Please elaborate what constitutes foreign assistance. Why those foreign countries with problems feeding people care about all those dancing programs by USAID? |
+ another 10000000000 I'll keep posting this on threads all over the place until I'm blue in the face. It's the process everyone should be paying attention to, not just the outcome. Our democracy is built on a constitution and rule of law, and when you eliminate those, despite being happy with the outcome, you're an ignorant fool. |
You cannot make this stuff up! Oh let’s not fund a coup or terrorist organization in Africa, but we’re totally fine having someone buy the US presidency if he stops giving $$ to grifters. |
So now he’s going to shut down Venmo? Lovely. |
So. . . sort of like this: A construction company that has been repeatedly touted by President Donald Trump and his allies has been awarded a major border wall construction contract valued at more than $1.2 billion, a US Army Corps of Engineers spokesperson told CNN on Tuesday. (CNN) Fisher all built a wall on private land using Build the Wall donations (Bannon convicted of fraud IIRC), which led to this: Constructed on private land along a Rio Grande River bank near Mission, Texas, the wall's risks came to light in a 2019 lawsuit filed by the US Justice Dept. It charged that the $42-million steel bollard fence fence was showing signs of erosion and instability and was in violation of a treaty with Mexico under the International Boundary and Water Commission because of flood risks to the river flow. Texas officials and an adjacent non-profit wildlife center also sued over the project. Under the federal agreement approved in US district court on May 31, Fisher and its units and affiliates must properly maintain the structure for 15 years. They also must repair defects such as bollards that lean more than 6° out of alignment, repair cracks in the foundation more than 3 in. wide and address any erosion under the footers or settlement of the foundation. https://www.enr.com/articles/54215-us-settles-border-wall-suit-against-contractor-fisher-sand-gravel Fisher Sand and Gravel had great GOP connections. It also had a history: According to information compiled by Good Jobs First, a policy resource center that promotes corporate and government accountability, Fisher Sand and Gravel has been fined 16 times by the Environmental Protection Agency since 2000 and has paid more than $430,000 in fines. The largest was $150,000 in 2013, when the EPA found the company failed to comply with dust mitigation regulations at facilities in Maricopa County, Arizona. I believe ultimately Fisher had more fines than that. Also had to reorganize the company at one point because of a child porn/assault conviction by one of its officers |
Everything Musk is doing is illegal. Everything Trump is doing is illegal. When Biden and Obama were Presidents all you clowns said they did not have authority to do anything without an act of Congress. What happened to your "principles" and "beliefs" and your "worship of law and order"? Was that all bullshit? |
Thank you for the informative post. I did some digging on the Google machine and found out a little more about USAID. Why is an aid agency creating a fake twitter to destabilize Cuba? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/03/us-cuban-twitter-zunzuneo-stir-unrest I get politics is dirty, and geopolitics even dirtier, but couldn’t this have been done with another agency as to not taint the reputation of US foreign aid? |
Now you are talking about rule of law .... how about deportation? |
where is steve bannon! He promised Musk would be out before inauguration. This is a serious question. Where are the right wingers who hate Musk? |
Oh please. Do you even need to ask? Of course he's lying. |
Ahhhh
Elon's disinformation crew has arrived, trying to direct the narrative away from HOW USAID was closed to trying to overwhelm the conversation to why USAID was closed. Yawn. This is trolling 101. Again, DOGE was only established to RECOMMEND changes to the government, not to have unilateral power to close office and fire civil servants. Not even the president can give them that power. |
So, are the congresspeople going to the courts now? What's the next step? |
Agree. The arrogance accompanied by total ignorance is astounding. |
Come on. This just rings so hollow. Our country has an extremely long history of individual and collective action that breaks or bends then prevailing law—all the way back to the country’s founding fathers who knew they were risking their lives in declaring independence. This goes all the way from the trivial (Harry Reid intentionally misleadingly insinuating that Mitt Romney was a tax cheat from the Senate floor—and laughing about it no less) to the most important issues (John Lewis and his good trouble). Indeed, we’re less than 8 years removed from an FBI director leaking stories to the press, an FBI agent altering evidence in a warrant application and, as we speak, purported FBI agents are sharing details with each other on social media on how to anonymously leak information they are not authorized to disclose. My guess is that you are mostly supportive of these ethical and legal lapses (hopefully not on the warrant business), but we are to believe that all of a sudden you really care about the rule of law and process? The left can’t spend the first Trump presidency declaring that he is such a unique threat to democracy that institutional guardrails should be ignored and then come back and assert institutional guardrails. It just has no credibility. I’m not happy about violation of the law and institutional guardrails being ignored. But this has been happening for the better part of my adult life dating back to the second Bush administration. Why should we care now? Because this time it is different? Maybe you are right and this is the time to care. But after decades of this garbage, across both political parties, I just can’t… |
What are you even talking about? |