Actually, Stuart-Hobson has been very competitive the past few years. Last year only 35% were offered a 6th grade seat. That's more competitive than Hardy, John-Francis, and BASIS 5th were. The real path to DCI is through feeder elementaries, so it's not really comparable. |
You can absolutely compare chances of kids not thru feeder for DCI and SH. If you want to move the goalpost and say the route to DCI is thru feeders, same can be used for SH. Just go to JOW. |
There are plenty of these people at Deal, Hardy, Latin, Basis, SH etc. because its DC. But also kind of cringy to point out. There are also many families that struggle at DCI who probably weren’t at your event because they were working. |
Educational executives? In no world do I think that’s an particularly impressive job — especially by DC standards. An actual U.S. Senator has his kid at Stuart-Hobson, so we better all rush off there to keep up with the Joneses now. |
I don’t think so at SH but you just supported above that these types of educated families EOTP are concentrated at acceptable middle schools which are charters. |
Deal and Hardy are not charters. |
This is so funny to me. My high school was twice as large as Jackson Reed and I had zero problems associated with that. |
| I don't disagree that DCPS has problems—major ones—but I don't understand what the charters are really improving on except for allowing families that are engaged in their kids' education to congregate together instead of languishing in smaller cohorts at their neighborhood schools. I'd axe them and fund a magnet GT program. |
They are not EOTP. |
You must be new to the DC school scene. OSSE won’t allow magnet GT because of “equity”. Therefore kids 4 and 5 grade levels apart are grouped together. The achievement gap becomes very obvious once you are past K. What DCPS also does is instead of supporting the bottom and keeping high standards, they lower standards and teach to the bottom. What some charters are able to do since they have a large enough cohort of higher performing kids and not under the control of OSSE is to be able to teach grade level content and above grade level content. Some charters also have tracking official and unofficial so group like ability level kids together in classes. This is especially important as the achievement gap widens even more middle school and up. You can’t do that when the overwhelming majority of kids are not just below grade level but way below grade level. The teaching and resources are then concentrated at those levels. |
+1 Our charter encourages kids to go beyond grade level. The kids compete amongst themselves to see how far above grade level they can get. |
I think this is the same Stuart Hobson booster but if it’s a real post I invite you do so some research on the school. It’s objectively a poor performing school. |
It’s been my experience that people with kids at Stuart Hobson value a comfortable commute and easy classes above all else. Which is fine of course. |
Yes but the cohort of kids are from mediocre schools. No I do not think a kid getting an A at dcps “honors” math is the same as a kid at basis, or the accelerated track at DCI. |
Except some of the kids at Walls get college credits, so what does it matter? Also let’s be real, grades are not everything. I got mediocre grades but I make a great salary. My college was pretty good but not Ivy League. I’d rather my child get good grades sure but also learn actual life skills and get experience/try things they’d like to do. Our kids are going to need a lot more than good grades and a college degree to have a decent living in today’s world. |