Biden impeachment

[Anonymous]

I pity how utterly stupid you Republicans have gotten. I have had shoes that are smarter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SAR stands for Suspicious Activity Report and the reports are routinely used as evidence in Monday laundering cases. Sorry. Try again.

Any transaction over 10,000 dollars including moving money from my money market to my checking account, generates a SARS report. Are you suggesting I am guilty of something?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You guys are really out of it if you there there is no evidence that Joe Biden has acted in corrupt ways. Whether he would be found guilty in a court or not doesn’t mean there is “no evidence.” You can repeat that phrase over and over but it is clearly untrue that there is “no evidence” and you sound stupid. You sound really dumb or really dishonest. Those are the only options. Again, whether there is enough evidence to convict Joe is an true unknown but there is absolutely evidence that he has been up to some shady stuff since he was VP and that he blatantly lied about his entanglements with his son over and over.

Ok, Einstein, where is the evidence? Why didn't Barr prosecute 3 years ago?

Look, there is evidence. Everyone knows it and all of the smart commentators on non-fake news talk about it. Just because none of these press releases point to any evidence, doesn't mean that it doesn't exist.

What evidence?

SARs reports. First hand information from Biden business partners Bobalinski and Archer, Email, text messages, photographs, meeting attendance notes. There is a lot of evidence and if you have never heard about any of this, you need to change the channel. But all of this is evidence. You don’t get to say it isn’t just because you don’t think it proves guilt. Individual piece of Evidence doesn’t always prove guilt but it helps develop a scheme or corrupt practice.

The “first hand information” from Devon Archer said Joe wasn’t involved in any of the businesses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They want to pretend like Hunter and Joe are the same person, and that Hunter using his name to impress people somehow makes his father criminally responsible.

If Dad knew what Hunter was doing--and it now appears that Dad facilitated some of these meetings--then Dad is in on it.
Also, LOTS of other family members had been benefiting for years, it would seem.

But, if the bank accounts clear them, then let's see them.

Dad can know and it still isn't illegal. Really, where was this level of concern about families, business and white house between 2015 and 2021?

Guess what, familiy members can also benefit from a family's business and it isn't illegal.

So I ask again, where is the evidence?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SAR stands for Suspicious Activity Report and the reports are routinely used as evidence in Monday laundering cases. Sorry. Try again.

Any transaction over 10,000 dollars including moving money from my money market to my checking account, generates a SARS report. Are you suggesting I am guilty of something?

No. Moron. But the federal government decided decades ago to set that as the threshold for when a SAR must be generated by a bank. And they use them to look for suspicious activity. And to look for and prove money laundering. If you aren’t doing that, you’re good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SAR stands for Suspicious Activity Report and the reports are routinely used as evidence in Monday laundering cases. Sorry. Try again.

Do more research. They are for any large money transfers from foreign sources, so law firms & investment companies with foreign clients and partners have SAR transactions that are normal business actions.

Thanks babe. I am an attorney and work for a financial institution. They are required for all transactions over a certain dollar threshold. On their own, they don’t show much but when there are lots and lots of them showing money flowing back and forth among related entities with similar names and owners, it’s a big red flag for money laundering. And that is what they seem to show with Joe and family.

Not really. If Hunter sends money to his daughter for tuition, that forces a report. Not illegal.
If James sends money to Hunter for an investment, that forces a report, not illegal.

Really grasping at straws here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You guys are really out of it if you there there is no evidence that Joe Biden has acted in corrupt ways. Whether he would be found guilty in a court or not doesn’t mean there is “no evidence.” You can repeat that phrase over and over but it is clearly untrue that there is “no evidence” and you sound stupid. You sound really dumb or really dishonest. Those are the only options. Again, whether there is enough evidence to convict Joe is an true unknown but there is absolutely evidence that he has been up to some shady stuff since he was VP and that he blatantly lied about his entanglements with his son over and over.

Ok, Einstein, where is the evidence? Why didn't Barr prosecute 3 years ago?

Look, there is evidence. Everyone knows it and all of the smart commentators on non-fake news talk about it. Just because none of these press releases point to any evidence, doesn't mean that it doesn't exist.

What evidence?

SARs reports. First hand information from Biden business partners Bobalinski and Archer, Email, text messages, photographs, meeting attendance notes. There is a lot of evidence and if you have never heard about any of this, you need to change the channel. But all of this is evidence. You don’t get to say it isn’t just because you don’t think it proves guilt. Individual piece of Evidence doesn’t always prove guilt but it helps develop a scheme or corrupt practice.

The “first hand information” from Devon Archer said Joe wasn’t involved in any of the businesses.

That is not accurate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SAR stands for Suspicious Activity Report and the reports are routinely used as evidence in Monday laundering cases. Sorry. Try again.

Any transaction over 10,000 dollars including moving money from my money market to my checking account, generates a SARS report. Are you suggesting I am guilty of something?

No. Moron. But the federal government decided decades ago to set that as the threshold for when a SAR must be generated by a bank. And they use them to look for suspicious activity. And to look for and prove money laundering. If you aren’t doing that, you’re good.

And just because a report is generated, doesn't mean the transaction is actually suspicious. It is a report that prompts and investigation. If the investigation yields nothing, then so be it. So far, none of the reports have yielded anything nefarious or criminal. Moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You guys are really out of it if you there there is no evidence that Joe Biden has acted in corrupt ways. Whether he would be found guilty in a court or not doesn’t mean there is “no evidence.” You can repeat that phrase over and over but it is clearly untrue that there is “no evidence” and you sound stupid. You sound really dumb or really dishonest. Those are the only options. Again, whether there is enough evidence to convict Joe is an true unknown but there is absolutely evidence that he has been up to some shady stuff since he was VP and that he blatantly lied about his entanglements with his son over and over.

Ok, Einstein, where is the evidence? Why didn't Barr prosecute 3 years ago?

Look, there is evidence. Everyone knows it and all of the smart commentators on non-fake news talk about it. Just because none of these press releases point to any evidence, doesn't mean that it doesn't exist.

What evidence?

SARs reports. First hand information from Biden business partners Bobalinski and Archer, Email, text messages, photographs, meeting attendance notes. There is a lot of evidence and if you have never heard about any of this, you need to change the channel. But all of this is evidence. You don’t get to say it isn’t just because you don’t think it proves guilt. Individual piece of Evidence doesn’t always prove guilt but it helps develop a scheme or corrupt practice.

The “first hand information” from Devon Archer said Joe wasn’t involved in any of the businesses.

That is not accurate.

Yes it is. He specifically said he had no knowledge of any illegal activity on behalf of Joe Biden. Read the transcripts, it is there in black and white.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SAR stands for Suspicious Activity Report and the reports are routinely used as evidence in Monday laundering cases. Sorry. Try again.

Any transaction over 10,000 dollars including moving money from my money market to my checking account, generates a SARS report. Are you suggesting I am guilty of something?

No. Moron. But the federal government decided decades ago to set that as the threshold for when a SAR must be generated by a bank. And they use them to look for suspicious activity. And to look for and prove money laundering. If you aren’t doing that, you’re good.

And just because a report is generated, doesn't mean the transaction is actually suspicious. It is a report that prompts and investigation. If the investigation yields nothing, then so be it. So far, none of the reports have yielded anything nefarious or criminal. Moron.

You were correct up until your second to last sentence. The SARS reports are being investigated. That is exactly what is happening right now. Moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SAR stands for Suspicious Activity Report and the reports are routinely used as evidence in Monday laundering cases. Sorry. Try again.

Any transaction over 10,000 dollars including moving money from my money market to my checking account, generates a SARS report. Are you suggesting I am guilty of something?

No. Moron. But the federal government decided decades ago to set that as the threshold for when a SAR must be generated by a bank. And they use them to look for suspicious activity. And to look for and prove money laundering. If you aren’t doing that, you’re good.

And just because a report is generated, doesn't mean the transaction is actually suspicious. It is a report that prompts and investigation. If the investigation yields nothing, then so be it. So far, none of the reports have yielded anything nefarious or criminal. Moron.

You were correct up until your second to last sentence. The SARS reports are being investigated. That is exactly what is happening right now. Moron.

They have been investigated since they were generated and even more so over the last 5 years, but you think they might STILL turn something up. And you believe Comet Pizza has a basement, too, right?

[Anonymous]

The writing’s on the wall folks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SAR stands for Suspicious Activity Report and the reports are routinely used as evidence in Monday laundering cases. Sorry. Try again.

Any transaction over 10,000 dollars including moving money from my money market to my checking account, generates a SARS report. Are you suggesting I am guilty of something?

No. Moron. But the federal government decided decades ago to set that as the threshold for when a SAR must be generated by a bank. And they use them to look for suspicious activity. And to look for and prove money laundering. If you aren’t doing that, you’re good.

And just because a report is generated, doesn't mean the transaction is actually suspicious. It is a report that prompts and investigation. If the investigation yields nothing, then so be it. So far, none of the reports have yielded anything nefarious or criminal. Moron.

You were correct up until your second to last sentence. The SARS reports are being investigated. That is exactly what is happening right now. Moron.

They have been reviewed and investigated several times in the past 6 years. There’s nothing there. All you have is innuendo, which is enough for partisan fools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The writing’s on the wall folks.

House Republicans don’t have the votes. They are self-destructing.

[Anonymous]

The thing I don’t get is how Democrats seem to be willing to die on their sword for Biden. Trump is clearly a Svengali but he has some history of really generating sincere interest and excitement. Joe never has ever. He was elected as a replacement for Trump and a placeholder. And he is now clearly too old. So why the passionate defense. Isn’t his potentially shady dealings another reason to push him aside. NO ONE loves Biden. No one ever has except Jill. So why the blind loyalty to a man with clearly questionable abilities (age) and somewhat questionable ethics. Even if he didn’t break the law, he knew what his son was doing and he knew his son was getting rich off trading on the name. That Mah be cool for senators (which I think stinks) but it just isn’t ok for the VP.