Stephen Miller

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.threads.com/@myname.isneo/post/DPfWj8hkoQB?xmt=AQF01js-iV40Sj1EGM6Zc6AEQ7XzdOcKcDoPMRR3wDSk-A&slof=1

This video is incredibly alarming. For those who won’t bother clicking, he said “The president has plenary authority,” and then he completely froze up. No, he didn’t stroke out. He said a term that is said so much in his daily conversations that he forgot not to say it on national tv. Someone in his ear told him to stop talking, and he realized what he had done. Maga, how do you defend this? How does this not scare the crap out of you?

Key characteristics of plenary authority

Completeness: The authority is total and lacks restrictions within its defined area.

Absolute: It is not qualified by external limitations or dependent on others' consent.

Unrestricted: The power is broad and all-encompassing for its designated purpose.
Derived from the Latin term plenus: This means the power is "full" and "complete".

Why is this so alarming to you? It's literally the first sentence of the Executive Branch in the Constitution. Has been since 1790.

Article II. - THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Section 1. The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.

(AKA The Vesting Clause)

Article I is longer than one sentence. You've got to keep reading to know what powers Article II has and does not have.

The president is the boss of the entire executive branch. That's a fact.

You did not read the full article ii

Oh, but I did.

He also doesn't have the power to forgive student debt just because he wants to.

That's a spending item, so it requires the legislative branch to enact that spending (and charge the tax payers for the debt).

And the Biden admin correctly deferred and adjusted course after the supreme court rules against them, i.e.faithful execution of law. You may google this for fact checking.

Why did they try in the first place?

It's a very clear rule.

Why did Trump? The birthright executive order for starters.

Because it is not clearly established....

U.S. Constitution - “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”

https://constitutioncenter.org/education/classroom-resource-library/classroom/14.4-primary-source-united-states-v-wong-kim-ark-1898

That wording is to exclude e.g. children of diplomats. If immigrants are expected to abide by US law and can be charged, they are "subject to the jurisdiction thereof."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.threads.com/@myname.isneo/post/DPfWj8hkoQB?xmt=AQF01js-iV40Sj1EGM6Zc6AEQ7XzdOcKcDoPMRR3wDSk-A&slof=1

This video is incredibly alarming. For those who won’t bother clicking, he said “The president has plenary authority,” and then he completely froze up. No, he didn’t stroke out. He said a term that is said so much in his daily conversations that he forgot not to say it on national tv. Someone in his ear told him to stop talking, and he realized what he had done. Maga, how do you defend this? How does this not scare the crap out of you?

Key characteristics of plenary authority

Completeness: The authority is total and lacks restrictions within its defined area.

Absolute: It is not qualified by external limitations or dependent on others' consent.

Unrestricted: The power is broad and all-encompassing for its designated purpose.
Derived from the Latin term plenus: This means the power is "full" and "complete".

Why is this so alarming to you? It's literally the first sentence of the Executive Branch in the Constitution. Has been since 1790.

Article II. - THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Section 1. The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.

(AKA The Vesting Clause)

Article I is longer than one sentence. You've got to keep reading to know what powers Article II has and does not have.

The president is the boss of the entire executive branch. That's a fact.

You did not read the full article ii

Oh, but I did.

He also doesn't have the power to forgive student debt just because he wants to.

That's a spending item, so it requires the legislative branch to enact that spending (and charge the tax payers for the debt).

And the Biden admin correctly deferred and adjusted course after the supreme court rules against them, i.e.faithful execution of law. You may google this for fact checking.

Why did they try in the first place?

It's a very clear rule.

Why did Trump? The birthright executive order for starters.

Because it is not clearly established....

U.S. Constitution - “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”

Everyone except those specifically excepted (diplomats and Indians on reservations) are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. To take a contrary position means that no illegal immigrant can be prosecuted for any crime because they are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Is that what you want?

[Anonymous]

Stephen Miller is a short-man.

[Anonymous]

This is nuts:

https://www.rawstory.com/stephen-miller-2674261914/uGvsfgM3Q

Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff, and his wife, Katie, felt so threatened by 65-year-old liberal activist Barbara Wien that they had her phone confiscated by Virginia State Police in August, The New York Times reported.

Anyone able to share a non paywall link to the NYT article?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is nuts:

https://www.rawstory.com/stephen-miller-2674261914/uGvsfgM3Q

Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff, and his wife, Katie, felt so threatened by 65-year-old liberal activist Barbara Wien that they had her phone confiscated by Virginia State Police in August, The New York Times reported.

Anyone able to share a non paywall link to the NYT article?

Ask and you shall receive:

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/03/us/politics/stephen-miller-activist-battle-free-speech.html?unlocked_article_code=1.yk8.v_5i.d5nlb00Eh6R3&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is nuts:

https://www.rawstory.com/stephen-miller-2674261914/uGvsfgM3Q

Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff, and his wife, Katie, felt so threatened by 65-year-old liberal activist Barbara Wien that they had her phone confiscated by Virginia State Police in August, The New York Times reported.

Anyone able to share a non paywall link to the NYT article?

Ask and you shall receive:

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/03/us/politics/stephen-miller-activist-battle-free-speech.html?unlocked_article_code=1.yk8.v_5i.d5nlb00Eh6R3&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

it’s a gift link ☝️

[Anonymous]

He’s a short troll.

[Anonymous]

Miller is a total wimp! Chalk message from a female Boomer is a threat to his life? What a total drama queen!

[Anonymous]

His wife that has picked up his speaking style and general evil esthetic threatens to lookinto the citizenship applications of individuals that offend her. I wonder how their kids will turn out?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:His wife that has picked up his speaking style and general evil esthetic threatens to lookinto the citizenship applications of individuals that offend her. I wonder how their kids will turn out?

You are giving the witch too much credit. She was probably already evil.

[Anonymous]

Total overreaction and abuse of power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His wife that has picked up his speaking style and general evil esthetic threatens to lookinto the citizenship applications of individuals that offend her. I wonder how their kids will turn out?

You are giving the witch too much credit. She was probably already evil.

People who have known her thinks she is a sociopath.

[Anonymous]

It’s weird because everyone knew they lived there for a long time. It wasn’t some big secret. There were always several secret service vehicles and a cut through road went right by their house. I saw them out front regularly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And apparently Trump is afraid of him, which is why Trump is not reining in ICE despite how angry the public seems to be about their tactics.

The angry people are liberals who hate everything he does.

Correct. We are VERY angry, and you’ll be regretting it for years to come.

Well, we were very angry about what Biden was doing on immigration, and liberals seem to be regretting it when all of their open borders policies were reversed. Thank God for Trump and ICE for restoring law and order to this country!

"Open borders" - DRINK!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Miller is a total wimp! Chalk message from a female Boomer is a threat to his life? What a total drama queen!

To watch the reaction of supporters every time someone wrote chalk message or yarn-bombed a right wing figure's house, you'd think Antifa was shooting into the home with AK-47s.