What happened to curing cancer or saving the world?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are less than two years into the Trump poop show. You all asked for this. Because for some reason Kamala was the most horrible person on earth. Not president of her fan club, but she would have maintained some sense of normalcy and decency. Rather than blowing up this great American experiment. Which didn't need blowing up. Definitely needed some tweaking. But not this huge destruction of everything that was good in this country.

But keep watching Fox News for your daily dose of propaganda and thinking everything is hunky dory and Trump is a wonderful man whose sole purpose is to help you and not to line his pockets.

And the first person who replies with "TDS" or whatever else is proving my point and has an IQ of 12.

I voted for kamala but I would have voted for anyone other trump tbh.
But trump didn't win because half the country is suicidal.
He won because those voters didn't think the country needed tweaking, they thought it needed an overhaul.

They were sick of DEI and racial preferences.
White people were afraid that their children would experience downward social mobility under a government that seems super concerned about everyone but them.
The debate surrounding trans ideology had just enough kernels of outrageous incidents to snowball into a moral panic.
The democratic lack of focus on economic issues like inflation reinforced the stereotype that democrats suck at economics, despite all evidence to the contrary.
The coronation of Kamala as the Democratic candidate felt like the coronation of Hillary as the Democratic candidate.

Where do people get this stuff? Hillary won the primary. She had strong results across all demographics. Genuinely who do you think would’ve eclipsed Hillary Clinton? I can’t stand the woman and think she genuinely hates despises most people in this country, but to think she didn’t rightfully win the 2016 primary is borderline conspiratorial.

As she f—king should.

+1

I wish there were a way for the consequences of the Trump administrations to fall squarely - and solely - on those who voted for him.

Natural consequences and an efficient culling of the herd, to the benefit of the rest of us.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are less than two years into the Trump poop show. You all asked for this. Because for some reason Kamala was the most horrible person on earth. Not president of her fan club, but she would have maintained some sense of normalcy and decency. Rather than blowing up this great American experiment. Which didn't need blowing up. Definitely needed some tweaking. But not this huge destruction of everything that was good in this country.

But keep watching Fox News for your daily dose of propaganda and thinking everything is hunky dory and Trump is a wonderful man whose sole purpose is to help you and not to line his pockets.

And the first person who replies with "TDS" or whatever else is proving my point and has an IQ of 12.

I voted for kamala but I would have voted for anyone other trump tbh.
But trump didn't win because half the country is suicidal.
He won because those voters didn't think the country needed tweaking, they thought it needed an overhaul.

They were sick of DEI and racial preferences.
White people were afraid that their children would experience downward social mobility under a government that seems super concerned about everyone but them.
The debate surrounding trans ideology had just enough kernels of outrageous incidents to snowball into a moral panic.
The democratic lack of focus on economic issues like inflation reinforced the stereotype that democrats suck at economics, despite all evidence to the contrary.
The coronation of Kamala as the Democratic candidate felt like the coronation of Hillary as the Democratic candidate.

Where do people get this stuff? Hillary won the primary. She had strong results across all demographics. Genuinely who do you think would’ve eclipsed Hillary Clinton? I can’t stand the woman and think she genuinely hates despises most people in this country, but to think she didn’t rightfully win the 2016 primary is borderline conspiratorial.

As she f—king should.

+1

I wish there were a way for the consequences of the Trump administrations to fall squarely - and solely - on those who voted for him.

Natural consequences and an efficient culling of the herd, to the benefit of the rest of us.

+1

So you're against the social safety net.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

My husband is a cancer researcher with an MD/PhD. I don't know why the PP associates that with Big Pharma - most research is publicly funded and at NIH or other similar institutions.

Since we're in that world, we know plenty of kids who want to be doctors and scientists.

That was my sibling too but only one of their kids do nih funded research (at a major research hospital), and she’s fighting tooth and nail. Their other kids went into industry and are pretty comfortable and also doing important work to help humanity.

I’m not throwing shade at people who go into big pharma. They gave us the shingles vaccine, tremendous advances in cancer drug and diabetes drugs, etc. I’m really upset about what’s happening with nih but pharma has long played a really important part in getting life saving medicines to market. I don’t even really fault pharma on the prices — when you see how much they have to put into labs in order to get one successful product, it’s sort of amazing it doesn’t cost more. And when you compare it to what the defense industry charges for planes or whatever, again it seems like a bargain.

[Anonymous]

I fail to see how this is any different from when I graduated in the 90's.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are less than two years into the Trump poop show. You all asked for this. Because for some reason Kamala was the most horrible person on earth. Not president of her fan club, but she would have maintained some sense of normalcy and decency. Rather than blowing up this great American experiment. Which didn't need blowing up. Definitely needed some tweaking. But not this huge destruction of everything that was good in this country.

But keep watching Fox News for your daily dose of propaganda and thinking everything is hunky dory and Trump is a wonderful man whose sole purpose is to help you and not to line his pockets.

And the first person who replies with "TDS" or whatever else is proving my point and has an IQ of 12.

I voted for kamala but I would have voted for anyone other trump tbh.
But trump didn't win because half the country is suicidal.
He won because those voters didn't think the country needed tweaking, they thought it needed an overhaul.

They were sick of DEI and racial preferences.
White people were afraid that their children would experience downward social mobility under a government that seems super concerned about everyone but them.
The debate surrounding trans ideology had just enough kernels of outrageous incidents to snowball into a moral panic.
The democratic lack of focus on economic issues like inflation reinforced the stereotype that democrats suck at economics, despite all evidence to the contrary.
The coronation of Kamala as the Democratic candidate felt like the coronation of Hillary as the Democratic candidate.

Where do people get this stuff? Hillary won the primary. She had strong results across all demographics. Genuinely who do you think would’ve eclipsed Hillary Clinton? I can’t stand the woman and think she genuinely hates despises most people in this country, but to think she didn’t rightfully win the 2016 primary is borderline conspiratorial.

As she f—king should.

+1

I wish there were a way for the consequences of the Trump administrations to fall squarely - and solely - on those who voted for him.

Natural consequences and an efficient culling of the herd, to the benefit of the rest of us.

+1

You're wishing death to half your countrymen and yet you're supposed to be the "good" one?

I am not impressed.

[Anonymous]

Aren't research dollars dying out? Even if a student had those ambitions, I don't think the opportunity is really there anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are less than two years into the Trump poop show. You all asked for this. Because for some reason Kamala was the most horrible person on earth. Not president of her fan club, but she would have maintained some sense of normalcy and decency. Rather than blowing up this great American experiment. Which didn't need blowing up. Definitely needed some tweaking. But not this huge destruction of everything that was good in this country.

But keep watching Fox News for your daily dose of propaganda and thinking everything is hunky dory and Trump is a wonderful man whose sole purpose is to help you and not to line his pockets.

And the first person who replies with "TDS" or whatever else is proving my point and has an IQ of 12.

I voted for kamala but I would have voted for anyone other trump tbh.
But trump didn't win because half the country is suicidal.
He won because those voters didn't think the country needed tweaking, they thought it needed an overhaul.

They were sick of DEI and racial preferences.
White people were afraid that their children would experience downward social mobility under a government that seems super concerned about everyone but them.
The debate surrounding trans ideology had just enough kernels of outrageous incidents to snowball into a moral panic.
The democratic lack of focus on economic issues like inflation reinforced the stereotype that democrats suck at economics, despite all evidence to the contrary.
The coronation of Kamala as the Democratic candidate felt like the coronation of Hillary as the Democratic candidate.

Where do people get this stuff? Hillary won the primary. She had strong results across all demographics. Genuinely who do you think would’ve eclipsed Hillary Clinton? I can’t stand the woman and think she genuinely hates despises most people in this country, but to think she didn’t rightfully win the 2016 primary is borderline conspiratorial.

As she f—king should.

+1

I wish there were a way for the consequences of the Trump administrations to fall squarely - and solely - on those who voted for him.

Natural consequences and an efficient culling of the herd, to the benefit of the rest of us.

+1

You're wishing death to half your countrymen and yet you're supposed to be the "good" one?

I am not impressed.

No one cares if you’re impressed. Because you’re the problem.

[Anonymous]

The left does not want to teach Algebra. The right does not want to teach Evolution.

Both are idiots. Woke idiots and MAGA cucks.