Wait, unweighted? 40% of the class has straight A's? What are these teachers doing?! There has to be so much coddling and low standards for almost half the class at any school to not even have 1 B or A-. |
| geez... nope |
+1 Definitely don't get your kids hopes up! Especially if legacy or not URM or an athlete. And forget Northwestern. Don't waste the money on the application fee. Get a new pair of pants or go out to eat or something. |
Per this report, <12% have over 1500, so like 5% or less over 1550. Definitely not 20%, ridiculous statement. |
| Schools generally do not care between a 1520/1530 or 15/50/1580...they just want to see over 1500. |
+1 GPA and course rigor are much better indicators of overall success in college. |
NP. I live in California, where public high schools often publish school profiles. Approximately 20% of the classes at many public schools have this grade profile. |
When did your kids get in? This sounds like pre-2021, pre-Covid advice to me. |
| If Amherst was compelling, there are less ultra-selective but still competitive and highly regarded SLACs with name recognition she could think about as targets or at least not entirely "unrealistic"-- Connecticut College, Trinity, Smith, Macalester, Kenyon, William & Mary, Haverford, Skidmore, Dickinson, Denison, Bryn Mawr, Oberlin, Franklin & Marshall, Brandeis. Ithaca, Muhlenberg, Hobart & William Smith, Lafayette maybe closer to a safety. Bigger schools in a Northwestern vein to consider include Rochester, Syracuse, Wisconsin. I do really recommend thinking about historically women's colleges like Bryn Mawr and Smith (and maybe even Mount Holyoke)-- they're not as impossible to get into as they might be if they were co-ed, but the student bodies tend to be highly intellectual, engaged, and curious. Bryn Mawr has a close relationship with Swarthmore and Haverford, and Smith is in the five college consortium with Amherst, so they aren't actually isolated or worlds without men. A bummer that she's not interested in California-- it's easy to love Scripps. |
You are strangely hung up on this. The original point was 20 percent to 40 percent of kids will have similar grades. 76,000 kids will have 1500 plus on SAT. And in the test optional world, schools will still consider the kids with the grades but not the scores. That is exactly why the test optional world has made college admissions so much more competitive and unpredictable. |
NP. I agree with this. Son has similar stats to OP's kid, 4.0 uw, 1550, undecided. Might ED to Northwestern but unsure at this point about an ED2. It's a roll of the dice. Hard to love a school enough to make the ED commitment but not so much that the likely denial is tough to accept. |
Then it should be really easy to provide that data, so far just anecdotes |
Different PP. In our area, the high school School Profiles provide quartile data based on the weighted GPA. Some weight honors, others don't even offer honors, but offer lots of dual enrolllment options, where random electives via DE come with significant GPA bumps. It is much more difficult to guess what % of the class actually has straight As. Which makes me wonder, what does the admissions officer do with that information. Suppose you have an applicant with a 4.0 uw and, say, 6-9 APs, but their weighted GPA puts them just inside the top quartile. Would the addition of a high test score, mid-1500s like the examples above, move the needle, or no, not in the current test optional scenario? |
Different PP here. I don't think 20% of any given California high school has those grades, I would say it is more likely 5%. We have kids in HS and of the graduating class each year while there are kids going to Brown, Stanford, Yale, Berkeley, UCLA etc there are only about 30% of the total who go to an actual 4 year college, the rest are either going to CC, the military or the workforce. |
what is a LAC of WASP? |