Hilary Rosen / Ann Romney

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep, the Titanic sums up Condi, lots of warning signs, but just keep going full speed ahead. People in the know rate her as the worst ever.

yes folks did see her as an empty suit but its been 4 years and she has time to change the narrative on her.

im not going out campaigning for her to be VP. i just think it would be a good strategic pick and be a nice contrast to romney.

there are others out there of course and i honestly think romney's pick isnt going to be one of the usual suspects everyone keeps putting out there (rubio, christie, etc). it wont be a shit pick like palin but it will be somebody under the radar

We like to think the public is dumb, but they really are pretty good at seeing through "narrative" when it comes to a person. You can spin an event, but the average person is good at forming a picture of a person.

[Anonymous]

Who is Sandra "Fluk"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You are crazy - a lot of your babble is nonsensical - for real. I stopped thinking of what to quote because so much of it is gobbley-gook - not even worthy of calling simply "democrat" or "liberal" or even "far left."

Taken as a BIG whole, overall, you are obviously terribly shaken over the whole intravaginal ultrasound before an abortion issue? When is the last time you had an abortion? Do you know how that works? In case you don't, I do - I had one. You see, first they have to make sure there is a baby there. That requires a pee or blood test and a sonogram. So is it a violation of your privacy for a pee or blood test too? Does that go too far? Anyway, after the tests to make sure the baby is there, they stick some medal things WAYYYY up your vagina, past your vagina, and poke them into your cervix. Then, when the cervix opens, they stick a long medical sort of vaccum hose again WAYYYY up your vagina, past it, through the cervix, and into the uterus, and the baby gets sucked into a vaccum - it actually looks like mine at home. So you can forget the whole abortion thing not involving going into your vagina, because it involves going WAYYYYY further up there than that, ok? So if you want to protect your vagina, don't get an abortion.

There is a difference between what a doctor and a woman agree must be done in order to perform an abortion or any other medical procedure. The government are not gynecologist. They should have NO say in what happens to anybody's vagina. Even VA gov McDonell acknowledged this in his statement on the VAGOP wanding plan.

Okay, so you have absolutely no medical reason. Nuff said. You are a very typical far left liberal who will argue and argue and argue any point of contention ad nauseum over "the principle of it" without ever stopping to think in terms of "the reality of it." I am in reality. Reality = abortion = your vajayjay is getting probed BIG TIME regardless of what any GOP has to say. But you can remain in never never land and believe you can have a "Green" "natural" abortion without anyone touching your vajayjay. Fine psycho.

[Anonymous]

democrat war against babies and motherhood.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:democrat war against babies and motherhood.

Yup. You got us. God, I hate babies. And God.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You are crazy - a lot of your babble is nonsensical - for real. I stopped thinking of what to quote because so much of it is gobbley-gook - not even worthy of calling simply "democrat" or "liberal" or even "far left."

Taken as a BIG whole, overall, you are obviously terribly shaken over the whole intravaginal ultrasound before an abortion issue? When is the last time you had an abortion? Do you know how that works? In case you don't, I do - I had one. You see, first they have to make sure there is a baby there. That requires a pee or blood test and a sonogram. So is it a violation of your privacy for a pee or blood test too? Does that go too far? Anyway, after the tests to make sure the baby is there, they stick some medal things WAYYYY up your vagina, past your vagina, and poke them into your cervix. Then, when the cervix opens, they stick a long medical sort of vaccum hose again WAYYYY up your vagina, past it, through the cervix, and into the uterus, and the baby gets sucked into a vaccum - it actually looks like mine at home. So you can forget the whole abortion thing not involving going into your vagina, because it involves going WAYYYYY further up there than that, ok? So if you want to protect your vagina, don't get an abortion.

There is a difference between what a doctor and a woman agree must be done in order to perform an abortion or any other medical procedure. The government are not gynecologist. They should have NO say in what happens to anybody's vagina. Even VA gov McDonell acknowledged this in his statement on the VAGOP wanding plan.

Okay, so you have absolutely no medical reason. Nuff said. You are a very typical far left liberal who will argue and argue and argue any point of contention ad nauseum over "the principle of it" without ever stopping to think in terms of "the reality of it." I am in reality. Reality = abortion = your vajayjay is getting probed BIG TIME regardless of what any GOP has to say. But you can remain in never never land and believe you can have a "Green" "natural" abortion without anyone touching your vajayjay. Fine psycho.

Typical Republican double standard. If you want a gun, the government has no right to record your name and that gun in a central registry. Hey, that infringes my rights! But if you want an abortion, it has the right to mandate a medical procedure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep, the Titanic sums up Condi, lots of warning signs, but just keep going full speed ahead. People in the know rate her as the worst ever.

yes folks did see her as an empty suit but its been 4 years and she has time to change the narrative on her.

im not going out campaigning for her to be VP. i just think it would be a good strategic pick and be a nice contrast to romney.

there are others out there of course and i honestly think romney's pick isnt going to be one of the usual suspects everyone keeps putting out there (rubio, christie, etc). it wont be a shit pick like palin but it will be somebody under the radar

We like to think the public is dumb, but they really are pretty good at seeing through "narrative" when it comes to a person. You can spin an event, but the average person is good at forming a picture of a person.

i dont think the public is informed as they should be because they tend to put blinders on when it comes to someone that represents "their side" which is sad and another story.

like i said, im not cheerleading for rice but i do think within the republican party (which im not part of) i think a pick like rice would get them excited about a romney presidency which can spill into voter turnout and getting people out there to campaign for romney and so forth. dems wont budge and independents may be swayed depending on how they roll someone like rice out and present her to the public