Is Ginni Thomas A Threat To The Supreme Court?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is absolutely fascinating.

Reading the exchange of texts between Ginni Thomas and Mark Meadows (see WaPo): I strongly suspect that Meadows lives in the real world and knows there was no election fraud, but is willing to enable the insurrection as long as there's political benefit to him. He's corrupt but not blind. And that Thomas, however, is completely crazy and really believes this stuff, as well as QAnon conspiracy theories. He's trying to fend her off with short texts of thanks, but comes off as distinctly less sincere and gun-ho about the entire concept of election fraud.

+1. I am just appalled by the situation, particularly the fact that the justice did not recuse himself and that his wife was so actively involved in the plot to change the election's result while her husband is on the SC. but most surprising for me, I always thought that these prominent people like G. Thomas, but also gen. Flynn, were right wing POS ready to do and say anything and everything to keep power to their side, but that at the same time they know Q lies are lies and so on. Basically, they are rational people with no morals who spread conspiracies and lies to the dumb masses for their advantage. Instead, both in the case of G. Thomas and gen Flynn, it looks like they really believe what they say, in other words they are truly nutjobs.

Yes. And it wouldn't surprise me to know that Justice Thomas (all incompetent and ultra conservative that he is) privately regrets that his wife is so out there and has been a liability for him all these years. There are plenty of couples like this, who do not want to divorce, but who disagree on fundamental ideas.

[Anonymous]

I doubt it. Ginni is a feature, not a bug, in that household.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I doubt it. Ginni is a feature, not a bug, in that household.

+1
There is zero evidence that Ginni and Clarence aren’t cut from the same extremist cloth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Please note, the stuff Ginni Thomas is saying in these texts are unadulterated Qanon conspiracy theories. Which apparently her husband, one of 9 Supreme Court Justices, also believes?

I said, as did others, that by making the admission last week about being at Jan 6, 2021, she was getting ahead of something. That something is the 29 texts she sent to Meadows. She certainly did have plenty to do with the protest. She is clearly unhinged and I think Clarence is in this up to his eyeballs. I'm sure there are doctors one can go to to hide you in the hospital when things get stressful. This man needs to retire at the very minimum. He failed to recuse and he is corrupt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is absolutely fascinating.

Reading the exchange of texts between Ginni Thomas and Mark Meadows (see WaPo): I strongly suspect that Meadows lives in the real world and knows there was no election fraud, but is willing to enable the insurrection as long as there's political benefit to him. He's corrupt but not blind. And that Thomas, however, is completely crazy and really believes this stuff, as well as QAnon conspiracy theories. He's trying to fend her off with short texts of thanks, but comes off as distinctly less sincere and gun-ho about the entire concept of election fraud.

+1. I am just appalled by the situation, particularly the fact that the justice did not recuse himself and that his wife was so actively involved in the plot to change the election's result while her husband is on the SC. but most surprising for me, I always thought that these prominent people like G. Thomas, but also gen. Flynn, were right wing POS ready to do and say anything and everything to keep power to their side, but that at the same time they know Q lies are lies and so on. Basically, they are rational people with no morals who spread conspiracies and lies to the dumb masses for their advantage. Instead, both in the case of G. Thomas and gen Flynn, it looks like they really believe what they say, in other words they are truly nutjobs.

Yes. And it wouldn't surprise me to know that Justice Thomas (all incompetent and ultra conservative that he is) privately regrets that his wife is so out there and has been a liability for him all these years. There are plenty of couples like this, who do not want to divorce, but who disagree on fundamental ideas.

If that’s true, then why didn’t he recuse himself from the case involving her? It’s hard to imagine a more clear conflict of interest.

[Anonymous]

I agree:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is absolutely fascinating.

Reading the exchange of texts between Ginni Thomas and Mark Meadows (see WaPo): I strongly suspect that Meadows lives in the real world and knows there was no election fraud, but is willing to enable the insurrection as long as there's political benefit to him. He's corrupt but not blind. And that Thomas, however, is completely crazy and really believes this stuff, as well as QAnon conspiracy theories. He's trying to fend her off with short texts of thanks, but comes off as distinctly less sincere and gun-ho about the entire concept of election fraud.

+1. I am just appalled by the situation, particularly the fact that the justice did not recuse himself and that his wife was so actively involved in the plot to change the election's result while her husband is on the SC. but most surprising for me, I always thought that these prominent people like G. Thomas, but also gen. Flynn, were right wing POS ready to do and say anything and everything to keep power to their side, but that at the same time they know Q lies are lies and so on. Basically, they are rational people with no morals who spread conspiracies and lies to the dumb masses for their advantage. Instead, both in the case of G. Thomas and gen Flynn, it looks like they really believe what they say, in other words they are truly nutjobs.

Yes. And it wouldn't surprise me to know that Justice Thomas (all incompetent and ultra conservative that he is) privately regrets that his wife is so out there and has been a liability for him all these years. There are plenty of couples like this, who do not want to divorce, but who disagree on fundamental ideas.

If that’s true, then why didn’t he recuse himself from the case involving her? It’s hard to imagine a more clear conflict of interest.

IOKIYAR

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

This is absolutely fascinating.

Reading the exchange of texts between Ginni Thomas and Mark Meadows (see WaPo): I strongly suspect that Meadows lives in the real world and knows there was no election fraud, but is willing to enable the insurrection as long as there's political benefit to him. He's corrupt but not blind. And that Thomas, however, is completely crazy and really believes this stuff, as well as QAnon conspiracy theories. He's trying to fend her off with short texts of thanks, but comes off as distinctly less sincere and gun-ho about the entire concept of election fraud.

Meadows has always been like that. He's a rich guy from NC he likes to get attention and to feel relevant. That's how he was in Congress and one of the reasons he quickly cozied up to Trump. He's like Lindsay Graham in that regard. You can say the same about a lot of the GOPers in congress who like to play at being crazy. They're mostly wealthy or from privileged backgrounds who mainly enjoy the limelight and living life in the pocket of wealthy donors. There are *some* legit wackos...but most are mere opportunists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is absolutely fascinating.

Reading the exchange of texts between Ginni Thomas and Mark Meadows (see WaPo): I strongly suspect that Meadows lives in the real world and knows there was no election fraud, but is willing to enable the insurrection as long as there's political benefit to him. He's corrupt but not blind. And that Thomas, however, is completely crazy and really believes this stuff, as well as QAnon conspiracy theories. He's trying to fend her off with short texts of thanks, but comes off as distinctly less sincere and gun-ho about the entire concept of election fraud.

+1. I am just appalled by the situation, particularly the fact that the justice did not recuse himself and that his wife was so actively involved in the plot to change the election's result while her husband is on the SC. but most surprising for me, I always thought that these prominent people like G. Thomas, but also gen. Flynn, were right wing POS ready to do and say anything and everything to keep power to their side, but that at the same time they know Q lies are lies and so on. Basically, they are rational people with no morals who spread conspiracies and lies to the dumb masses for their advantage. Instead, both in the case of G. Thomas and gen Flynn, it looks like they really believe what they say, in other words they are truly nutjobs.

Yes. And it wouldn't surprise me to know that Justice Thomas (all incompetent and ultra conservative that he is) privately regrets that his wife is so out there and has been a liability for him all these years. There are plenty of couples like this, who do not want to divorce, but who disagree on fundamental ideas.

Errr...I wouldn't be so sure about that. His judicial record says he's just as crazy as she is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is absolutely fascinating.

Reading the exchange of texts between Ginni Thomas and Mark Meadows (see WaPo): I strongly suspect that Meadows lives in the real world and knows there was no election fraud, but is willing to enable the insurrection as long as there's political benefit to him. He's corrupt but not blind. And that Thomas, however, is completely crazy and really believes this stuff, as well as QAnon conspiracy theories. He's trying to fend her off with short texts of thanks, but comes off as distinctly less sincere and gun-ho about the entire concept of election fraud.

Meadows has always been like that. He's a rich guy from NC he likes to get attention and to feel relevant. That's how he was in Congress and one of the reasons he quickly cozied up to Trump. He's like Lindsay Graham in that regard. You can say the same about a lot of the GOPers in congress who like to play at being crazy. They're mostly wealthy or from privileged backgrounds who mainly enjoy the limelight and living life in the pocket of wealthy donors. There are *some* legit wackos...but most are mere opportunists.

+1

Like Kennedy. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/11/22/our-foghorn-leghorn-republican-senator-little-resembles-his-former-democratic-self-louisiana-we-know-type/

[Anonymous]

I wonder what is going on with Meadow's and his committee referral to the DOJ?

There is much we don't know yet.

[Anonymous]

Yes! She supported overthrowing an election!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes! She supported overthrowing an election!!

And still the “moderate” democrats stand by her and the Supreme Court!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes! She supported overthrowing an election!!

And still the “moderate” democrats stand by her and the Supreme Court!

Who are these moderate democrats standing by her? Did I miss something?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes! She supported overthrowing an election!!

And still the “moderate” democrats stand by her and the Supreme Court!

What? I am a moderate Democrat. I am also a feminist who fully supports women being politically active outside of the views of a spouse. Women can have their own careers and interests that are completely independent from your husband’s. But 1/6 is beyond the pale. She was using her contacts, gained through her husband, to support overturning an election…. and a fair one at that!! She supported and tried to facilitate an insurrection!