We got a human trafficker on the site. |
There was a long thread about this from 2020. Do a search. |
4 plain old smart kids. One is an athlete, but she literally could have picked any school in the country. |
What kind of stats would a plain old smart kid have? |
|
The stats don't really matter...when you get to the point of being considered for admissions, you have crossed whatever threshold these schools have - 1500 or 1550, 3.75 UW with the most rigorous classes taken, strong and unique ECs.
The difference in a .10 or .20 for the GPA or 20 points on the SAT aren't going to make or break. What is your story, what do you have to offer to the college's community. It isn't like everyone getting in is a 5.0, 1600 SAT applicant. So asking about their stats is really missing the point. There are thousands more qualified applicants than there are slots available at these schools, so you have to stand out in some way, and there is no secret sauce to standing out. Just live you life and see where the chips fall. |
2 smart. 2 legacy. |
2 smart. 2 smart and legacy, FTFY |
| So your inference is that the 2 legacy aren't smart or as smart as the others. In these cases, you would be wrong. Those kids would have gotten in on their own merit, irrespective of legacy status. It is really an offensive concept the inference that these kids would not have been admitted otherwise. |
|
But legacy matters, right? It matters in private school admissions (legacy of that school and/or a highly-ranked college/uni). It matters in college admissions. As a PP said, there are plenty of equally qualified applicants who don’t get the legacy thumb on the scale. If these smart legacies were in the same bucket of unhooked applicants, their odds would be lower.
Who gets into the schools with no legacy hook? |
| its not just legacy, its also buying your way in . |
| That’s how it works. It’s an offensive concept but offensive to whom? Ask the applicant who is a smart non-legacy how offensive the system is. |
more like pathetically insecure |
Only the insecure A-holes. It's a pattern I have noticed over the years. Sad but true. |
Legacy does not matter nearly as much in college admissions as it does in the small and insignificant world of DC area private schools. Seriously get a grip. If the kid is a super star and has legacy status that might help, but it doesn't just "get them in", like in private K-12 schools. The world is a big place. |
It simply is not true that legacy didn't help them over the line. They are literally in a different pile. Plenty of just as smart, non-legacy kids don't get in. Every year. Legacy matters. Own it. It does not mean they aren't qualified; it means they had a hook that other qualified kids didn't have. Without legacy, they may not have been admitted, just like all the other geniuses and valedictorians who got rejected. |