Common Sense Gun Laws

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:- license and pass a safety test (just like we have for cars)
- license can be taken away for violations, safety hazards (just like for cars)
- insurance required (just like we have for cars)
- police need to have more powerful weapons that citizenry are allowed (just like for cars, police can access equipment citizenry can’t)

Americans love cars just like they love guns. But we seem not to have totally lost their mind over them.

I absolutely disagree with your stance on police. They and the rest of us non military need nothing more than a handgun and in reality I'd prefer not even that.

Those in the military can have other styles of guns when on duty only. Not to be kept at home. Same for those that hunt.they can go to designated areas and sign in and out

This is not constitutional. But even if it was now you do not have the support needed to do anything.

Excellent image. We don't have to accept this extremely perverted nonsense the gun nuts try to sell about the 2nd amendment.

This is our country to set the rules that we want. The usa does not belong to daniel defense and it's Ilk so they can shove off.

Play on words like this is asinine and convinces no one. By this same rationale, we can't maintain a police department for the purpose of public peace keeping if individual police officers may be corrupt.

To the contrary, that an assault weapons ban is perfectly legal and desireable is a fact.

What's wrong? You will miss strutting around and shooting your big big big powerful assualt weapon? Awwww. It will be ok.

You have the burden of proof on that.

I don't know where you live that have people strutting around and just shooting their guns off, but I recommend that you move asap.

We had an assualt weapon ban and a high capacity magazines ban and it was fine. It was not struck down....pathetically it expired. It will be even more pathetic if we do not reinstate it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:- license and pass a safety test (just like we have for cars)
- license can be taken away for violations, safety hazards (just like for cars)
- insurance required (just like we have for cars)
- police need to have more powerful weapons that citizenry are allowed (just like for cars, police can access equipment citizenry can’t)

Americans love cars just like they love guns. But we seem not to have totally lost their mind over them.

I absolutely disagree with your stance on police. They and the rest of us non military need nothing more than a handgun and in reality I'd prefer not even that.

Those in the military can have other styles of guns when on duty only. Not to be kept at home. Same for those that hunt.they can go to designated areas and sign in and out

This is not constitutional. But even if it was now you do not have the support needed to do anything.

Excellent image. We don't have to accept this extremely perverted nonsense the gun nuts try to sell about the 2nd amendment.

This is our country to set the rules that we want. The usa does not belong to daniel defense and it's Ilk so they can shove off.

Play on words like this is asinine and convinces no one. By this same rationale, we can't maintain a police department for the purpose of public peace keeping if individual police officers may be corrupt.

To the contrary, that an assault weapons ban is perfectly legal and desireable is a fact.

What's wrong? You will miss strutting around and shooting your big big big powerful assualt weapon? Awwww. It will be ok.

You have the burden of proof on that.

I don't know where you live that have people strutting around and just shooting their guns off, but I recommend that you move asap.

We had an assualt weapon ban and a high capacity magazines ban and it was fine. It was not struck down....pathetically it expired. It will be even more pathetic if we do not reinstate it.

Recent bans have been ruled unconstitutional. It's highly likely that the original ban was also unconstitutional given recent court outcome. So again, you have the burden of proof.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Folks: "Gun Control" is a dead term. It died at Sandy Hook. The new term is Massacre Reduction. Pass it on.

Yea, seems like a good way to refocus our efforts on the root cause of mental health crisis.

Great idea!!!

? "Mental health crisis" is a Republican talking point. See also: "Criminals."

The crisis is widespread retail access to assault weapons.

To that point, there's some sweet deals here if you're in the market:

https://www.sportsmansoutdoorsuperstore.com/category.cfm/sportsman/ar-15-rifles

But, yes, the new term (replacing soggy old, failed "gun control") is Massacre Reduction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:- license and pass a safety test (just like we have for cars)
- license can be taken away for violations, safety hazards (just like for cars)
- insurance required (just like we have for cars)
- police need to have more powerful weapons that citizenry are allowed (just like for cars, police can access equipment citizenry can’t)

Americans love cars just like they love guns. But we seem not to have totally lost their mind over them.

I absolutely disagree with your stance on police. They and the rest of us non military need nothing more than a handgun and in reality I'd prefer not even that.

Those in the military can have other styles of guns when on duty only. Not to be kept at home. Same for those that hunt.they can go to designated areas and sign in and out

This is not constitutional. But even if it was now you do not have the support needed to do anything.

Excellent image. We don't have to accept this extremely perverted nonsense the gun nuts try to sell about the 2nd amendment.

This is our country to set the rules that we want. The usa does not belong to daniel defense and it's Ilk so they can shove off.

Play on words like this is asinine and convinces no one. By this same rationale, we can't maintain a police department for the purpose of public peace keeping if individual police officers may be corrupt.

To the contrary, that an assault weapons ban is perfectly legal and desireable is a fact.

What's wrong? You will miss strutting around and shooting your big big big powerful assualt weapon? Awwww. It will be ok.

You have the burden of proof on that.

I don't know where you live that have people strutting around and just shooting their guns off, but I recommend that you move asap.

We had an assualt weapon ban and a high capacity magazines ban and it was fine. It was not struck down....pathetically it expired. It will be even more pathetic if we do not reinstate it.

Recent bans have been ruled unconstitutional. It's highly likely that the original ban was also unconstitutional given recent court outcome. So again, you have the burden of proof.

Scotus can be better insulated from the nra or daniel defense or whoever you are. The constitution is ours and so are the amendments.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Folks: "Gun Control" is a dead term. It died at Sandy Hook. The new term is Massacre Reduction. Pass it on.

Yea, seems like a good way to refocus our efforts on the root cause of mental health crisis.

Great idea!!!

In your mind, does only the US have mental health issues?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:- license and pass a safety test (just like we have for cars)
- license can be taken away for violations, safety hazards (just like for cars)
- insurance required (just like we have for cars)
- police need to have more powerful weapons that citizenry are allowed (just like for cars, police can access equipment citizenry can’t)

Americans love cars just like they love guns. But we seem not to have totally lost their mind over them.

I absolutely disagree with your stance on police. They and the rest of us non military need nothing more than a handgun and in reality I'd prefer not even that.

Those in the military can have other styles of guns when on duty only. Not to be kept at home. Same for those that hunt.they can go to designated areas and sign in and out

This is not constitutional. But even if it was now you do not have the support needed to do anything.

Excellent image. We don't have to accept this extremely perverted nonsense the gun nuts try to sell about the 2nd amendment.

This is our country to set the rules that we want. The usa does not belong to daniel defense and it's Ilk so they can shove off.

Play on words like this is asinine and convinces no one. By this same rationale, we can't maintain a police department for the purpose of public peace keeping if individual police officers may be corrupt.

To the contrary, that an assault weapons ban is perfectly legal and desireable is a fact.

What's wrong? You will miss strutting around and shooting your big big big powerful assualt weapon? Awwww. It will be ok.

You have the burden of proof on that.

I don't know where you live that have people strutting around and just shooting their guns off, but I recommend that you move asap.

We had an assualt weapon ban and a high capacity magazines ban and it was fine. It was not struck down....pathetically it expired. It will be even more pathetic if we do not reinstate it.

Recent bans have been ruled unconstitutional pending appeal. It's likely scotus will rule on this again. It's highly likely that the original ban was also unconstitutional given recent court outcome. So again, you have the burden of proof.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Folks: "Gun Control" is a dead term. It died at Sandy Hook. The new term is Massacre Reduction. Pass it on.

Yea, seems like a good way to refocus our efforts on the root cause of mental health crisis.

Great idea!!!

In your mind, does only the US have mental health issues?

Well, tt's that terrible trifecta of "mental health issues" and "criminals" and "propped-open doors."

It is not the ease of purchase of assault weapons.

p.s. Sensational Springtime Sale on AR-15s here (below). Don't miss out!

https://www.sportsmansoutdoorsuperstore.com/category.cfm/sportsman/ar-15-rifles

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:- license and pass a safety test (just like we have for cars)
- license can be taken away for violations, safety hazards (just like for cars)
- insurance required (just like we have for cars)
- police need to have more powerful weapons that citizenry are allowed (just like for cars, police can access equipment citizenry can’t)

Americans love cars just like they love guns. But we seem not to have totally lost their mind over them.

I absolutely disagree with your stance on police. They and the rest of us non military need nothing more than a handgun and in reality I'd prefer not even that.

Those in the military can have other styles of guns when on duty only. Not to be kept at home. Same for those that hunt.they can go to designated areas and sign in and out

This is not constitutional. But even if it was now you do not have the support needed to do anything.

Excellent image. We don't have to accept this extremely perverted nonsense the gun nuts try to sell about the 2nd amendment.

This is our country to set the rules that we want. The usa does not belong to daniel defense and it's Ilk so they can shove off.

Play on words like this is asinine and convinces no one. By this same rationale, we can't maintain a police department for the purpose of public peace keeping if individual police officers may be corrupt.

To the contrary, that an assault weapons ban is perfectly legal and desireable is a fact.

What's wrong? You will miss strutting around and shooting your big big big powerful assualt weapon? Awwww. It will be ok.

You have the burden of proof on that.

I don't know where you live that have people strutting around and just shooting their guns off, but I recommend that you move asap.

We had an assualt weapon ban and a high capacity magazines ban and it was fine. It was not struck down....pathetically it expired. It will be even more pathetic if we do not reinstate it.

Recent bans have been ruled unconstitutional pending appeal. It's likely scotus will rule on this again. It's highly likely that the original ban was also unconstitutional given recent court outcome. So again, you have the burden of proof.

So again, you have the burden of proof.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:- license and pass a safety test (just like we have for cars)
- license can be taken away for violations, safety hazards (just like for cars)
- insurance required (just like we have for cars)
- police need to have more powerful weapons that citizenry are allowed (just like for cars, police can access equipment citizenry can’t)

Americans love cars just like they love guns. But we seem not to have totally lost their mind over them.

I absolutely disagree with your stance on police. They and the rest of us non military need nothing more than a handgun and in reality I'd prefer not even that.

Those in the military can have other styles of guns when on duty only. Not to be kept at home. Same for those that hunt.they can go to designated areas and sign in and out

This is not constitutional. But even if it was now you do not have the support needed to do anything.

Excellent image. We don't have to accept this extremely perverted nonsense the gun nuts try to sell about the 2nd amendment.

This is our country to set the rules that we want. The usa does not belong to daniel defense and it's Ilk so they can shove off.

Play on words like this is asinine and convinces no one. By this same rationale, we can't maintain a police department for the purpose of public peace keeping if individual police officers may be corrupt.

To the contrary, that an assault weapons ban is perfectly legal and desireable is a fact.

What's wrong? You will miss strutting around and shooting your big big big powerful assualt weapon? Awwww. It will be ok.

You have the burden of proof on that.

I don't know where you live that have people strutting around and just shooting their guns off, but I recommend that you move asap.

We had an assualt weapon ban and a high capacity magazines ban and it was fine. It was not struck down....pathetically it expired. It will be even more pathetic if we do not reinstate it.

Recent bans have been ruled unconstitutional. It's highly likely that the original ban was also unconstitutional given recent court outcome. So again, you have the burden of proof.

2A definitely says "well regulated militia"

If SCOTUS isn't specifically addressing that then SCOTUS would be behaving unconstitutionally and shouldn't be allowed to overturn regulation.

[Anonymous]

So again, you have the burden of proof.

Proof?

Dear mass-shooting fan: I can think of 21 (freshly dead) Exhibit A's.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Folks: "Gun Control" is a dead term. It died at Sandy Hook. The new term is Massacre Reduction. Pass it on.

Yea, seems like a good way to refocus our efforts on the root cause of mental health crisis.

Great idea!!!

In your mind, does only the US have mental health issues?

You can't be this stupid, but yet you are. The US has one of the highest rates of depression in the world, especially depression experienced by men. We also have one of the worst mental health care systems in terms of rates of intervention. The quality of care is the best in the world, but it's just not well utilized.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

So again, you have the burden of proof.

Proof?

Dear mass-shooting fan: I can think of 21 (freshly dead) Exhibit A's.

Horrific crimes may be proof of need for weapons ban, but not such a ban is constitutional.

Try again . Use your brain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:- license and pass a safety test (just like we have for cars)
- license can be taken away for violations, safety hazards (just like for cars)
- insurance required (just like we have for cars)
- police need to have more powerful weapons that citizenry are allowed (just like for cars, police can access equipment citizenry can’t)

Americans love cars just like they love guns. But we seem not to have totally lost their mind over them.

I absolutely disagree with your stance on police. They and the rest of us non military need nothing more than a handgun and in reality I'd prefer not even that.

Those in the military can have other styles of guns when on duty only. Not to be kept at home. Same for those that hunt.they can go to designated areas and sign in and out

This is not constitutional. But even if it was now you do not have the support needed to do anything.

Excellent image. We don't have to accept this extremely perverted nonsense the gun nuts try to sell about the 2nd amendment.

This is our country to set the rules that we want. The usa does not belong to daniel defense and it's Ilk so they can shove off.

Play on words like this is asinine and convinces no one. By this same rationale, we can't maintain a police department for the purpose of public peace keeping if individual police officers may be corrupt.

To the contrary, that an assault weapons ban is perfectly legal and desireable is a fact.

What's wrong? You will miss strutting around and shooting your big big big powerful assualt weapon? Awwww. It will be ok.

You have the burden of proof on that.

I don't know where you live that have people strutting around and just shooting their guns off, but I recommend that you move asap.

We had an assualt weapon ban and a high capacity magazines ban and it was fine. It was not struck down....pathetically it expired. It will be even more pathetic if we do not reinstate it.

Recent bans have been ruled unconstitutional. It's highly likely that the original ban was also unconstitutional given recent court outcome. So again, you have the burden of proof.

2A definitely says "well regulated militia"

If SCOTUS isn't specifically addressing that then SCOTUS would be behaving unconstitutionally and shouldn't be allowed to overturn regulation.

That clause does not allow a ban on so-called assault weapons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So again, you have the burden of proof.

Proof?

Dear mass-shooting fan: I can think of 21 (freshly dead) Exhibit A's.

Horrific crimes may be proof of need for weapons ban, but not such a ban is constitutional.

Try again . Use your brain.

Another proud voice from the Pro-Massacre Community. Pedants welcomed!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:- license and pass a safety test (just like we have for cars)
- license can be taken away for violations, safety hazards (just like for cars)
- insurance required (just like we have for cars)
- police need to have more powerful weapons that citizenry are allowed (just like for cars, police can access equipment citizenry can’t)

Americans love cars just like they love guns. But we seem not to have totally lost their mind over them.

I absolutely disagree with your stance on police. They and the rest of us non military need nothing more than a handgun and in reality I'd prefer not even that.

Those in the military can have other styles of guns when on duty only. Not to be kept at home. Same for those that hunt.they can go to designated areas and sign in and out

This is not constitutional. But even if it was now you do not have the support needed to do anything.

Excellent image. We don't have to accept this extremely perverted nonsense the gun nuts try to sell about the 2nd amendment.

This is our country to set the rules that we want. The usa does not belong to daniel defense and it's Ilk so they can shove off.

Play on words like this is asinine and convinces no one. By this same rationale, we can't maintain a police department for the purpose of public peace keeping if individual police officers may be corrupt.

To the contrary, that an assault weapons ban is perfectly legal and desireable is a fact.

What's wrong? You will miss strutting around and shooting your big big big powerful assualt weapon? Awwww. It will be ok.

You have the burden of proof on that.

I don't know where you live that have people strutting around and just shooting their guns off, but I recommend that you move asap.

We had an assualt weapon ban and a high capacity magazines ban and it was fine. It was not struck down....pathetically it expired. It will be even more pathetic if we do not reinstate it.

Recent bans have been ruled unconstitutional pending appeal. It's likely scotus will rule on this again. It's highly likely that the original ban was also unconstitutional given recent court outcome. So again, you have the burden of proof.

Scotus? One scotus rules a right is constitutional and the next one strips it away. Scotus is political and the rulings will change according to who is on the court.