DC Council rejects emergency legislation to restore the 300ft buffer between dispensaries and schools

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe we need a ballot initiative to re-criminalize it.

That would be racist.

Nah.

It would have a disproportionate impact on BIPOC. It's illegal to recriminalize it at this point.

I'll take "not a lawyer for $500, Alex."

TIL only lawyers can detect racism.

No, but only lawyers can use this as a legal argument in a court of law when challenging such a law.

Good luck challenging criminalization of drugs on constitutional grounds, friend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe we need a ballot initiative to re-criminalize it.

That would be racist.

Nah.

It would have a disproportionate impact on BIPOC. It's illegal to recriminalize it at this point.

I'll take "not a lawyer for $500, Alex."

TIL only lawyers can detect racism.

No, but only lawyers can use this as a legal argument in a court of law when challenging such a law.

By definition, only lawyers can argue anything in a court of law. Otherwise, it's practicing law without a license.