I don't think they want to help anyone. I think they are just mean. |
Wow, not only is it a crazy expectation, but it’s not realistic even if parents tried to comply. For many illnesses, kids are the most contagious before symptoms appear and many symptoms linger once a child is no longer contagious. So just keeping kids home based on symptoms alone will not stop the spread of viruses in congregate settings. I feel awful for any family with a child with cancer, but I don’t think a group childcare setting is a safe option. |
Are you implying youngkin's kids go to a private school with mandatory masking? Which school is tbis? |
They're mad no one is responding to their multiple threads on AEM today. No one will argue with them there so they had to come here. |
Just scroll back a few - 15:48 I believe - "And to give them speech issues, challenges connecting/recognizing emotions, and failure to develop normal immunity." |
This right here is the problem with the current school policies as well. I would love to stop the spread of disease- my family has been down with the flu, would have preferred not to have that. Unfortunately, my kids were in school at their most contagious before they were symptomatic- keeping them home b/c of their post-viral coughs isn't helping anyone. |
Why don't you show me a peer reviewed study, not a news article that interviewed a few parents. |
That is not how the law works. |
Have you been in a school? Masks slip down constantly, alll day. They fall on the ground. Someone touches it. They're off for lunch. It's definitely not consistent. |
+1 Plus love how the antimaskers pick the straw man of cloth masks when literally no one on this post is advocating for their use. |
I would happily do this. The while class would be healthier and everyone learns how to be part of a caring community - everyone wins. |
You really suck, PP. That's horrible of you. |
This is completely false and made up - you clearly do not know why this lawsuit was filed. |
I guess you don't get sarcasm. Of course I don't actually think the deaf child should stay home. The parent of the deaf child said the immunocompromised child - who has a different disability than her child - should stay home. I'm pointing out that others could very easily say her deaf child should stay home due to their disability and need for accommodations. The point is that schools should put the accommodations in place for the deaf child and the immunocompromised child. Peer masking may be one of the accommodations an immunocompromised child may need to attend school. And no, that child should not have to stay home if they can attend school with this accommodation in place, that's a right they have under the ADA, and this settlement recognizes that. The amount of ignorance, ableism and just plain hate on here is upsetting. Pretty telling that no one wants to attach their names to this. |
uh yeah that's why some severely immunocompromised people needs their classmates to wear masks. |