Usha Vance Dresses

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She was probably a top student with tiger parents who was focused on becoming valedictorian and national merit scholar, getting into an ivy, SAT, getting into law school, LSAT, law school, internships, bar exam, clerkships, job, marriage, children, husband's career, aging parents etc. No time for frivolous make up, plastic surgery and fashion magazines.

This is why I think the “aww shucks! I’m just a mom! My husband is the most interesting man I know and we like watching Babe together!” shtick is an act. She’s been groomed for this role from day 1.

Btw, “moms next door” who “aren’t ideologues” as her camp is leaking to the press don’t clerk for two conservative scotus justices. They just don’t.

Do you know actual lawyers in Washington? It doesn’t sound like it. Roberts and Kavanuagh have hired many normal people through the years.

Kavanaugh?? I don’t know

+1. Roberts and Kavanaugh came up as Bush/McCain/Romney era Conservatives especially around the era that Usha was clerking -- same types now being eviscerated from the Republican Party by MAGA.

Kavanaugh? I don’t know any K clerks that aren’t opportunistic political climbers. That’s why he had the Chua pipeline. I’ll give you Roberts — he has some normal clerks and even some normal people will take even an awful person for a SCt clerkship.

THIS. My family member was a supreme court clerk to one of the conservative justices and is appalled by the MAGA sector of the party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:None of you know how to post a picture?

Trolls.

THANK YOU!

For the love of God, the Img button is right there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She needs a little more makeup to not seem to washed out.

Well, the Trump women for sure can help with that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It doesn't look like she wears a lot of makeup. Is she just naturally fresh faced or is she wearing some very natural makeup? I see lip gloss and maybe some blush. That stage lighting would not look as forgiving on me!

This kind of exemplifies why this place is nuts. Until Monday, Usha could have been a frequent DCUM poster: DC lawyer mom with three small kids and a husband who seems pretty focused on his own career and seems to have evolved in a pretty negative way through the years. But suddenly this (mostly) normal person is getting all this criticism that she did not put enough makeup on to deal with the convention and TV lights? C'mon I have been clicking on some of your fashion links for years. Let me say I am skeptical that the vast majority of DCUM posters would have made better fashion choices in the same circumstances.

There is a difference between the scenarios you are describing. My coworker with three little kids and a shitty husband doesn’t wear makeup to work? Fine. No qualms from me, do whatever you want.

Woman - whose husband’s party has some pretty regressive views about women - goes on stage at a televised convention with no makeup and ratty hair? No one is calling her a troll just saying what was she thinking.

Her dress was fine. But yes I would’ve gotten a blow out and at least put on more than lip balm to sell America on why they should vote for my misogynist husband who complains about other women being “frumpy cat ladies.”

Her dress, hair, and makeup look fine. I remember many people ripping on Amy Coney Barett for not having a blowout. What is this, 1982 feminism? As long as she’s groomed and dressed appropriately, she’s fine. She doesn’t need 90 minutes in the makeup chair to be in the spotlight.

+1

Her dress was perfectly fine. Nothing to rip on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think she looks great. Even if I cannot fathom how a woman can support this ticket, much less be married to Vance.

But seriously - y'all are travelling in dresses like this?!

+1000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I want a boat neck, cape sleeve, forgiving fabric, longer midi travel dress like she wears. I found one but I don't do full price in this range. Is there something similar at more affordable price?


https://www.meandem.com/us/travel-tailoring-boat-neck-midi-dress-navy?glCountry=US&glCurrency=USD&gad_source=1&gbraid=0AAAAADtaHAJ5VfUcpM3gAUfKUXasbTCr7&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIscTf596whwMVATbUAR34Aw7xEAQYASABEgLCmvD_BwE#288=1805

OP have you never been in an old navy? How is this website selling a viscose dress for $425 and calling it “luxury quality, fair price?”

I can get a slinky viscose dress for $30 from TJ Maxx and it’ll look great. If I’m paying $$$ at least give me a nice material!!! So many “luxury” brands pull this crap.

Yes. That ME+EM dress looks bad on the skinny model and downright matronly on the normal size model. It's terrible. The one Usha Vance wore is a thumbs down in the color department, but the fit at least has something going for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It doesn't look like she wears a lot of makeup. Is she just naturally fresh faced or is she wearing some very natural makeup? I see lip gloss and maybe some blush. That stage lighting would not look as forgiving on me!

This kind of exemplifies why this place is nuts. Until Monday, Usha could have been a frequent DCUM poster: DC lawyer mom with three small kids and a husband who seems pretty focused on his own career and seems to have evolved in a pretty negative way through the years. But suddenly this (mostly) normal person is getting all this criticism that she did not put enough makeup on to deal with the convention and TV lights? C'mon I have been clicking on some of your fashion links for years. Let me say I am skeptical that the vast majority of DCUM posters would have made better fashion choices in the same circumstances.

There is a difference between the scenarios you are describing. My coworker with three little kids and a shitty husband doesn’t wear makeup to work? Fine. No qualms from me, do whatever you want.

Woman - whose husband’s party has some pretty regressive views about women - goes on stage at a televised convention with no makeup and ratty hair? No one is calling her a troll just saying what was she thinking.

Her dress was fine. But yes I would’ve gotten a blow out and at least put on more than lip balm to sell America on why they should vote for my misogynist husband who complains about other women being “frumpy cat ladies.”

Her dress, hair, and makeup look fine. I remember many people ripping on Amy Coney Barett for not having a blowout. What is this, 1982 feminism? As long as she’s groomed and dressed appropriately, she’s fine. She doesn’t need 90 minutes in the makeup chair to be in the spotlight.

SHE WASNT GROOMED OR DRESSED APPROPRIATELY. That is the argument people are making. A jersey lounge dress and unkempt hair is not appropriate!

Amy Coney Barrett looked lovely. She didn’t look like she overslept and threw on a dress.

I'm so confused. What pictures are you all looking at? I'm seeing a royal blue sheath dress with an off-the-shoulder sleeve that fits perfectly and looks great on her, I'm not seeing a "jersey lounge dress."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It doesn't look like she wears a lot of makeup. Is she just naturally fresh faced or is she wearing some very natural makeup? I see lip gloss and maybe some blush. That stage lighting would not look as forgiving on me!

This kind of exemplifies why this place is nuts. Until Monday, Usha could have been a frequent DCUM poster: DC lawyer mom with three small kids and a husband who seems pretty focused on his own career and seems to have evolved in a pretty negative way through the years. But suddenly this (mostly) normal person is getting all this criticism that she did not put enough makeup on to deal with the convention and TV lights? C'mon I have been clicking on some of your fashion links for years. Let me say I am skeptical that the vast majority of DCUM posters would have made better fashion choices in the same circumstances.

There is a difference between the scenarios you are describing. My coworker with three little kids and a shitty husband doesn’t wear makeup to work? Fine. No qualms from me, do whatever you want.

Woman - whose husband’s party has some pretty regressive views about women - goes on stage at a televised convention with no makeup and ratty hair? No one is calling her a troll just saying what was she thinking.



Her dress was fine. But yes I would’ve gotten a blow out and at least put on more than lip balm to sell America on why they should vote for my misogynist husband who complains about other women being “frumpy cat ladies.”

Her dress, hair, and makeup look fine. I remember many people ripping on Amy Coney Barett for not having a blowout. What is this, 1982 feminism? As long as she’s groomed and dressed appropriately, she’s fine. She doesn’t need 90 minutes in the makeup chair to be in the spotlight.

SHE WASNT GROOMED OR DRESSED APPROPRIATELY. That is the argument people are making. A jersey lounge dress and unkempt hair is not appropriate!

Amy Coney Barrett looked lovely. She didn’t look like she overslept and threw on a dress.

I'm so confused. What pictures are you all looking at? I'm seeing a royal blue sheath dress with an off-the-shoulder sleeve that fits perfectly and looks great on her, I'm not seeing a "jersey lounge dress."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It doesn't look like she wears a lot of makeup. Is she just naturally fresh faced or is she wearing some very natural makeup? I see lip gloss and maybe some blush. That stage lighting would not look as forgiving on me!

This kind of exemplifies why this place is nuts. Until Monday, Usha could have been a frequent DCUM poster: DC lawyer mom with three small kids and a husband who seems pretty focused on his own career and seems to have evolved in a pretty negative way through the years. But suddenly this (mostly) normal person is getting all this criticism that she did not put enough makeup on to deal with the convention and TV lights? C'mon I have been clicking on some of your fashion links for years. Let me say I am skeptical that the vast majority of DCUM posters would have made better fashion choices in the same circumstances.

There is a difference between the scenarios you are describing. My coworker with three little kids and a shitty husband doesn’t wear makeup to work? Fine. No qualms from me, do whatever you want.

Woman - whose husband’s party has some pretty regressive views about women - goes on stage at a televised convention with no makeup and ratty hair? No one is calling her a troll just saying what was she thinking.

Her dress was fine. But yes I would’ve gotten a blow out and at least put on more than lip balm to sell America on why they should vote for my misogynist husband who complains about other women being “frumpy cat ladies.”

Her dress, hair, and makeup look fine. I remember many people ripping on Amy Coney Barett for not having a blowout. What is this, 1982 feminism? As long as she’s groomed and dressed appropriately, she’s fine. She doesn’t need 90 minutes in the makeup chair to be in the spotlight.

SHE WASNT GROOMED OR DRESSED APPROPRIATELY. That is the argument people are making. A jersey lounge dress and unkempt hair is not appropriate!

Amy Coney Barrett looked lovely. She didn’t look like she overslept and threw on a dress.

I'm so confused. What pictures are you all looking at? I'm seeing a royal blue sheath dress with an off-the-shoulder sleeve that fits perfectly and looks great on her, I'm not seeing a "jersey lounge dress."

It's a sloppy, ill fitting dress with beat up espadrille flats. She looks like she's going to the farmer's market on a Saturday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It doesn't look like she wears a lot of makeup. Is she just naturally fresh faced or is she wearing some very natural makeup? I see lip gloss and maybe some blush. That stage lighting would not look as forgiving on me!

This kind of exemplifies why this place is nuts. Until Monday, Usha could have been a frequent DCUM poster: DC lawyer mom with three small kids and a husband who seems pretty focused on his own career and seems to have evolved in a pretty negative way through the years. But suddenly this (mostly) normal person is getting all this criticism that she did not put enough makeup on to deal with the convention and TV lights? C'mon I have been clicking on some of your fashion links for years. Let me say I am skeptical that the vast majority of DCUM posters would have made better fashion choices in the same circumstances.

There is a difference between the scenarios you are describing. My coworker with three little kids and a shitty husband doesn’t wear makeup to work? Fine. No qualms from me, do whatever you want.

Woman - whose husband’s party has some pretty regressive views about women - goes on stage at a televised convention with no makeup and ratty hair? No one is calling her a troll just saying what was she thinking.

Her dress was fine. But yes I would’ve gotten a blow out and at least put on more than lip balm to sell America on why they should vote for my misogynist husband who complains about other women being “frumpy cat ladies.”

Her dress, hair, and makeup look fine. I remember many people ripping on Amy Coney Barett for not having a blowout. What is this, 1982 feminism? As long as she’s groomed and dressed appropriately, she’s fine. She doesn’t need 90 minutes in the makeup chair to be in the spotlight.

SHE WASNT GROOMED OR DRESSED APPROPRIATELY. That is the argument people are making. A jersey lounge dress and unkempt hair is not appropriate!

Amy Coney Barrett looked lovely. She didn’t look like she overslept and threw on a dress.

ACB was up for a job HERSELF. This lady is the spouse of someone up for a job. She doesn’t owe anyone jacksh!t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was surprised that she wore blue and that her husband had a blue tie.

Yes! Same. I couldn’t stop drifting back to that during his entire [horrifying] speech.

His wife is beyond beautiful though. And I kind of hate that she seems so likable and relatable, like a parent I’d enjoy chatting with during a school function or while in line at a store.

She is a Yale law gunner. I doubt the small talk would be all that enjoyable for you unless you would enjoy her humblebragging about how smart her kids are while subtly putting yours down.

"Gunner." What the jealous bottom half of the law school class calls the top 20%.

LOL. Ok. You got me. I barely graduated top half and it was from a top 50 state school. I've moved into another field and am very happy with my level of success.

But I think you have proved my point very well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It doesn't look like she wears a lot of makeup. Is she just naturally fresh faced or is she wearing some very natural makeup? I see lip gloss and maybe some blush. That stage lighting would not look as forgiving on me!

This kind of exemplifies why this place is nuts. Until Monday, Usha could have been a frequent DCUM poster: DC lawyer mom with three small kids and a husband who seems pretty focused on his own career and seems to have evolved in a pretty negative way through the years. But suddenly this (mostly) normal person is getting all this criticism that she did not put enough makeup on to deal with the convention and TV lights? C'mon I have been clicking on some of your fashion links for years. Let me say I am skeptical that the vast majority of DCUM posters would have made better fashion choices in the same circumstances.

There is a difference between the scenarios you are describing. My coworker with three little kids and a shitty husband doesn’t wear makeup to work? Fine. No qualms from me, do whatever you want.

Woman - whose husband’s party has some pretty regressive views about women - goes on stage at a televised convention with no makeup and ratty hair? No one is calling her a troll just saying what was she thinking.



Her dress was fine. But yes I would’ve gotten a blow out and at least put on more than lip balm to sell America on why they should vote for my misogynist husband who complains about other women being “frumpy cat ladies.”

Her dress, hair, and makeup look fine. I remember many people ripping on Amy Coney Barett for not having a blowout. What is this, 1982 feminism? As long as she’s groomed and dressed appropriately, she’s fine. She doesn’t need 90 minutes in the makeup chair to be in the spotlight.

SHE WASNT GROOMED OR DRESSED APPROPRIATELY. That is the argument people are making. A jersey lounge dress and unkempt hair is not appropriate!

Amy Coney Barrett looked lovely. She didn’t look like she overslept and threw on a dress.

I'm so confused. What pictures are you all looking at? I'm seeing a royal blue sheath dress with an off-the-shoulder sleeve that fits perfectly and looks great on her, I'm not seeing a "jersey lounge dress."

I actually think the minimal makeup look is good for her. I sort of agree on the hair, but the style is fine. She just needed a stylist of some type here. She doesn't look bad, just a bit thrown together.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:None of you know how to post a picture?

Trolls.

THANK YOU!

For the love of God, the Img button is right there.

For the love of god, the PP could have embedded it.

[Anonymous]

I think she just does not really care about fashion or what any of you all say. She just grabbed a dress. Not a lot of thought. She’s not there for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It doesn't look like she wears a lot of makeup. Is she just naturally fresh faced or is she wearing some very natural makeup? I see lip gloss and maybe some blush. That stage lighting would not look as forgiving on me!

This kind of exemplifies why this place is nuts. Until Monday, Usha could have been a frequent DCUM poster: DC lawyer mom with three small kids and a husband who seems pretty focused on his own career and seems to have evolved in a pretty negative way through the years. But suddenly this (mostly) normal person is getting all this criticism that she did not put enough makeup on to deal with the convention and TV lights? C'mon I have been clicking on some of your fashion links for years. Let me say I am skeptical that the vast majority of DCUM posters would have made better fashion choices in the same circumstances.

There is a difference between the scenarios you are describing. My coworker with three little kids and a shitty husband doesn’t wear makeup to work? Fine. No qualms from me, do whatever you want.

Woman - whose husband’s party has some pretty regressive views about women - goes on stage at a televised convention with no makeup and ratty hair? No one is calling her a troll just saying what was she thinking.

Her dress was fine. But yes I would’ve gotten a blow out and at least put on more than lip balm to sell America on why they should vote for my misogynist husband who complains about other women being “frumpy cat ladies.”

Her dress, hair, and makeup look fine. I remember many people ripping on Amy Coney Barett for not having a blowout. What is this, 1982 feminism? As long as she’s groomed and dressed appropriately, she’s fine. She doesn’t need 90 minutes in the makeup chair to be in the spotlight.

SHE WASNT GROOMED OR DRESSED APPROPRIATELY. That is the argument people are making. A jersey lounge dress and unkempt hair is not appropriate!

Amy Coney Barrett looked lovely. She didn’t look like she overslept and threw on a dress.

I'm so confused. What pictures are you all looking at? I'm seeing a royal blue sheath dress with an off-the-shoulder sleeve that fits perfectly and looks great on her, I'm not seeing a "jersey lounge dress."

It's a sloppy, ill fitting dress with beat up espadrille flats. She looks like she's going to the farmer's market on a Saturday.

This looks fine. It isn't stunning, like the blue dress she wore onstage, but it didn't need to be. She's not a clothes horse.