Official Trump VP thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The genius of this pick is that the white supremacists will come out of their caves to attack Vance’s wife, and then Trump can tack to the center by attacking fringe actors like Ann Coulter, Nick Fuentes, and other literal racists who are gonna be pissed that a Hindu woman is potentially going to be First Lady.

The white liberal women activists in here still don’t get that vibes and optics far more that policy, and Vance and his cute Indian wife and their cute biracial kids are gonna be a huge boon for the campaign in the multiracial suburbs of DC, NY, Philly, etc. Think about how many votes having an actual Hindu woman on the ticket gets in places like Jackson Heights or how having just a brown woman who’s a daughter of immigrants plays with POC women who aren’t Black.

You can’t privilege identity politics on one hand and then act like her identity isn’t going to matter to some voters in November. In those swing states with multiracial suburban populations this will get you some numbers if played right.

So you think JD Vance's wife being Indian will matter more than Kamala Harris being Indian?

How do you think women in the suburbs will feel about him saying there should be no rape or incest exceptions for abortion bans? Who cares, he has a cute family and went to Yale?

This is such BS. Lots of BS coming from the left, including the Biden team:

Vance is opposed to abortion; on the website for his 2022 campaign for the Senate, he declared himself “100 percent pro-life” and called for “eliminating abortion.” However, he said on CNN in December 2023: “We have to accept that people do not want blanket abortion bans. They just don’t. And I say that as a person who wants to protect as many unborn babies as possible. We have to provide exceptions for life of the mother, for rape, and so forth.”

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/10/politics/fact-check-biden-campaign-j-d-vance-heritage-foundation/index.html

He is aggressively anti abortion. What the right says about this issue is of little consequence since they trot out a pack of lies. What they did destroy the protections provided to women in Roe. That is way more important than a bunch of cheap slimy talk.

What you posted, above, was a lie. But I see you can't admit it. He clearly states there have to be exceptions for life of the mother, rape, etc. Do keep up your unhinged rants, chock full of lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The genius of this pick is that the white supremacists will come out of their caves to attack Vance’s wife, and then Trump can tack to the center by attacking fringe actors like Ann Coulter, Nick Fuentes, and other literal racists who are gonna be pissed that a Hindu woman is potentially going to be First Lady.

The white liberal women activists in here still don’t get that vibes and optics far more that policy, and Vance and his cute Indian wife and their cute biracial kids are gonna be a huge boon for the campaign in the multiracial suburbs of DC, NY, Philly, etc. Think about how many votes having an actual Hindu woman on the ticket gets in places like Jackson Heights or how having just a brown woman who’s a daughter of immigrants plays with POC women who aren’t Black.

You can’t privilege identity politics on one hand and then act like her identity isn’t going to matter to some voters in November. In those swing states with multiracial suburban populations this will get you some numbers if played right.

There isn’t a Hindu woman on the ticket you dolt. Someone on the ticket is married to a hindu woman. Let me guess you think your husband’s accomplishments are yours because you clearly are not smart enough to have your own if you think one guy having cute kids will get the ticket to win in areas it otherwise wouldn’t.

You severely overestimate the intellect of people, and American voters specifically, if you think this is the case. We live in a democracy and most people are stupid. Full stop.

Trump got elected. Do you need any more proof than that?

Yes, and then people saw exactly what kind of dangerous moron he was and voted him out.

Now explain the Reagan landslide in 1984 and special needs case George Bush winning two terms.

People are dumb and care about “who to get a beer with” and “do I relate to / look like this person” more than policy, especially in the social media age.

DP. I hope you're including yourself in the dumb pile. Who calls someone "special needs" in that derogatory way? What kind of person are you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have voted Dem for 4 decades and am teetering toward Trump, in part because of his genius choice of Vance. I’ve taken the time to study his positions, sans the MSM bias.

And hopefully, sans the DCUM bias.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The genius of this pick is that the white supremacists will come out of their caves to attack Vance’s wife, and then Trump can tack to the center by attacking fringe actors like Ann Coulter, Nick Fuentes, and other literal racists who are gonna be pissed that a Hindu woman is potentially going to be First Lady.

The white liberal women activists in here still don’t get that vibes and optics far more that policy, and Vance and his cute Indian wife and their cute biracial kids are gonna be a huge boon for the campaign in the multiracial suburbs of DC, NY, Philly, etc. Think about how many votes having an actual Hindu woman on the ticket gets in places like Jackson Heights or how having just a brown woman who’s a daughter of immigrants plays with POC women who aren’t Black.

You can’t privilege identity politics on one hand and then act like her identity isn’t going to matter to some voters in November. In those swing states with multiracial suburban populations this will get you some numbers if played right.

So you think JD Vance's wife being Indian will matter more than Kamala Harris being Indian?

How do you think women in the suburbs will feel about him saying there should be no rape or incest exceptions for abortion bans? Who cares, he has a cute family and went to Yale?

This is such BS. Lots of BS coming from the left, including the Biden team:

Vance is opposed to abortion; on the website for his 2022 campaign for the Senate, he declared himself “100 percent pro-life” and called for “eliminating abortion.” However, he said on CNN in December 2023: “We have to accept that people do not want blanket abortion bans. They just don’t. And I say that as a person who wants to protect as many unborn babies as possible. We have to provide exceptions for life of the mother, for rape, and so forth.”

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/10/politics/fact-check-biden-campaign-j-d-vance-heritage-foundation/index.html

He is aggressively anti abortion. What the right says about this issue is of little consequence since they trot out a pack of lies. What they did destroy the protections provided to women in Roe. That is way more important than a bunch of cheap slimy talk.

What you posted, above, was a lie. But I see you can't admit it. He clearly states there have to be exceptions for life of the mother, rape, etc. Do keep up your unhinged rants, chock full of lies.

Sorry, bubba. He was against it before he was for it: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/vance-abortion-rape/2021/09/24/c3007318-1d32-11ec-8380-5fbadbc43ef8_story.html

Kind of a spineless cheese curd.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have voted Dem for 4 decades and am teetering toward Trump, in part because of his genius choice of Vance. I’ve taken the time to study his positions, sans the MSM bias.

When will you guys learn these posts aren’t believable? Republicans online love to pose as Dems voting for Trump but then lay it on way too thick. “I have exclusively voted for democrats since the 60s; I was an anti-war protestor who marched on Selma and in my spare time I volunteer at abortion clinics and my local mosque. That being said I will be voting for trump because I think trans girls shouldn’t play sports.” How stupid do you think we are?

Ooh, now tell us about the posts, clearly written by Democrats, lying, ranting, and hysterically spinning facts of Vance's life to suit their own partisan narratives. You people are beyond help.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The genius of this pick is that the white supremacists will come out of their caves to attack Vance’s wife, and then Trump can tack to the center by attacking fringe actors like Ann Coulter, Nick Fuentes, and other literal racists who are gonna be pissed that a Hindu woman is potentially going to be First Lady.

The white liberal women activists in here still don’t get that vibes and optics far more that policy, and Vance and his cute Indian wife and their cute biracial kids are gonna be a huge boon for the campaign in the multiracial suburbs of DC, NY, Philly, etc. Think about how many votes having an actual Hindu woman on the ticket gets in places like Jackson Heights or how having just a brown woman who’s a daughter of immigrants plays with POC women who aren’t Black.

You can’t privilege identity politics on one hand and then act like her identity isn’t going to matter to some voters in November. In those swing states with multiracial suburban populations this will get you some numbers if played right.

So you think JD Vance's wife being Indian will matter more than Kamala Harris being Indian?

How do you think women in the suburbs will feel about him saying there should be no rape or incest exceptions for abortion bans? Who cares, he has a cute family and went to Yale?

This is such BS. Lots of BS coming from the left, including the Biden team:

Vance is opposed to abortion; on the website for his 2022 campaign for the Senate, he declared himself “100 percent pro-life” and called for “eliminating abortion.” However, he said on CNN in December 2023: “We have to accept that people do not want blanket abortion bans. They just don’t. And I say that as a person who wants to protect as many unborn babies as possible. We have to provide exceptions for life of the mother, for rape, and so forth.”

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/10/politics/fact-check-biden-campaign-j-d-vance-heritage-foundation/index.html

He is aggressively anti abortion. What the right says about this issue is of little consequence since they trot out a pack of lies. What they did destroy the protections provided to women in Roe. That is way more important than a bunch of cheap slimy talk.

What you posted, above, was a lie. But I see you can't admit it. He clearly states there have to be exceptions for life of the mother, rape, etc. Do keep up your unhinged rants, chock full of lies.

He is aggressively anti abortion. He is on Trump's ticket and trump destroyed roe. Nothing about that is a lie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The genius of this pick is that the white supremacists will come out of their caves to attack Vance’s wife, and then Trump can tack to the center by attacking fringe actors like Ann Coulter, Nick Fuentes, and other literal racists who are gonna be pissed that a Hindu woman is potentially going to be First Lady.

The white liberal women activists in here still don’t get that vibes and optics far more that policy, and Vance and his cute Indian wife and their cute biracial kids are gonna be a huge boon for the campaign in the multiracial suburbs of DC, NY, Philly, etc. Think about how many votes having an actual Hindu woman on the ticket gets in places like Jackson Heights or how having just a brown woman who’s a daughter of immigrants plays with POC women who aren’t Black.

You can’t privilege identity politics on one hand and then act like her identity isn’t going to matter to some voters in November. In those swing states with multiracial suburban populations this will get you some numbers if played right.

So you think JD Vance's wife being Indian will matter more than Kamala Harris being Indian?

How do you think women in the suburbs will feel about him saying there should be no rape or incest exceptions for abortion bans? Who cares, he has a cute family and went to Yale?

This is such BS. Lots of BS coming from the left, including the Biden team:

Vance is opposed to abortion; on the website for his 2022 campaign for the Senate, he declared himself “100 percent pro-life” and called for “eliminating abortion.” However, he said on CNN in December 2023: “We have to accept that people do not want blanket abortion bans. They just don’t. And I say that as a person who wants to protect as many unborn babies as possible. We have to provide exceptions for life of the mother, for rape, and so forth.”

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/10/politics/fact-check-biden-campaign-j-d-vance-heritage-foundation/index.html

He is aggressively anti abortion. What the right says about this issue is of little consequence since they trot out a pack of lies. What they did destroy the protections provided to women in Roe. That is way more important than a bunch of cheap slimy talk.

What you posted, above, was a lie. But I see you can't admit it. He clearly states there have to be exceptions for life of the mother, rape, etc. Do keep up your unhinged rants, chock full of lies.

Sorry, bubba. He was against it before he was for it: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/vance-abortion-rape/2021/09/24/c3007318-1d32-11ec-8380-5fbadbc43ef8_story.html

Kind of a spineless cheese curd.

+100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Russ Douhat had a very revealing interview with Vance in The NY Times. Whatever your politics, it’s hard to argue that Biden, Harris, or Trump are nearly as smart or insightful as Vance, who offers nuanced, well formed answers to every question posed:

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/13/opinion/jd-vance-interview.html

This guy seems like an actual intellectual, not a lightweight peddling cliches and poll tested talking points, which is refreshing.

Talk is cheap. He would force his own wife or daughter to bear her rapist's baby. So intellectual! Such nuance! So insightful and well formed!

Keeping up the lies, I see. Here ya go. I'll post this as often as necessary. DP.

Vance is opposed to abortion; on the website for his 2022 campaign for the Senate, he declared himself “100 percent pro-life” and called for “eliminating abortion.” However, he said on CNN in December 2023: “We have to accept that people do not want blanket abortion bans. They just don’t. And I say that as a person who wants to protect as many unborn babies as possible. We have to provide exceptions for life of the mother, for rape, and so forth.”
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/10/politics/fact-check-biden-campaign-j-d-vance-heritage-foundation/index.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Russ Douhat had a very revealing interview with Vance in The NY Times. Whatever your politics, it’s hard to argue that Biden, Harris, or Trump are nearly as smart or insightful as Vance, who offers nuanced, well formed answers to every question posed:

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/13/opinion/jd-vance-interview.html

This guy seems like an actual intellectual, not a lightweight peddling cliches and poll tested talking points, which is refreshing.

Talk is cheap. He would force his own wife or daughter to bear her rapist's baby. So intellectual! Such nuance! So insightful and well formed!

Keeping up the lies, I see. Here ya go. I'll post this as often as necessary. DP.

Vance is opposed to abortion; on the website for his 2022 campaign for the Senate, he declared himself “100 percent pro-life” and called for “eliminating abortion.” However, he said on CNN in December 2023: “We have to accept that people do not want blanket abortion bans. They just don’t. And I say that as a person who wants to protect as many unborn babies as possible. We have to provide exceptions for life of the mother, for rape, and so forth.”
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/10/politics/fact-check-biden-campaign-j-d-vance-heritage-foundation/index.html

He is aggressively anti abortion. He is on Trump's ticket and trump destroyed roe. Nothing about that is a lie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Russ Douhat had a very revealing interview with Vance in The NY Times. Whatever your politics, it’s hard to argue that Biden, Harris, or Trump are nearly as smart or insightful as Vance, who offers nuanced, well formed answers to every question posed:

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/13/opinion/jd-vance-interview.html

This guy seems like an actual intellectual, not a lightweight peddling cliches and poll tested talking points, which is refreshing.

Not as intellectual as you say. Last week he was talking about "what is the first truly Islamist country that will get a nuclear weapon". And his conclusion?? "Maybe it's actually the UK - since Labor just took over". WTAF? Does he even read?

Clearly, you didn't get the joke. Anyone who knows anything about UK and Labour knows exactly what he meant. Why are liberals always so literal?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ivy League alumni who pose as anti-elite, anti-establishment, anti-intellectual, anti-expertise populists while primarily representing the interests of billionaire capitalist sociopaths are a plague that has taken over the Republican Party. Vance is phonier than Trump or Cruz or Cotton or Alito, if that is possible. It’s all a con. They jump in front of the 200+ year old nativist and bigoted and ignorant right-wing movement and appoint themselves its leaders while turning it into a vehicle for yet more tax breaks and deregulation for the capitalist establishment.

Don’t forget married in Hindu ceremony, recently “converted” to Catholicism (he only, not his wife and kids), and Mr Catholic’s billionaire puppetmaster is a sodomite.

Wait - so you think he should have insisted his wife and kids convert as well? What kind of authoritarian are you? He can be Catholic while his wife is Catholic. Get a clue.

[Anonymous]

*while his wife is Hindu

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Russ Douhat had a very revealing interview with Vance in The NY Times. Whatever your politics, it’s hard to argue that Biden, Harris, or Trump are nearly as smart or insightful as Vance, who offers nuanced, well formed answers to every question posed:

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/13/opinion/jd-vance-interview.html

This guy seems like an actual intellectual, not a lightweight peddling cliches and poll tested talking points, which is refreshing.

Talk is cheap. He would force his own wife or daughter to bear her rapist's baby. So intellectual! Such nuance! So insightful and well formed!

Also Ross refused to say he wouldn't vote for Trump, when he was interviewed on The Bulwark podcast. He is rabidly anti-choice. Of course he liked JD Vance. They are two peas in a pod.

Two doughboys.

I love these. They show exactly how racist the left is. Keep it coming, I say!

We better all see Trump's birth certificate and Vance's birth certificate.

Ok?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dems are so funny. Do you have anything to say other than snarky personal attacks?

+1. I love how they are using gay and religion as pejoratives when it suits their theme.

Do you think mentioning the words "gay" and "religion" are pejoratives?

It's not a pejorative to say it's pretty weird that a guy who wants America to be a Christian nation is married to a Hindu.

There's nothing wrong with her being Hindu. There's a lot to unpack that he thinks her religion doesn't have a place in America.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ivy League alumni who pose as anti-elite, anti-establishment, anti-intellectual, anti-expertise populists while primarily representing the interests of billionaire capitalist sociopaths are a plague that has taken over the Republican Party. Vance is phonier than Trump or Cruz or Cotton or Alito, if that is possible. It’s all a con. They jump in front of the 200+ year old nativist and bigoted and ignorant right-wing movement and appoint themselves its leaders while turning it into a vehicle for yet more tax breaks and deregulation for the capitalist establishment.

Don’t forget married in Hindu ceremony, recently “converted” to Catholicism (he only, not his wife and kids), and Mr Catholic’s billionaire puppetmaster is a sodomite.

You put converted in quotation marks, implying that it was insincere and, thus, politically motivated.

Who on earth thinks converting to Catholicism is a winning political move?

Speaking as a cradle catholic, converts are by and large more conservative than us. I doubt JD's church is like, say, Holy Trinity in Georgetown. I would bet my retirement account it's theologically and culturally conservative - probably lots of families with 5+ kids, homeschool/Catholic school is common, I would not be surprised if a lot of the parishioners thought Vatican II was "invalid" (a common debate at the church I grew up attending) and prefer to attend Latin Mass. I remember being told growing up that "good" Catholics voted for Republicans because of the pro-life issue*. Converts typically convert to that brand of tradcath. They rarely convert to the Joe Biden/Nancy Pelosi/Jesuit style Catholicism.

I was not the one who put "convert" in quotes, but it's weird to me that only he converted and not the wife or kids. I suspect this was done to network with and appeal to the Amy Coney Barrett style Catholics, who are a huge presence in conservatism.

*Conveniently neglecting the fact that "pro-life" also means you oppose the death penalty, which Republicans don't. Now I am pro-choice and pro-death penalty and I mostly vote Dem and I don't go to Mass, so you see how well those kinds of CCD lessons went over.

And most Democrats are ANTI-death penalty. So how do you square that?