DC certainly should take a lot of responsibility for the current state of the system through DC politicians systematically abusing their leadership positions on the Board for corrupt purposes. The current status of Metro was decades in the making and turning the transit system into a corruption machine has a lot to do with its current woes. |
No, but I believe a lot of people think the D.C. government gets way more in direct federal budget support than it does in reality. |
Usually 4 days a week |
Law firms will stop allowing telework as soon as Feds stop. Guaranteed. |
The Federal government is responsible for billions upon billions of dollars in direct and indirect economic support to the District of Columbia that is the envy of other jurisdictions, which is evident for how hard MD and VA are fighting over the new FBI HQ. How much is enough? |
I don’t think you know law firms very well. The only thing they care about are billable hours, winning new clients and lastly junior associate training (which is related to billable hours). |
Good. You can let the mayor know and I am sure that she will be proud. |
I do. They're looking for an excuse. They are traditional, i.e. do not care about benefits like tech companies. |
I dislike the mayor and she doesn't care what I think. I don't really care what she says because she's frequently just full of hot air. |
No you don’t, because if you did you would know that they don’t need excuses. They never even follow OPM on in-climate weather. If people need to come in, they need to come in. The first priority is profit per partner. If that is affected then they will change their tune. |
The D.C. government here is "demanding" that the feds not keep vacant offices downtown vacant. If the FBI was planning to be entirely remote forever, I doubt MD and VA would be squabbling over it. |
| Lol what? She needs to clean up the tent cities, crack down in crime, and eliminate the damn bike lanes everywhere first. It’s a traffic and crime ridden ****hole now. |
|
The most fair thing would be to force the federal government to pay municipal taxes on vacant or severely underutilized office buildings. An enormous amount of DC's commercial real estate foot print is owned by the feds and is tax free. It's very limiting. If those buildings are full of federal workers whose presence leads to lots of businesses popping up to serve them, it kind of evens out. If those buildings are entirely or mostly empty, it doesn't.
If the feds had to pay vacant property taxes on empty or mostly empty buildings, they would either force people back into offices or sell the buildings. From an economic standpoint, you don't even have to take a side here on anything -- not telework, or whether Bowser is entitled to ask for anything. The buildings are underutilized. Maximize their utility. You can do that by making them a source of tax revenue, selling them to organizations who will fill them with people, or sending federal workers back to the office. The one option that makes no economic sense is keeping the buildings as they are, tax free, but not using them. It's a waste of both city and federal resources. |
Is she referring to leased or owned properties? How does she expect the Federal government to do that in the near term? If the GSA was able to reach agreement with property owners to terminate leases without penalty, would the Federal government abandoning the buildings be good or bad for the DC economy? |
Maybe you'd be happier in Florida? As much as I dislike Bowser, at least she's not Desantis. |