DP. I think Diana would’ve wanted William to marry an aristo. |
Like you being a hypocrite. Why are you using a device? Which harms the planet. Where are you living? On stolen property. |
You saying she should have leaned into a seat belt? |
Hard to say. This type of arrangement is what led to her lousy marriage. She may have realized that marrying outside of that and actually loving/respecting your spouse is more important. However, if she were still alive, I’m not sure the royal family would have modernized those rules. I think her death and the aftermath is what led to the relaxing of the rules which directly led to Kate and Meg |
She would have wanted them to be happy. |
So having a terrible childhood and seeing your mother cheated on makes you a cheater? |
I think this is probably true. Had Diana lived, everything would be different. In many ways her death paved the way for Charles to marry Camilla, because it would have been harder for the remarriage to get approval if the mother of the heir were still alive. On the other hand, I also think if Diana had lived, her public reputation would be more complicated (and less favorable) because it wouldn't be frozen in time. I think Harry and William would be less traumatized and screwed up, but they'd also have to manage divorced parents within their already weird and screwed up family, so I don't think it would just be smooth sailing. I do think Diana would still have a significant role in the family that would change a lot of dynamics, simply as mother to the heir. Think of Diana's involvement in William's and Harry's weddings, and the birth of their kids. With Diana dead, it was QEII's presence, approval, and involvement that was viewed as most significant. But Diana was as famous as QEII -- people would have been obsessed with her relationship with the DILs and with the boys' kids. It would just change everything. It's "cleaner" for the family, and better for Charles and Camilla specifically, that Diana is dead. Obviously worse for her sons and their families. Everything would be different if she was still alive. |
If this is true then why did she throw Harry out? |
I thought Camilla was a tampon? Or was that Charles? |
It was Charles who wanted to be one. |
She did. Camilla has been “the Queen” (not consort) for sometime now. |
Statistically, yes. Kids who grow up in homes where there is cheating are more likely to cheat. Add in that its generationally family tradition since forever, it would be a real anomally for William to not cheat. I'm sure he does, Kate knows the deal and DNGAF. |
No she didn't. QEII said Camilla would be queen consort in 2022 before she died (like 7 months before she died). There was a public announcement. At QEII's funeral events, Camilla was queen consort, as QEII wished. It was not until the coronation that Charles decided to drop the "consort" and the invitations to the coronation had her as just the queen. That was a decision Charles made AFTER QEII's death (which he can make and wasn't that surprising). QEII did not "give the go ahead" on Camilla being queen and made it pretty clear that she wanted/expected Camilla to be styled as queen consort when Charles ascended to the throne. But all she could do was make her wishes known -- Philip wasn't even around to impose familial pressure to follow QEII's wishes, and Charles did as he pleased. |
Link? |
Ha, you know NOTHING! |