The property tax and business tax on apartment buildings is ludicrously low. Children in apartments don't cost less to educate. |
| Of course they are doing billionaires work. Ezra Klein and Peter Thiel are buddies. It’s all part of the plan. The YIMBYs are just the useful idiots of the left, the analog of the MAGAs on the right. |
LOL let me know when advocating for housing people can afford to buy or rent is a bad thing- and equating that with Christian Nationalism is quite a stretch. |
??? ??? ??? |
Oh no! Affordable housing! How scary! I wonder if you honestly believe this or are just trying to stir the pot. |
+1 |
Housing is already affordable. YIMBYs like to conveniently act as though incomes in this area aren’t astronomical. The median HHI in Moco is about $170k. With the high salaries here, people easily fill up all the apartment buildings that they claim are not affordable. And if you’re at the lower end of the income scale, you can live in an older building, live further out, and/or get a roommate. The options are there. We don’t need to give handouts to developers, change zoning, or manipulate the market to make housing more “affordable” (which paradoxically just raises prices for people who don’t qualify for affordable units). So yes, YIMBYs are idiots. |
To be fair, Christian Nationalists would actually take care of the homeless. We didn't really have a homeless problem until we had a Godless problem. |
The YIMBYs always pivot back to affordable housing when people point out their alignment with corporate interests over consumer interests but then when people point out that YIMBYism hasn’t made housing more affordable they claim they never promised affordable housing. If you’re for affordable housing, great. But if what you advocate for is the interests of capital instead of the interests of people, you’re not really for affordable housing. |
This, but unfortunately one of the trends in the zoning world is to eliminate parking requirements for new developments. They’ll tell you it lowers the cost and therefore makes places more affordable, but in reality developers charge the market rate, pocket the saved money, and now parking is worse all around. Again, dumb local officials duped by their developer overlords. |
I am for affordable housing. I want to make sure we go about it in a logical way that guarantees tangible results, but I’m also concerned that “smart housing” is a buzzword for “no housing” much of the time. |
You seem like the kind of person who would argue that young people can’t afford homes because they spend too much money on UberEats. Guess what? Housing is much pricier today than it was 40 years ago. That’s simply a fact. Government should try to fix that by building more of it. |
You are f-ing delusional. |
More government housing lol |
DP. The broad statements about housing being unaffordable are misleading. It is true that too many people are rent burdened. Few of the programs implemented help these households because they are aimed at market rate housing. It is also true that the price of homes for purchase has gone up too fast. Here again, the programs implemented don’t help prospective buyers. In fact, some of them will decrease the number of homes available for purchase. Median rent in Montgomery County is well below 30 percent of median household income, and over the past two decades, rent increases have been lower than broad inflation on an annualized basis. This suggests that the rental market is in balance or slightly loose. More recently, since rent stabilization took effect, rents have fallen year over year. The two parts that still need to be solved for are low-income, rent-burdened households and stimulating production of homes for purchase, especially townhouses. |