| 19 |
| 30 |
| 16 and the average American is poor, so it’s not surprising that they haven’t travelled much. |
| 7. I'm an immigrant, if that makes a difference. |
| 7, but I'm not an American and don't care to travel here. |
|
22
|
| 19 |
| 4 - Native Washingtonian here who has never been inside the White House for a tour. Does the outside count? If so, 5. |
| 29 |
| 21 |
Agree with this. One thing that is glaring to me is the absence of significant Native sites, for instance. Or a lot of historical sites (other than Sumter) that many people visit, whether you're thinking Gettysburg or the Stonewall Inn. I also get a strong sense, having lived or spent a lot of time in many of the cities with places on this list, that these are what are considered the "must see" tourist destinations for these cities. How terrible! I mean sure, if you are in Vegas, go to the strip. But imagine going to San Francisco and prioritizing Alcatraz? The NYC list is better (Central Park really is a must to me) but still overlooks a lot of stuff that is way more interesting and worthwhile than the Empire State Building (hello, go to a museum). This list reminds me of a guy I worked with once who would intentionally pick flights with weird layovers if it would enable him to say he'd been to another country. I'm not talking about a 24 hour layover so he could go get dinner and walk around Copenhagen. I mean a 3 hour layover on a flight back from Turkey that was also connecting through Paris, just so he could say he'd been to two additional countries. I was so confused. Who care if you can say you've been a place if you didn't actually get to experience anything there? It seems like the emptiest of bragging rights. |
| 25 |
| 28 |
| 32. I missed Pikes Peak and Niagara Falls. |
| 16 but I’m a city person who has no interest in national parks or outdoorsy stuff. |