Harris declines to invite Vance for courtesy visit to vice president's residence before inauguration

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The kind thing to do would be to allow the kids to see the house, pick bedrooms, and ease some of their anxiety with the big move.

This is the problem with norms being shattered. You can make anyone go back to the ways things used to be done.

+1. The current President-elect attempted a coup and is a complete dick to boot. MAGA didn't want politics as usual yet still expects it. Too bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's no surprise that the worst candidate is also the worst loser.

Did you forget Jan 6, 2021?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's no surprise that the worst candidate is also the worst loser.

but she imported millions of cheap illegal labor for her masters. way to go.

and lost to an idiot like trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It seems petty to not allow Usha Vance to swing by and check out the home for her three kids for the next four years.

They deserve nothing from Harris. They don’t need to move the kids in on day one anyway. Biden has already been far too polite as it is. The primary lesson for the dems to learn from republican success is there’s no room for class, consideration and truthfulness. They need to get down to the republican level if they want to succeed in the future.

Lol. Dems won’t learn a thing.

Probably not. With liberals the priorities tend to be about communal wellbeing, being considerate to others and all that. With conservatives it’s all about me and everyone else can stuff it. No holds barred. That kind of stuff doesn’t come easily to fair minded people .

there you go again, ignoring recent history.

stop the overwhelming immigration and Democrats would be in control but they would rather import millions of cheap workers to lower US wages.

Biden/Harris created the disaster. And expanded immigration thru out their entire term.

In his first 100 days in office, Biden signed more than 60 executive actions, 24 of which are direct reversals of Trump’s policies.
Biden has defended the number as necessary to undo what he considers “bad policy” inherited from Trump, especially on immigration.
To date, 10 of his 12 actions on immigration are reversals of Trump’s policies.

“And I want to make it clear — there’s a lot of talk, with good reason, about the number of executive orders that I have signed — I’m not making new law; I’m eliminating bad policy,” Biden said as he signed a series of actions on immigration from the Oval Office on February 2. “What I’m doing is taking on the issues that — 99% of them — that the president, the last president of the United States, issued executive orders I felt were very counterproductive to our security, counterproductive to who we are as a country, particularly in the area of immigration.”

https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2021/politics/biden-executive-orders/

papa Biden 1 - https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2024/06/06/biden-immigration-asylum-policy-migrant-family/

papa Biden 2 - https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/interactive/2024/immigration-journey-venezuela-trump-harris-election/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And, let's not forget here, Trump had the narrowest win EVER, with LESS than 50% of the vote.

It’s astounding that Democrats still haven’t figured out how U.S. presidents are elected. This election was NOT the narrowest win ever. I’d say nice try, but it wasn’t. Trump’s EC margin of victory was larger than Biden’s in 2020.

[Anonymous]

She was raised in a middle class household.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And, let's not forget here, Trump had the narrowest win EVER, with LESS than 50% of the vote.

It’s astounding that Democrats still haven’t figured out how U.S. presidents are elected. This election was NOT the narrowest win ever. I’d say nice try, but it wasn’t. Trump’s EC margin of victory was larger than Biden’s in 2020.

It’s astounding that you don’t understand the difference between votes and the electoral college. He won by 114,000 votes split between three states. Those votes would have given her the electoral win. Third tightest race in history. Nothing to brag about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s astounding that you don’t understand the difference between votes and the electoral college. He won by 114,000 votes split between three states. Those votes would have given her the electoral win. Third tightest race in history. Nothing to brag about.

Every swing state. She spent $1.5B. Keep concentrating on the “popular” vote. She lost that too. No joy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And, let's not forget here, Trump had the narrowest win EVER, with LESS than 50% of the vote.

It’s astounding that Democrats still haven’t figured out how U.S. presidents are elected. This election was NOT the narrowest win ever. I’d say nice try, but it wasn’t. Trump’s EC margin of victory was larger than Biden’s in 2020.

Who cares? By 2030 we'll have forgotten about the political embarrassment between 2016 and 2028. Presumably by 2028 voters will have learned their lesson regarding electing unfit presidents and we will have a legitimate leader once again by 2030. If we elect another Trump/Biden in 2028, I'm giving up.

[Anonymous]

Good! We need to stop with the “when they you low, we go high” mentality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can’t picture Jackie Kennedy asking Mamie Eisenhower to help her figure out the logistics of baby proofing as she moved into a dilapidated WH with a 3 year old and a newborn.

Jackie Kennedy had class and breeding. Comparing her to JD and Usha Vance is comparing a thoroughbred race horse to pack mules.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The double standard is killing me.

Remember last time when the previous administration threw a temper tantrum and stormed off? Now KH is expected to roll out a red carpet for the Vances? I don't think so.

But you keep saying the democrats are the adults and always go high.

This is just more proof of that hypocrisy.

When dealing with guttersnipes you have to get dirty.




r

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The kind thing to do would be to allow the kids to see the house, pick bedrooms, and ease some of their anxiety with the big move.

They can do that the day they move in. As I recall, her mother is their slave.

Usha Vance's mother is a Provost and Professor of Molecular Biology at UCSD. I think her childcare days are over.
https://biology.ucsd.edu/research/faculty/lchilukuri

Well her son-in-law thinks she's washed up since she's post-menopausal and watching kids is all she's good for. So, we'll see.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It seems petty to not allow Usha Vance to swing by and check out the home for her three kids for the next four years.

They deserve nothing from Harris. They don’t need to move the kids in on day one anyway. Biden has already been far too polite as it is. The primary lesson for the dems to learn from republican success is there’s no room for class, consideration and truthfulness. They need to get down to the republican level if they want to succeed in the future.

Lol. Dems won’t learn a thing.

Probably not. With liberals the priorities tend to be about communal wellbeing, being considerate to others and all that. With conservatives it’s all about me and everyone else can stuff it. No holds barred. That kind of stuff doesn’t come easily to fair minded people .

there you go again, ignoring recent history.

stop the overwhelming immigration and Democrats would be in control but they would rather import millions of cheap workers to lower US wages.

Biden/Harris created the disaster. And expanded immigration thru out their entire term.

In his first 100 days in office, Biden signed more than 60 executive actions, 24 of which are direct reversals of Trump’s policies.
Biden has defended the number as necessary to undo what he considers “bad policy” inherited from Trump, especially on immigration.
To date, 10 of his 12 actions on immigration are reversals of Trump’s policies.

“And I want to make it clear — there’s a lot of talk, with good reason, about the number of executive orders that I have signed — I’m not making new law; I’m eliminating bad policy,” Biden said as he signed a series of actions on immigration from the Oval Office on February 2. “What I’m doing is taking on the issues that — 99% of them — that the president, the last president of the United States, issued executive orders I felt were very counterproductive to our security, counterproductive to who we are as a country, particularly in the area of immigration.”

https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2021/politics/biden-executive-orders/

papa Biden 1 - https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2024/06/06/biden-immigration-asylum-policy-migrant-family/

papa Biden 2 - https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/interactive/2024/immigration-journey-venezuela-trump-harris-election/

I’m guessing you clicked the wrong quote button because your reply has nothing to do with what you replied to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And, let's not forget here, Trump had the narrowest win EVER, with LESS than 50% of the vote.

It’s astounding that Democrats still haven’t figured out how U.S. presidents are elected. This election was NOT the narrowest win ever. I’d say nice try, but it wasn’t. Trump’s EC margin of victory was larger than Biden’s in 2020.

Who cares? By 2030 we'll have forgotten about the political embarrassment between 2016 and 2028. Presumably by 2028 voters will have learned their lesson regarding electing unfit presidents and we will have a legitimate leader once again by 2030. If we elect another Trump/Biden in 2028, I'm giving up.

Uh, don't think so. It will take decades to get rid of their stench (and policies).