Another mass shooting in Virginia

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are heinous.

Full stop.

They voted against funds or "mental health"

The Fox prop crowd this is on you and your MAGA morons.

So roughly 1/2 the population is "heinous"?
Grow up.

+1 why can’t people accept dead kids as the price of freedom? The kids and Sandyhook and Ulvadi gave their lives so that we can buy semi-automotive rifles

Logical fallacy much?

What, that’s the price of freedom. Are you not comfortable admitting it?

Hey and you can lose 20-30 pounds by cutting your head off ! No dieting!
Do you even know what a logical fallacy is?

Explain what the logical fallacy is.

Start with Strawman. You want to make the stupid repulsive argument that people who own guns approve of the murder of children. Which was done by a deranged person. Or that there is no other possible positive reason for gun ownership.

So it’s those positive reasons that make the dead kids worth it. Got it, thanks for clarifying!

You must be a troll ( or incredibly stupid).
Lets ban cars! Children die in automobile accidents right?
Here's a fun fact for you. Carry conceal holders are statistically speaking the most law abiding group in the country..
They also have had extensive criminal background checks done on them. Got it?

Here's a fun fact for you. The overwhelming majority of gun owners in the US are not concealed carry holders and have never been through any meaningful scrutiny before becoming gun owners. Got it?

And we can agree to have meaningful scrutiny of gun owners.
But as with the horrid evil Colorado shooter, many red flags were ignored by the police.
Same with VA Beach shooter.
Many of these folks should have had no access to guns using the existing laws which were ignored.
My point is you are trying to oversimplify a complex issue with your ridiculous and illogical emotional appeal argument.
It doesn't help the problem and appeals to only the simple-minded.

If existing laws, especially on a state level, are easily ignored or unenforceable, do you know what this typically means?

The legal regime does not work, and it is time for some new laws that apply for the entire country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are heinous.

Full stop.

They voted against funds or "mental health"

The Fox prop crowd this is on you and your MAGA morons.

So roughly 1/2 the population is "heinous"?
Grow up.

+1 why can’t people accept dead kids as the price of freedom? The kids and Sandyhook and Ulvadi gave their lives so that we can buy semi-automotive rifles

Logical fallacy much?

What, that’s the price of freedom. Are you not comfortable admitting it?

Hey and you can lose 20-30 pounds by cutting your head off ! No dieting!
Do you even know what a logical fallacy is?

Explain what the logical fallacy is.

Start with Strawman. You want to make the stupid repulsive argument that people who own guns approve of the murder of children. Which was done by a deranged person. Or that there is no other possible positive reason for gun ownership.

So it’s those positive reasons that make the dead kids worth it. Got it, thanks for clarifying!

You must be a troll ( or incredibly stupid).
Lets ban cars! Children die in automobile accidents right?
Here's a fun fact for you. Carry conceal holders are statistically speaking the most law abiding group in the country..
They also have had extensive criminal background checks done on them. Got it?

Yes, we have decided as a society that the benefits of driving in cars is worth the amount of maiming and killing they cause. The vast majority of our population seems to agree. It’s true; we are sacrificing lives for our convenience.

And some segment of our population believe that the benefits, whatever they believe they may be, of our current gun culture and laws are worth the amount of maiming and killing they cause. The problem is that over half of us don’t agree. We don’t see the benefits outweighing the death toll.

To you it’s worth it for children to die from gun violence so that you can own a gun. Can you just admit it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are heinous.

Full stop.

They voted against funds or "mental health"

The Fox prop crowd this is on you and your MAGA morons.

So roughly 1/2 the population is "heinous"?
Grow up.

+1 why can’t people accept dead kids as the price of freedom? The kids and Sandyhook and Ulvadi gave their lives so that we can buy semi-automotive rifles

Logical fallacy much?

What, that’s the price of freedom. Are you not comfortable admitting it?

Hey and you can lose 20-30 pounds by cutting your head off ! No dieting!
Do you even know what a logical fallacy is?

Explain what the logical fallacy is.

Start with Strawman. You want to make the stupid repulsive argument that people who own guns approve of the murder of children. Which was done by a deranged person. Or that there is no other possible positive reason for gun ownership.

So it’s those positive reasons that make the dead kids worth it. Got it, thanks for clarifying!

You must be a troll ( or incredibly stupid).
Lets ban cars! Children die in automobile accidents right?
Here's a fun fact for you. Carry conceal holders are statistically speaking the most law abiding group in the country..
They also have had extensive criminal background checks done on them. Got it?

Here's a fun fact for you. The overwhelming majority of gun owners in the US are not concealed carry holders and have never been through any meaningful scrutiny before becoming gun owners. Got it?

And we can agree to have meaningful scrutiny of gun owners.
But as with the horrid evil Colorado shooter, many red flags were ignored by the police.
Same with VA Beach shooter.
Many of these folks should have had no access to guns using the existing laws which were ignored.
My point is you are trying to oversimplify a complex issue with your ridiculous and illogical emotional appeal argument.
It doesn't help the problem and appeals to only the simple-minded.

If existing laws, especially on a state level, are easily ignored or unenforceable, do you know what this typically means?

The legal regime does not work, and it is time for some new laws that apply for the entire country.

If existing laws are ignored any new laws may be ignored as well.
If you think taking all guns away is your position, you are peeing in the wind and focusing your energy on a can't win position.
I personally think that any offense involving a gun should have a mandatory punishment about double what currently exists even if we have to build more prisons.
Right now, some convicted offenders are walking free with probation (or are not prosecuted) which is insane and feeds to the fear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are heinous.

Full stop.

They voted against funds or "mental health"

The Fox prop crowd this is on you and your MAGA morons.

So roughly 1/2 the population is "heinous"?
Grow up.

+1 why can’t people accept dead kids as the price of freedom? The kids and Sandyhook and Ulvadi gave their lives so that we can buy semi-automotive rifles

Logical fallacy much?

What, that’s the price of freedom. Are you not comfortable admitting it?

Hey and you can lose 20-30 pounds by cutting your head off ! No dieting!
Do you even know what a logical fallacy is?

Explain what the logical fallacy is.

Start with Strawman. You want to make the stupid repulsive argument that people who own guns approve of the murder of children. Which was done by a deranged person. Or that there is no other possible positive reason for gun ownership.

So it’s those positive reasons that make the dead kids worth it. Got it, thanks for clarifying!

You must be a troll ( or incredibly stupid).
Lets ban cars! Children die in automobile accidents right?
Here's a fun fact for you. Carry conceal holders are statistically speaking the most law abiding group in the country..
They also have had extensive criminal background checks done on them. Got it?

This is true.

People who have jumped through all the legal hurdles to obtain a concealed carry permit are the most law abiding in our society.

[Anonymous]

No other advanced country in this world has random mass shootings like we do.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are heinous.

Full stop.

They voted against funds or "mental health"

The Fox prop crowd this is on you and your MAGA morons.

So roughly 1/2 the population is "heinous"?
Grow up.

+1 why can’t people accept dead kids as the price of freedom? The kids and Sandyhook and Ulvadi gave their lives so that we can buy semi-automotive rifles

Logical fallacy much?

What, that’s the price of freedom. Are you not comfortable admitting it?

Hey and you can lose 20-30 pounds by cutting your head off ! No dieting!
Do you even know what a logical fallacy is?

Explain what the logical fallacy is.

Start with Strawman. You want to make the stupid repulsive argument that people who own guns approve of the murder of children. Which was done by a deranged person. Or that there is no other possible positive reason for gun ownership.

So it’s those positive reasons that make the dead kids worth it. Got it, thanks for clarifying!

You must be a troll ( or incredibly stupid).
Lets ban cars! Children die in automobile accidents right?
Here's a fun fact for you. Carry conceal holders are statistically speaking the most law abiding group in the country..
They also have had extensive criminal background checks done on them. Got it?

Yes, we have decided as a society that the benefits of driving in cars is worth the amount of maiming and killing they cause. The vast majority of our population seems to agree. It’s true; we are sacrificing lives for our convenience.

And some segment of our population believe that the benefits, whatever they believe they may be, of our current gun culture and laws are worth the amount of maiming and killing they cause. The problem is that over half of us don’t agree. We don’t see the benefits outweighing the death toll.

To you it’s worth it for children to die from gun violence so that you can own a gun. Can you just admit it?

No, they will never admit it.

[Anonymous]

This made me so happy!! They should also sue NRA.

Anonymous wrote:

[Anonymous]

Can they also sue Virginia and GOP. This made me so happy!! They should also sue NRA.

Anonymous wrote:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Everyone please read the article which outlines the plaintiff's complaints. The employee had been complaining about the shooter several times prior to the event. He had been harassing her. Walmart is disgusting for continuing to employ him. I hope she wins every single cent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are heinous.

Full stop.

They voted against funds or "mental health"

The Fox prop crowd this is on you and your MAGA morons.

So roughly 1/2 the population is "heinous"?
Grow up.

+1 why can’t people accept dead kids as the price of freedom? The kids and Sandyhook and Ulvadi gave their lives so that we can buy semi-automotive rifles

Logical fallacy much?

What, that’s the price of freedom. Are you not comfortable admitting it?

Hey and you can lose 20-30 pounds by cutting your head off ! No dieting!
Do you even know what a logical fallacy is?

Explain what the logical fallacy is.

Start with Strawman. You want to make the stupid repulsive argument that people who own guns approve of the murder of children. Which was done by a deranged person. Or that there is no other possible positive reason for gun ownership.

So it’s those positive reasons that make the dead kids worth it. Got it, thanks for clarifying!

You must be a troll ( or incredibly stupid).
Lets ban cars! Children die in automobile accidents right?
Here's a fun fact for you. Carry conceal holders are statistically speaking the most law abiding group in the country..
They also have had extensive criminal background checks done on them. Got it?

Yes, we have decided as a society that the benefits of driving in cars is worth the amount of maiming and killing they cause. The vast majority of our population seems to agree. It’s true; we are sacrificing lives for our convenience.

And some segment of our population believe that the benefits, whatever they believe they may be, of our current gun culture and laws are worth the amount of maiming and killing they cause. The problem is that over half of us don’t agree. We don’t see the benefits outweighing the death toll.

To you it’s worth it for children to die from gun violence so that you can own a gun. Can you just admit it?

Care actually provide a benefit to society. They are not made simply to kill others like guns. Stop comparing cars to guns. I completely agree with the PP who said all guns should be banned. Pathetic society we live in that so many people don’t understand this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can they also sue Virginia and GOP. This made me so happy!! They should also sue NRA.

Anonymous wrote:

The victims’ families should also sue.