Is Frumin running again?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would suggest that you look at ANC precincts that have been affected by policies promoted by Frumin. Crime in ANC 3F, for example, from 22-25 (roughly overlapping with Frumin’s tenure) is up more than 30 percent compared to the previous 3 years.
This is according to DC govt data.


https://crimecards.dc.gov/all:crimes/all:weapons/3:years/in:ANC:3F

Other precincts track similarly in the Connecticut Ave corridor most affected by these policies. Importantly, this is at a time when crime decreased elsewhere in DC. Check your own Ward 3 ANC precinct and see how it scores.

What a dumb post.

ANC's have zero influence or crime or any policies generally.

ANC's can influence the tone around zoning and liquor license applications but ultimately don't even decide those.

Oh and Frumin was briefly an ANC Commissioner in 3E so his non influential stint as an ANC Commissioner most definitely didn't influence a neighborhood he didn't represent.

Ward 3 ANCs were very involved with attempting to prop up the embarrassing BLM/Police Reform era in DC. This misguided effort became a national embarrassment that set DC statehood back years. This is Frumins constituency.

https://anc3c.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/ANC3C-Resolution-2021-012-in-Support-of-Proposals-by-DC-Police-Reform-Commission-Report-1.pdf

You mean supporting proposals literally from the DC police reform commission?

Yes, the Commission that issued a report calling to “decenter” the police in public safety (aka, defund). Why on earth would our ANC support that dumpster fire?

Lol. It passed unanimously.

And saying decenter means defund is disingenuous. You certainly aren't arguing in good faith.

LOL! The report called for shifting police resources to treatment and rehab. You know, the same programs that have done such an awesome job with the voucher residents along Connecticut Ave. Good grief why would the ANCs support this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would suggest that you look at ANC precincts that have been affected by policies promoted by Frumin. Crime in ANC 3F, for example, from 22-25 (roughly overlapping with Frumin’s tenure) is up more than 30 percent compared to the previous 3 years.
This is according to DC govt data.


https://crimecards.dc.gov/all:crimes/all:weapons/3:years/in:ANC:3F

Other precincts track similarly in the Connecticut Ave corridor most affected by these policies. Importantly, this is at a time when crime decreased elsewhere in DC. Check your own Ward 3 ANC precinct and see how it scores.

What a dumb post.

ANC's have zero influence or crime or any policies generally.

ANC's can influence the tone around zoning and liquor license applications but ultimately don't even decide those.

Oh and Frumin was briefly an ANC Commissioner in 3E so his non influential stint as an ANC Commissioner most definitely didn't influence a neighborhood he didn't represent.

Ward 3 ANCs were very involved with attempting to prop up the embarrassing BLM/Police Reform era in DC. This misguided effort became a national embarrassment that set DC statehood back years. This is Frumins constituency.

https://anc3c.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/ANC3C-Resolution-2021-012-in-Support-of-Proposals-by-DC-Police-Reform-Commission-Report-1.pdf

You mean supporting proposals literally from the DC police reform commission?

Yes, the Commission that issued a report calling to “decenter” the police in public safety (aka, defund). Why on earth would our ANC support that dumpster fire?

Lol. It passed unanimously.

And saying decenter means defund is disingenuous. You certainly aren't arguing in good faith.

LOL! The report called for shifting police resources to treatment and rehab. You know, the same programs that have done such an awesome job with the voucher residents along Connecticut Ave. Good grief why would the ANCs support this?

If someone is havning a mental health breakdown, who is it better to be there to deal with it, a mental health professional or a policeman? If there is a car blocking a lane, who is better to be there, a tow truck or a police man? This is what "decenter" means. Stop being willfully obtuse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would suggest that you look at ANC precincts that have been affected by policies promoted by Frumin. Crime in ANC 3F, for example, from 22-25 (roughly overlapping with Frumin’s tenure) is up more than 30 percent compared to the previous 3 years.
This is according to DC govt data.


https://crimecards.dc.gov/all:crimes/all:weapons/3:years/in:ANC:3F

Other precincts track similarly in the Connecticut Ave corridor most affected by these policies. Importantly, this is at a time when crime decreased elsewhere in DC. Check your own Ward 3 ANC precinct and see how it scores.

What a dumb post.

ANC's have zero influence or crime or any policies generally.

ANC's can influence the tone around zoning and liquor license applications but ultimately don't even decide those.

Oh and Frumin was briefly an ANC Commissioner in 3E so his non influential stint as an ANC Commissioner most definitely didn't influence a neighborhood he didn't represent.

Ward 3 ANCs were very involved with attempting to prop up the embarrassing BLM/Police Reform era in DC. This misguided effort became a national embarrassment that set DC statehood back years. This is Frumins constituency.

https://anc3c.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/ANC3C-Resolution-2021-012-in-Support-of-Proposals-by-DC-Police-Reform-Commission-Report-1.pdf

You mean supporting proposals literally from the DC police reform commission?

Yes, the Commission that issued a report calling to “decenter” the police in public safety (aka, defund). Why on earth would our ANC support that dumpster fire?

Lol. It passed unanimously.

And saying decenter means defund is disingenuous. You certainly aren't arguing in good faith.

LOL! The report called for shifting police resources to treatment and rehab. You know, the same programs that have done such an awesome job with the voucher residents along Connecticut Ave. Good grief why would the ANCs support this?

If someone is havning a mental health breakdown, who is it better to be there to deal with it, a mental health professional or a policeman? If there is a car blocking a lane, who is better to be there, a tow truck or a police man? This is what "decenter" means. Stop being willfully obtuse.

This progressive fantasy of making perfect the enemy of the good is killing American cities. But, go on.

[Anonymous]

When I wrote to him about rising crime, he didn’t respond. Others had a similar experience. Who is representing, actually?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would suggest that you look at ANC precincts that have been affected by policies promoted by Frumin. Crime in ANC 3F, for example, from 22-25 (roughly overlapping with Frumin’s tenure) is up more than 30 percent compared to the previous 3 years.
This is according to DC govt data.


https://crimecards.dc.gov/all:crimes/all:weapons/3:years/in:ANC:3F

Other precincts track similarly in the Connecticut Ave corridor most affected by these policies. Importantly, this is at a time when crime decreased elsewhere in DC. Check your own Ward 3 ANC precinct and see how it scores.

What a dumb post.

ANC's have zero influence or crime or any policies generally.

ANC's can influence the tone around zoning and liquor license applications but ultimately don't even decide those.

Oh and Frumin was briefly an ANC Commissioner in 3E so his non influential stint as an ANC Commissioner most definitely didn't influence a neighborhood he didn't represent.

Ward 3 ANCs were very involved with attempting to prop up the embarrassing BLM/Police Reform era in DC. This misguided effort became a national embarrassment that set DC statehood back years. This is Frumins constituency.

https://anc3c.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/ANC3C-Resolution-2021-012-in-Support-of-Proposals-by-DC-Police-Reform-Commission-Report-1.pdf

You mean supporting proposals literally from the DC police reform commission?

Yes, the Commission that issued a report calling to “decenter” the police in public safety (aka, defund). Why on earth would our ANC support that dumpster fire?

Lol. It passed unanimously.

And saying decenter means defund is disingenuous. You certainly aren't arguing in good faith.

LOL! The report called for shifting police resources to treatment and rehab. You know, the same programs that have done such an awesome job with the voucher residents along Connecticut Ave. Good grief why would the ANCs support this?

If someone is havning a mental health breakdown, who is it better to be there to deal with it, a mental health professional or a policeman? If there is a car blocking a lane, who is better to be there, a tow truck or a police man? This is what "decenter" means. Stop being willfully obtuse.

This progressive fantasy of making perfect the enemy of the good is killing American cities. But, go on.

Really? Crime is down nationally in American cities and particularly in DC, SF, NY and Chicago. Per capital crime is much higher in red states, but go on with your MAGA fantasies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would suggest that you look at ANC precincts that have been affected by policies promoted by Frumin. Crime in ANC 3F, for example, from 22-25 (roughly overlapping with Frumin’s tenure) is up more than 30 percent compared to the previous 3 years.
This is according to DC govt data.


https://crimecards.dc.gov/all:crimes/all:weapons/3:years/in:ANC:3F

Other precincts track similarly in the Connecticut Ave corridor most affected by these policies. Importantly, this is at a time when crime decreased elsewhere in DC. Check your own Ward 3 ANC precinct and see how it scores.

What a dumb post.

ANC's have zero influence or crime or any policies generally.

ANC's can influence the tone around zoning and liquor license applications but ultimately don't even decide those.

Oh and Frumin was briefly an ANC Commissioner in 3E so his non influential stint as an ANC Commissioner most definitely didn't influence a neighborhood he didn't represent.

Ward 3 ANCs were very involved with attempting to prop up the embarrassing BLM/Police Reform era in DC. This misguided effort became a national embarrassment that set DC statehood back years. This is Frumins constituency.

https://anc3c.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/ANC3C-Resolution-2021-012-in-Support-of-Proposals-by-DC-Police-Reform-Commission-Report-1.pdf

You mean supporting proposals literally from the DC police reform commission?

Yes, the Commission that issued a report calling to “decenter” the police in public safety (aka, defund). Why on earth would our ANC support that dumpster fire?

Lol. It passed unanimously.

And saying decenter means defund is disingenuous. You certainly aren't arguing in good faith.

LOL! The report called for shifting police resources to treatment and rehab. You know, the same programs that have done such an awesome job with the voucher residents along Connecticut Ave. Good grief why would the ANCs support this?

If someone is havning a mental health breakdown, who is it better to be there to deal with it, a mental health professional or a policeman? If there is a car blocking a lane, who is better to be there, a tow truck or a police man? This is what "decenter" means. Stop being willfully obtuse.

This progressive fantasy of making perfect the enemy of the good is killing American cities. But, go on.

Really? Crime is down nationally in American cities and particularly in DC, SF, NY and Chicago. Per capital crime is much higher in red states, but go on with your MAGA fantasies.

Ah, yes. The crime is not a problem in DC trope. A favorite of the Ward 3 woke mob who are rarely the victims of the violence. If they aren’t victimized, it’s not a problem.

And if it is, Frumin will suggest midnight pickleball.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would suggest that you look at ANC precincts that have been affected by policies promoted by Frumin. Crime in ANC 3F, for example, from 22-25 (roughly overlapping with Frumin’s tenure) is up more than 30 percent compared to the previous 3 years.
This is according to DC govt data.


https://crimecards.dc.gov/all:crimes/all:weapons/3:years/in:ANC:3F

Other precincts track similarly in the Connecticut Ave corridor most affected by these policies. Importantly, this is at a time when crime decreased elsewhere in DC. Check your own Ward 3 ANC precinct and see how it scores.

What a dumb post.

ANC's have zero influence or crime or any policies generally.

ANC's can influence the tone around zoning and liquor license applications but ultimately don't even decide those.

Oh and Frumin was briefly an ANC Commissioner in 3E so his non influential stint as an ANC Commissioner most definitely didn't influence a neighborhood he didn't represent.

Ward 3 ANCs were very involved with attempting to prop up the embarrassing BLM/Police Reform era in DC. This misguided effort became a national embarrassment that set DC statehood back years. This is Frumins constituency.

https://anc3c.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/ANC3C-Resolution-2021-012-in-Support-of-Proposals-by-DC-Police-Reform-Commission-Report-1.pdf

You mean supporting proposals literally from the DC police reform commission?

Yes, the Commission that issued a report calling to “decenter” the police in public safety (aka, defund). Why on earth would our ANC support that dumpster fire?

Lol. It passed unanimously.

And saying decenter means defund is disingenuous. You certainly aren't arguing in good faith.

LOL! The report called for shifting police resources to treatment and rehab. You know, the same programs that have done such an awesome job with the voucher residents along Connecticut Ave. Good grief why would the ANCs support this?

If someone is havning a mental health breakdown, who is it better to be there to deal with it, a mental health professional or a policeman? If there is a car blocking a lane, who is better to be there, a tow truck or a police man? This is what "decenter" means. Stop being willfully obtuse.

This progressive fantasy of making perfect the enemy of the good is killing American cities. But, go on.

Really? Crime is down nationally in American cities and particularly in DC, SF, NY and Chicago. Per capital crime is much higher in red states, but go on with your MAGA fantasies.

Crime is down, but at a huge cost to quality of life in the cities where anything of value is locked up and public nuisance crimes were decriminalized. We all can see this in our day to day lives.

[Anonymous]

Doesn’t really matter.

Load on two feet.

The ultimate pick-me girl.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:


Really? Crime is down nationally in American cities and particularly in DC, SF, NY and Chicago. Per capital crime is much higher in red states, but go on with your MAGA fantasies.


Crime is down, but at a huge cost to quality of life in the cities where anything of value is locked up and public nuisance crimes were decriminalized. We all can see this in our day to day lives.
report

Absolutely. I live in the Adams Morgan/MtP/Columbia Heights area. While we have to find a clerk to unlock a case at CVS in Adams Morgan so we can buy toothpaste, the unregulated street vendors (thanks Brianne!) at the corner of Irving and 16th sell all the massively shoplifted household items arrayed on blankets on the sidewalk. Then you have the mentally ill street people who set up their own lodging on the sidewalk on MtP Street using those huge square insulated bags from grocery deliveries. Weed smell permeates everywhere. There was a brief period (pre-Brianne) in 2008-2014 when Columbia Heights was actually decent to walk to---now I avoid it whenever possible. When I moved to Dupont/Adams Morgan in the mid 90s, there were always panhandlers in front of the 7-11 but the explosion of the mentally ill setting up their own encampments was not a thing. And yes, encampments are down from 3 years ago but that's because the city handed out housing vouchers for the long term mentally ill and drug addicted to go live along Conn. Ave where there is absolutely no requirement that they accept services and supervision in exchange for housing. Yes, it is better to have a mental health worker handle someone having a mental health crisis but that is NOT what re-allocating funds will go toward. The city does not have enough mental health workers and no realistic plans to change that, or to tie housing to acceptance of services---if there WERE services.

[Anonymous]

If you live in Ward 1 say goodbye to CVS and restaurants.

Thanks Brianne.

[Anonymous]

Adrian Fenty was never a serious, or smart for that matter, person.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. I don't think he is horrible - but given Council's particular history, the bar is low. He is at least not a willing lapdog for the DC Chamber.

Oddly in the early 2000's we had a pretty decent Council. Carol Schwartz, David Cantania, Vincent Grey, Jim Graham, and Adrian Fenty were all serious people. Jack Evans wasn't the most ethical politician, but he was at least a sensible voice on the council. Now it's a clown show.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I generally agree with Matt and his office provides good constituent services, but he really hasn’t accomplished much in his time on the Council. Mary Cheh had an annoying tendency to talk out of both sides of her mouth, but was much more effective at getting things done.

She was head of a very influential committee for 12 years. Frumin hasn't had any committee power at all.

But yes, I would expect he will run again and I expect he will win.

Frumin is Chair of Human Services.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Adrian Fenty was never a serious, or smart for that matter, person.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. I don't think he is horrible - but given Council's particular history, the bar is low. He is at least not a willing lapdog for the DC Chamber.

Oddly in the early 2000's we had a pretty decent Council. Carol Schwartz, David Cantania, Vincent Grey, Jim Graham, and Adrian Fenty were all serious people. Jack Evans wasn't the most ethical politician, but he was at least a sensible voice on the council. Now it's a clown show.

Of that list, only Schwartz and Grey were both ethical and serious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I generally agree with Matt and his office provides good constituent services, but he really hasn’t accomplished much in his time on the Council. Mary Cheh had an annoying tendency to talk out of both sides of her mouth, but was much more effective at getting things done.

She was head of a very influential committee for 12 years. Frumin hasn't had any committee power at all.

But yes, I would expect he will run again and I expect he will win.

Frumin is Chair of Human Services.

As of this year. The first two years, freshman councilmembers do not get committees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I generally agree with Matt and his office provides good constituent services, but he really hasn’t accomplished much in his time on the Council. Mary Cheh had an annoying tendency to talk out of both sides of her mouth, but was much more effective at getting things done.

She was head of a very influential committee for 12 years. Frumin hasn't had any committee power at all.

But yes, I would expect he will run again and I expect he will win.

Frumin is Chair of Human Services.

Give me one concrete example of something he has accomplished in that role, or even one thing he’s done to improve the quality of life for his W3 constituents during his time in office.