MCPS Whistleblower Details Lies, Retaliation in Sexual Harassment Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was very good work done by Alexandra Robbins. Interestingly she did it with MoCo 360 and not the WaPo. I wonder why that's the case?

Either way, I believe every word Khalid Walker says and I knew they were scapegoating him. Good for him for fighting back. Brian Hull has got to go.

Oh my God, I just read the article. I am floored. I hope Walker sues. Just unbelievable that this was allowed to happen. Where was the voice of reason and the leadership to say, this has got to freaking stop. Was it really worth all this just to protect Beidleman?

I think they were trying way too hard to avoid having only 1 Black male HS principal, which is the current situation they find themselves in. They were willing to look the other way with Beidelman, and it came back to bite them.

[Anonymous]

Dr. McKnight is the victim of rapid promotion program without getting solid mentorship. The reason the test scores (particularly in math) are falling is precisely the reason why she was hired. (As a principal, she allegedly dramatically improved test scores - particularly for minorities)

Next investigation if I was still in the game - dig into her time as a principal. I’m guessing she has real issues here akin to Gay’s at Harvard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Saying a problem is nationwide does not absolve Dr. McKnight or MCPS from criticism for its response to these national problems.

No one is saying MCPS uniquely created the chronic absenteeism issue. But it is a fact that MCPS’s lax enforcement of its attendance policies and refusal to hold kids and families accountable has put gasoline on this fire.

Copy and paste this response to any number of issues MCPS gets flack for.

Here’s another one: Dr. McKnight isn’t responsible for kids bringing guns to schools. Fine. But what MEANINGFUL steps has she taken to minimize the odds a gun is brought into the school building from a security perspective since 2021 when the Magruder shooting happened? Nothing.

What exactly do you expect her to do in terms of MEANINGFUL steps? And I’m asking sincerely. She and her staff have worked to ramp up mental health by adding social workers. They’ve worked directly with HS students to create an App. They are adding cameras in other schools including ES. They added TJ coaches. They created a different SRO model. They’ve established a dedicated line with MCPD and hired a new Chief. Like the only thing I’ve heard people call for is STO’s and metal detectors. Reinstating SROs would go against student wishes and the county council both of which are groups that she and the system have to work with. And metal detectors are controversial and come with a host of logistics and expense (there are 21 HS and two more in plan for construction).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Saying a problem is nationwide does not absolve Dr. McKnight or MCPS from criticism for its response to these national problems.

No one is saying MCPS uniquely created the chronic absenteeism issue. But it is a fact that MCPS’s lax enforcement of its attendance policies and refusal to hold kids and families accountable has put gasoline on this fire.

Copy and paste this response to any number of issues MCPS gets flack for.

Here’s another one: Dr. McKnight isn’t responsible for kids bringing guns to schools. Fine. But what MEANINGFUL steps has she taken to minimize the odds a gun is brought into the school building from a security perspective since 2021 when the Magruder shooting happened? Nothing.

What exactly do you expect her to do in terms of MEANINGFUL steps? And I’m asking sincerely. She and her staff have worked to ramp up mental health by adding social workers. They’ve worked directly with HS students to create an App. They are adding cameras in other schools including ES. They added TJ coaches. They created a different SRO model. They’ve established a dedicated line with MCPD and hired a new Chief. Like the only thing I’ve heard people call for is STO’s and metal detectors. Reinstating SROs would go against student wishes and the county council both of which are groups that she and the system have to work with. And metal detectors are controversial and come with a host of logistics and expense (there are 21 HS and two more in plan for construction).

How about stop recycling known violent offenders around the high schools?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone can allege anything in a lawsuit. Take it with a grain of salt until proven.

Same old same old....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dr. McKnight is the victim of rapid promotion program without getting solid mentorship. The reason the test scores (particularly in math) are falling is precisely the reason why she was hired. (As a principal, she allegedly dramatically improved test scores - particularly for minorities)

Next investigation if I was still in the game - dig into her time as a principal. I’m guessing she has real issues here akin to Gay’s at Harvard.

LOLOL you really have no clue

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Saying a problem is nationwide does not absolve Dr. McKnight or MCPS from criticism for its response to these national problems.

No one is saying MCPS uniquely created the chronic absenteeism issue. But it is a fact that MCPS’s lax enforcement of its attendance policies and refusal to hold kids and families accountable has put gasoline on this fire.

Copy and paste this response to any number of issues MCPS gets flack for.

Here’s another one: Dr. McKnight isn’t responsible for kids bringing guns to schools. Fine. But what MEANINGFUL steps has she taken to minimize the odds a gun is brought into the school building from a security perspective since 2021 when the Magruder shooting happened? Nothing.

What exactly do you expect her to do in terms of MEANINGFUL steps? And I’m asking sincerely. She and her staff have worked to ramp up mental health by adding social workers. They’ve worked directly with HS students to create an App. They are adding cameras in other schools including ES. They added TJ coaches. They created a different SRO model. They’ve established a dedicated line with MCPD and hired a new Chief. Like the only thing I’ve heard people call for is STO’s and metal detectors. Reinstating SROs would go against student wishes and the county council both of which are groups that she and the system have to work with. And metal detectors are controversial and come with a host of logistics and expense (there are 21 HS and two more in plan for construction).

How about stop recycling known violent offenders around the high schools?

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He is no longer getting paid. Give it a rest. You witches got what you wanted. Ruining this man’s life and his children. Job well done.

How do you know this? Has he been terminated? What about Munsey? Are they all sharing a cubicle in HR?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Saying a problem is nationwide does not absolve Dr. McKnight or MCPS from criticism for its response to these national problems.

No one is saying MCPS uniquely created the chronic absenteeism issue. But it is a fact that MCPS’s lax enforcement of its attendance policies and refusal to hold kids and families accountable has put gasoline on this fire.

Copy and paste this response to any number of issues MCPS gets flack for.

Here’s another one: Dr. McKnight isn’t responsible for kids bringing guns to schools. Fine. But what MEANINGFUL steps has she taken to minimize the odds a gun is brought into the school building from a security perspective since 2021 when the Magruder shooting happened? Nothing.

What exactly do you expect her to do in terms of MEANINGFUL steps? And I’m asking sincerely. She and her staff have worked to ramp up mental health by adding social workers. They’ve worked directly with HS students to create an App. They are adding cameras in other schools including ES. They added TJ coaches. They created a different SRO model. They’ve established a dedicated line with MCPD and hired a new Chief. Like the only thing I’ve heard people call for is STO’s and metal detectors. Reinstating SROs would go against student wishes and the county council both of which are groups that she and the system have to work with. And metal detectors are controversial and come with a host of logistics and expense (there are 21 HS and two more in plan for construction).

1. Ask for more security personnel than we currently have in plan. They added a mere 11 security assistants in 2023. That’s it. 11 security assistant doesn’t even give one more per high school.

2. The reworked CEO model is an abysmal failure. Because of this new model, the BCC principal and head of security were attacked by students with no police backup because the CEO was attending to another call, since in the new model, they’re a shared resource and not dedicated at each high school. Furthermore, there is division over SROs but it is not true that all students are against them. Furthermore, the majority of principals were overwhelmingly in favor of retaining SROs. Their opinion, since they’re in charge of running schools, should not have been dismissed in favor of activists’s opinions who make a lot of noise and aren’t responsible for the consequences of a less secure school environment.

3. The asks for investment in security equipment should have been greater after Magruder. She did nothing and another gun was brought into campus at Walter Johnson, and more recently another student at Richard Montgomery was caught with a gun on campus. At some point, those who are against weapon detectors have to answer the question: do you hate weapon detectors more than you hate students bringing guns to school? Cause adding no kind of screening means you’re ok with more guns coming onto campus. Why is that ok?

[Anonymous]

Another Biedleman thread to rehash the same cherry picked facts. Can you people give this a rest already?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Saying a problem is nationwide does not absolve Dr. McKnight or MCPS from criticism for its response to these national problems.

No one is saying MCPS uniquely created the chronic absenteeism issue. But it is a fact that MCPS’s lax enforcement of its attendance policies and refusal to hold kids and families accountable has put gasoline on this fire.

Copy and paste this response to any number of issues MCPS gets flack for.

Here’s another one: Dr. McKnight isn’t responsible for kids bringing guns to schools. Fine. But what MEANINGFUL steps has she taken to minimize the odds a gun is brought into the school building from a security perspective since 2021 when the Magruder shooting happened? Nothing.

What exactly do you expect her to do in terms of MEANINGFUL steps? And I’m asking sincerely. She and her staff have worked to ramp up mental health by adding social workers. They’ve worked directly with HS students to create an App. They are adding cameras in other schools including ES. They added TJ coaches. They created a different SRO model. They’ve established a dedicated line with MCPD and hired a new Chief. Like the only thing I’ve heard people call for is STO’s and metal detectors. Reinstating SROs would go against student wishes and the county council both of which are groups that she and the system have to work with. And metal detectors are controversial and come with a host of logistics and expense (there are 21 HS and two more in plan for construction).

1. Ask for more security personnel than we currently have in plan. They added a mere 11 security assistants in 2023. That’s it. 11 security assistant doesn’t even give one more per high school.

2. The reworked CEO model is an abysmal failure. Because of this new model, the BCC principal and head of security were attacked by students with no police backup because the CEO was attending to another call, since in the new model, they’re a shared resource and not dedicated at each high school. Furthermore, there is division over SROs but it is not true that all students are against them. Furthermore, the majority of principals were overwhelmingly in favor of retaining SROs. Their opinion, since they’re in charge of running schools, should not have been dismissed in favor of activists’s opinions who make a lot of noise and aren’t responsible for the consequences of a less secure school environment.

3. The asks for investment in security equipment should have been greater after Magruder. She did nothing and another gun was brought into campus at Walter Johnson, and more recently another student at Richard Montgomery was caught with a gun on campus. At some point, those who are against weapon detectors have to answer the question: do you hate weapon detectors more than you hate students bringing guns to school? Cause adding no kind of screening means you’re ok with more guns coming onto campus. Why is that ok?

Or instead of making schools into kid prisons they might consider focusing on education like in the old days

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Another Biedleman thread to rehash the same cherry picked facts. Can you people give this a rest already?

You people, like the County Council?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Saying a problem is nationwide does not absolve Dr. McKnight or MCPS from criticism for its response to these national problems.

No one is saying MCPS uniquely created the chronic absenteeism issue. But it is a fact that MCPS’s lax enforcement of its attendance policies and refusal to hold kids and families accountable has put gasoline on this fire.

Copy and paste this response to any number of issues MCPS gets flack for.

Here’s another one: Dr. McKnight isn’t responsible for kids bringing guns to schools. Fine. But what MEANINGFUL steps has she taken to minimize the odds a gun is brought into the school building from a security perspective since 2021 when the Magruder shooting happened? Nothing.

What exactly do you expect her to do in terms of MEANINGFUL steps? And I’m asking sincerely. She and her staff have worked to ramp up mental health by adding social workers. They’ve worked directly with HS students to create an App. They are adding cameras in other schools including ES. They added TJ coaches. They created a different SRO model. They’ve established a dedicated line with MCPD and hired a new Chief. Like the only thing I’ve heard people call for is STO’s and metal detectors. Reinstating SROs would go against student wishes and the county council both of which are groups that she and the system have to work with. And metal detectors are controversial and come with a host of logistics and expense (there are 21 HS and two more in plan for construction).

1. Ask for more security personnel than we currently have in plan. They added a mere 11 security assistants in 2023. That’s it. 11 security assistant doesn’t even give one more per high school.

2. The reworked CEO model is an abysmal failure. Because of this new model, the BCC principal and head of security were attacked by students with no police backup because the CEO was attending to another call, since in the new model, they’re a shared resource and not dedicated at each high school. Furthermore, there is division over SROs but it is not true that all students are against them. Furthermore, the majority of principals were overwhelmingly in favor of retaining SROs. Their opinion, since they’re in charge of running schools, should not have been dismissed in favor of activists’s opinions who make a lot of noise and aren’t responsible for the consequences of a less secure school environment.

3. The asks for investment in security equipment should have been greater after Magruder. She did nothing and another gun was brought into campus at Walter Johnson, and more recently another student at Richard Montgomery was caught with a gun on campus. At some point, those who are against weapon detectors have to answer the question: do you hate weapon detectors more than you hate students bringing guns to school? Cause adding no kind of screening means you’re ok with more guns coming onto campus. Why is that ok?

1)Just because something is asked for does not mean it will be granted. A Superintendent and their staff still have to work with schools, students, the county council and MPD.

2) The principal and head of security were not attacked they intervened to break up a fight.

3)Those who are against metal/weapon detectors in schools are a large portion of the constituents in the county. And has already been pointed out in just the HS’ alone it would be a huge investment to outfit them with weapons detection. There are multiple entrances to schools, there is personnel needed all day. There is logistics to consider as kids move from indoors to portables. So yes while it can be done it won’t be without adding a huge amount of money to the budget or diverting it from elsewhere in the budget. Get to campaigning with the county council and your neighbors about a tax increase.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Saying a problem is nationwide does not absolve Dr. McKnight or MCPS from criticism for its response to these national problems.

No one is saying MCPS uniquely created the chronic absenteeism issue. But it is a fact that MCPS’s lax enforcement of its attendance policies and refusal to hold kids and families accountable has put gasoline on this fire.

Copy and paste this response to any number of issues MCPS gets flack for.

Here’s another one: Dr. McKnight isn’t responsible for kids bringing guns to schools. Fine. But what MEANINGFUL steps has she taken to minimize the odds a gun is brought into the school building from a security perspective since 2021 when the Magruder shooting happened? Nothing.

What exactly do you expect her to do in terms of MEANINGFUL steps? And I’m asking sincerely. She and her staff have worked to ramp up mental health by adding social workers. They’ve worked directly with HS students to create an App. They are adding cameras in other schools including ES. They added TJ coaches. They created a different SRO model. They’ve established a dedicated line with MCPD and hired a new Chief. Like the only thing I’ve heard people call for is STO’s and metal detectors. Reinstating SROs would go against student wishes and the county council both of which are groups that she and the system have to work with. And metal detectors are controversial and come with a host of logistics and expense (there are 21 HS and two more in plan for construction).

1. Ask for more security personnel than we currently have in plan. They added a mere 11 security assistants in 2023. That’s it. 11 security assistant doesn’t even give one more per high school.

2. The reworked CEO model is an abysmal failure. Because of this new model, the BCC principal and head of security were attacked by students with no police backup because the CEO was attending to another call, since in the new model, they’re a shared resource and not dedicated at each high school. Furthermore, there is division over SROs but it is not true that all students are against them. Furthermore, the majority of principals were overwhelmingly in favor of retaining SROs. Their opinion, since they’re in charge of running schools, should not have been dismissed in favor of activists’s opinions who make a lot of noise and aren’t responsible for the consequences of a less secure school environment.

3. The asks for investment in security equipment should have been greater after Magruder. She did nothing and another gun was brought into campus at Walter Johnson, and more recently another student at Richard Montgomery was caught with a gun on campus. At some point, those who are against weapon detectors have to answer the question: do you hate weapon detectors more than you hate students bringing guns to school? Cause adding no kind of screening means you’re ok with more guns coming onto campus. Why is that ok?

1)Just because something is asked for does not mean it will be granted. A Superintendent and their staff still have to work with schools, students, the county council and MPD.

2) The principal and head of security were not attacked they intervened to break up a fight.

3)Those who are against metal/weapon detectors in schools are a large portion of the constituents in the county. And has already been pointed out in just the HS’ alone it would be a huge investment to outfit them with weapons detection. There are multiple entrances to schools, there is personnel needed all day. There is logistics to consider as kids move from indoors to portables. So yes while it can be done it won’t be without adding a huge amount of money to the budget or diverting it from elsewhere in the budget. Get to campaigning with the county council and your neighbors about a tax increase.

1. But she didn't ask. So what's your point? And MCPS/McKnight ask for things they don't expect to get, but asking for things in the budget is a way to signal it's a priority, even if you don't think you'll get it. That was MCPS's whole strategy last year when they asked for the 10% tax hike knowing they wouldn't get it.

2. They absolutely got attacked and assaulted as they intervened in the student fight. They did not have police support due to the CEO being occupied with another call. You are conveniently ignoring the point that the revised CEO model is a failure.

3. Other school districts, such as PG county, Alexandria and other schools are implementing them. Do they have more money and security staff than MCPS? Also, point me to the data that proves the majority of students/parents in this county are against weapons detectors. That's not what I'm hearing from parents and staff on the ground today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Saying a problem is nationwide does not absolve Dr. McKnight or MCPS from criticism for its response to these national problems.

No one is saying MCPS uniquely created the chronic absenteeism issue. But it is a fact that MCPS’s lax enforcement of its attendance policies and refusal to hold kids and families accountable has put gasoline on this fire.

Copy and paste this response to any number of issues MCPS gets flack for.

Here’s another one: Dr. McKnight isn’t responsible for kids bringing guns to schools. Fine. But what MEANINGFUL steps has she taken to minimize the odds a gun is brought into the school building from a security perspective since 2021 when the Magruder shooting happened? Nothing.

What exactly do you expect her to do in terms of MEANINGFUL steps? And I’m asking sincerely. She and her staff have worked to ramp up mental health by adding social workers. They’ve worked directly with HS students to create an App. They are adding cameras in other schools including ES. They added TJ coaches. They created a different SRO model. They’ve established a dedicated line with MCPD and hired a new Chief. Like the only thing I’ve heard people call for is STO’s and metal detectors. Reinstating SROs would go against student wishes and the county council both of which are groups that she and the system have to work with. And metal detectors are controversial and come with a host of logistics and expense (there are 21 HS and two more in plan for construction).

1. Ask for more security personnel than we currently have in plan. They added a mere 11 security assistants in 2023. That’s it. 11 security assistant doesn’t even give one more per high school.

2. The reworked CEO model is an abysmal failure. Because of this new model, the BCC principal and head of security were attacked by students with no police backup because the CEO was attending to another call, since in the new model, they’re a shared resource and not dedicated at each high school. Furthermore, there is division over SROs but it is not true that all students are against them. Furthermore, the majority of principals were overwhelmingly in favor of retaining SROs. Their opinion, since they’re in charge of running schools, should not have been dismissed in favor of activists’s opinions who make a lot of noise and aren’t responsible for the consequences of a less secure school environment.

3. The asks for investment in security equipment should have been greater after Magruder. She did nothing and another gun was brought into campus at Walter Johnson, and more recently another student at Richard Montgomery was caught with a gun on campus. At some point, those who are against weapon detectors have to answer the question: do you hate weapon detectors more than you hate students bringing guns to school? Cause adding no kind of screening means you’re ok with more guns coming onto campus. Why is that ok?

Or instead of making schools into kid prisons they might consider focusing on education like in the old days

Your response is nonsense and doesn't address any of the points raised. Part of making education like in the old days is going back to a time when students didn't have to worry about their peers bringing guns and hardcore drugs into the school environment. What's your plan to get us back to that point?