Unless you are independently wealthy you can see all that I desire to see in North America and head off to London and Paris and all the other cliché destinations. |
Okay, now I understand. You're not high-SES, which is what PP said. International travel requires money and time that you don't have. Sad that you have rationalized that world-class cities like London and Tokyo are "cliché" and have apparently written off the 99% of the world that's not urban due to expense. But totally in keeping with your SES and a middle-class worldview. |