The Mueller Report

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The obstruction facts are clear cut. A reasonable legal proceeding (or impeachment for a sitting President) would likely find guilt.

What did he obstruct?

This should help:

https://www.lawfareblog.com/obstruction-justice-mueller-report-heat-map

[Anonymous]

The John Down audio is pretty brutal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The obstruction facts are clear cut. A reasonable legal proceeding (or impeachment for a sitting President) would likely find guilt.

What did he obstruct?

He lost his temper and yelled at some people. He did not fire Mueller. He handed over tons of documents. He did not prevent anyone from testifying.

When you read the Mueller selection from the Dowd voicemail and compare it to the reality, it does make you wonder about their other "evidence" of obstruction.

Read the Mueller report. It is 468 pages. Take a few days, and then you will have your answer.

[Anonymous]

Read the Mueller report. It is 468 pages. Take a few days, and then you will have your answer.

How do you explain the selective editing of the Dowd voicemail?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The obstruction facts are clear cut. A reasonable legal proceeding (or impeachment for a sitting President) would likely find guilt.

What did he obstruct?

He lost his temper and yelled at some people. He did not fire Mueller. He handed over tons of documents. He did not prevent anyone from testifying.

When you read the Mueller selection from the Dowd voicemail and compare it to the reality, it does make you wonder about their other "evidence" of obstruction.

+1.

The new crime is "intention of obstruction of justice," and can be detected just by looking at your face.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Read the Mueller report. It is 468 pages. Take a few days, and then you will have your answer.

How do you explain the selective editing of the Dowd voicemail?

The audio of the voice mail is public. It is a clear example of obstruction of justice. Crystal clear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Read the Mueller report. It is 468 pages. Take a few days, and then you will have your answer.

How do you explain the selective editing of the Dowd voicemail?

How do you explain the more selective release, willful misinterpretation and extreme editing by AG William Barr of the Mueller report?

[Anonymous]

How do you explain the more selective release, willful misinterpretation and extreme editing by AG William Barr of the Mueller report?

????
Barr did not edit the report. He asked Mueller to give it to him with the redactions of classified material and grand jury information. Mueller chose not to do so. The only thing that was "edited" was the redactions of highly classified and grand jury information. Pretty sure that someone from Mueller's team participated in that action. Other than that, pretty much everything was released to the public, and more was released to Congress. That is not "editing." It is the law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Read the Mueller report. It is 468 pages. Take a few days, and then you will have your answer.

How do you explain the selective editing of the Dowd voicemail?

The audio of the voice mail is public. It is a clear example of obstruction of justice. Crystal clear.

See... this makes me laugh. And, it is why many of us just shake our heads at the claim of obstruction of justice.
The audio is absolutely NOT a "clear example of obstruction of justice." It is a clear example of typical call between attorneys who had a joint defense agreement.

[Anonymous]

The REAL investigation of the real perps has just begun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

How do you explain the more selective release, willful misinterpretation and extreme editing by AG William Barr of the Mueller report?

????
Barr did not edit the report. He asked Mueller to give it to him with the redactions of classified material and grand jury information. Mueller chose not to do so. The only thing that was "edited" was the redactions of highly classified and grand jury information. Pretty sure that someone from Mueller's team participated in that action. Other than that, pretty much everything was released to the public, and more was released to Congress. That is not "editing." It is the law.

Sorry dems, looks like another trump victory.
Maga!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
How do you explain the more selective release, willful misinterpretation and extreme editing by AG William Barr of the Mueller report?


????
Barr did not edit the report. He asked Mueller to give it to him with the redactions of classified material and grand jury information. Mueller chose not to do so. The only thing that was "edited" was the redactions of highly classified and grand jury information. Pretty sure that someone from Mueller's team participated in that action. Other than that, pretty much everything was released to the public, and more was released to Congress. That is not "editing." It is the law.

Sorry dems, looks like another trump victory.
Maga!!

DP here. I think the first poster mean to say the summary of the Mueller report and not the report itself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
How do you explain the more selective release, willful misinterpretation and extreme editing by AG William Barr of the Mueller report?


????
Barr did not edit the report. He asked Mueller to give it to him with the redactions of classified material and grand jury information. Mueller chose not to do so. The only thing that was "edited" was the redactions of highly classified and grand jury information. Pretty sure that someone from Mueller's team participated in that action. Other than that, pretty much everything was released to the public, and more was released to Congress. That is not "editing." It is the law.

Sorry dems, looks like another trump victory.
Maga!!

DP here. I think the first poster mean to say the summary of the Mueller report and not the report itself.

It wasn't a summary of the report. It was a summary of the findings. Big difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Judge Sullivan demands that public gets to learn everything Trump's lawyer John Dowd said in voice mail to Flynn's lawyer. In his calls, Dowd appeared to suggest it wasn't good idea for Flynn to cooperate, it would upset Donald Trump.

When Trump's lawyer has to lawyer up....

Dowd was all in

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trumps-lawyer-wrote-presidents-sloppy-tweet-flynns-dismissal/story


He should be disbarred and prosecuted.

Audio of Dowd’s voicemail to Flynn’s lawyer has been released.
https://twitter.com/joshscampbell/status/1136738942076637184?s=21

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Judge Sullivan demands that public gets to learn everything Trump's lawyer John Dowd said in voice mail to Flynn's lawyer. In his calls, Dowd appeared to suggest it wasn't good idea for Flynn to cooperate, it would upset Donald Trump.

When Trump's lawyer has to lawyer up....

Dowd was all in

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trumps-lawyer-wrote-presidents-sloppy-tweet-flynns-dismissal/story


He should be disbarred and prosecuted.

Audio of Dowd’s voicemail to Flynn’s lawyer has been released.
https://twitter.com/joshscampbell/status/1136738942076637184?s=21

"Implicates the president."