If they were data driven, they would certainly want to model the impact. If they were operating in a purely ideological manner, then they would not. I would not be surprised if this precipitated a reconsideration of the Connecticut Avenue plan. I would also not be surprised if they irresponsibly went ahead with it anyway. |
I live near the park and have kids and support this closure AND the CT Ave plan. |
You are the traffic. |
| There's more than a half million cars in the city. Seems like it would be smart to put them on big roads that are designed to handle lots of traffic, and where people expect there to be lots of traffic, instead of forcing them into all the little side streets. |
+1 Those with kids and those that frequent both sides of the park want it open. Those without kids and those that don't frequent the "other" side don't want it reopened. |
Inaccurate. Source: father of three in CCDC who is very happy with the NPS decision. And by "other" side do you mean the north side or the south side because those are the two "sides" connected by Beach Drive. Or were you trying to make this an EOTP vs WOTP thing? |
Those who have kids under the age of.16. Feel better now? |
Still not accurate. |
I have kids under 16 and we're all excited about it |
| As traffic inevitably worsens with more and more people back on the roads, I’m confident the NPS will reopen Upper Beach Drive within 12 months. |
No, you’re driving past my house! |
They never reopened Klingle Rd. These things have a way of becoming permanent. |
Nope, very happy it is closed, but thanks for asking. |
|
What is the data on how many people used upper beach drive while driving vs those who only use it to bike and walk? It seems the needs of the few are over the needs of the many.
Om a side note where can I park so I can walk my dog there? I live too far away to walk. ( without getting a ticket) so like 2 hour parking TY! |
Bike lanes are not a big EOTP. That's a rich white people thing. |