Kamala Harris Says Anyone Who Breaks Into Her House Is ‘Getting Shot’

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is so incredibly stupid of her.

Doesn’t she understand, during a break in, the gun will just get taken away from her and used against her?

+ 1

Everyone knows this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is so incredibly stupid of her.

Doesn’t she understand, during a break in, the gun will just get taken away from her and used against her?

+2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reminder to some of the PPs above, Kamala Harris has been Vice President, a United States Senator, and Attorney General of the most populous, diverse state in our union. She's got more foreign policy experience than any president had since at least 1989, when George H.W. Bush was inaugurated. Spare us the "unqualified" B.S. If she's unqualified, then no president in my lifetime has been qualified.

And on guns, she reminds me of nearly every gun owner I know -- and I know many -- in that she understand one can own a gun and still advocate for reasonable restrictions, any suggestion to the contrary is utterly false.

She owns a freaking HANDGUN

yelling HANGUN doesn't turn it into an AK-47 or a UZI. It’s the appropriate self defense weapon for non-hunters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is so incredibly stupid of her.

Doesn’t she understand, during a break in, the gun will just get taken away from her and used against her?

+ 1

Everyone knows this.

Statistically, it would be used against her *If she doesn’t have appropriate training*. Does she really impress you as someone who would get threats, get a handgun, and not bother to to get good training and periodically go to the gun range? She’s been over prepared for everything in her life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is so incredibly stupid of her.

Doesn’t she understand, during a break in, the gun will just get taken away from her and used against her?

+ 1

Everyone knows this.

Because she’s the sort of person to not get decent training and to freeze in stressful situations and not act? Seriously?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How does this work with the NRA is the devil crowd? Is there a middle ground in America on gun ownership? I believe in gun control, mandatory training, background checks, locking weapons. I do think it's OK to have a gun for hunting, sport or security if you pass all those hoops.

Everyone with at least half a brain thinks owning a traditional shotgun or six-shooter for the reasons you mention is OK. Screw the NRA. Citizens don't need access to military rifles. None of this rocket science.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does this work with the NRA is the devil crowd? Is there a middle ground in America on gun ownership? I believe in gun control, mandatory training, background checks, locking weapons. I do think it's OK to have a gun for hunting, sport or security if you pass all those hoops.

Everyone with at least half a brain thinks owning a traditional shotgun or six-shooter for the reasons you mention is OK. Screw the NRA. Citizens don't need access to military rifles. None of this rocket science.

+1 million

[Anonymous]

She said she would let her staff “clean it up” 9instead of owning her statement while she’s saying it).

Staff now saying she was just joking.

Guess you thought it was a serious issue. Not to her! She’ll just commit gun violence. Hahaha….

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does this work with the NRA is the devil crowd? Is there a middle ground in America on gun ownership? I believe in gun control, mandatory training, background checks, locking weapons. I do think it's OK to have a gun for hunting, sport or security if you pass all those hoops.

Everyone with at least half a brain thinks owning a traditional shotgun or six-shooter for the reasons you mention is OK. Screw the NRA. Citizens don't need access to military rifles. None of this rocket science.

“Need,” especially when determined by third parties, does not define the scope of constitutional or human rights, or the qualities of a good and happy life.

[Anonymous]

Adding: and for the most part, “citizens” typically don’t have access to “military rifles, which at this point almost universally are capable of fully automatic fire.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Adding: and for the most part, “citizens” typically don’t have access to “military rifles, which at this point almost universally are capable of fully automatic fire.

If you aren't smart enough to understand the difference between a traditional shotgun or revolver and an assault rifle that can take out 30 people in 45 seconds, you should probably refrain from commenting. Idiot

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She said she would let her staff “clean it up” 9instead of owning her statement while she’s saying it).

Staff now saying she was just joking.

Guess you thought it was a serious issue. Not to her! She’ll just commit gun violence. Hahaha….

If it weren't for double standards, democrats would have no standards at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She said she would let her staff “clean it up” 9instead of owning her statement while she’s saying it).

Staff now saying she was just joking.

Guess you thought it was a serious issue. Not to her! She’ll just commit gun violence. Hahaha….

If it weren't for double standards, democrats would have no standards at all.

How and in what context is this a double standard situation? Harris has a pistol that serves the purpose of securing her homestead in the event of an unwelcome intruder. No one should have a problem with this. If you have a problem with that, perhaps it's you harboring the double standard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She said she would let her staff “clean it up” 9instead of owning her statement while she’s saying it).

Staff now saying she was just joking.

Guess you thought it was a serious issue. Not to her! She’ll just commit gun violence. Hahaha….

If it weren't for double standards, democrats would have no standards at all.

How and in what context is this a double standard situation? Harris has a pistol that serves the purpose of securing her homestead in the event of an unwelcome intruder. No one should have a problem with this. If you have a problem with that, perhaps it's you harboring the double standard.

Because she simultaneously calls for mandatory gun buybacks, i. e. confiscation, because gun violence is such a serious issue and at the same time she’s laughing about how she has a gun and she’ll just shoot someone ha ha ha, then says she’s just joking. Is gun violence serious, or not? That’s the double standard. Gun violence is serious when she wants to take guns away, but it’s a joke when she’s talking about using her own.

[Anonymous]

I put so much efforts in fighting against the gun in US. She is a huge disapoitmetn and despite my plans to vote for her, I am skipping this election all together. I believed her when she campaigned against the guns in 2019, and now she turned around to please some voters. She is stupid to realize that she lost more votes than she gained: gun fans are not going to believe her and people who are anti-guns are just going to turn their backs on her.