Mother of 2 from VERY prominent Richmond family arrested by FBI for child p@rn, exploitation, etc

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have known Joel for over 30 years. He’s good people and I have absolutely no doubt that he is protecting his children and being an excellent father. Posters on here speculating otherwise are horrible.

No one was speculating otherwise. People were simply stating that we don’t know JH so we don’t know that he’s a good person either.

Apparently you do know him (seems doubtful since you just so happened to pop up all of a sudden on page 68 of a thread to say so during a discussion of his character). I don’t know anything about him and have no reason to think anything bad about him. I just don’t understand why people assume he’s such a great guy if they don’t know him.

Person maybe, not people.

How does your post advance anything? Genuinely curious since the post is about Eleanor? Why the derailing pointless bickering about a 3rd party who as far as anyone knows has done nothing wrong and who should not be a focus of a public thread on a chat board?

If people wish the kids well, leave them and their father alone.

There appears to be one person speculating about the fitness of the the former husband. I agree. He is not on trial here. There's no evidence to suggest he or his new wife are unfit. But this is DCUM, and everyone is just two steps away from the mental ward.

True, true. Don't think there will be much new to discuss until the June hearing.

[Anonymous]

A good lawyer knows the law a great lawyer knows the Judge. Once the trial judge is revealed, a lawyer who knows the Judge will be hired to represent Eleanor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Long story, but I was an observer in a sex offender treatment program. I met and heard the stories of many men some caught by these stings, some not caught but reached out for help.

The men that had been in the program long enough all admitted 100% that they needed to stop. All had attractions to young girls that stemmed from other issues they were fighting.

They were not victims, they themselves were glad to be in a program to try to change. Some had to come back multiple times, but were willing to continue to try to break the pattern.

Men are very unwilling to get help until they are compelled to do so. The stings are not the problem.

Most of them show up to these programs to get their rocks off from hearing the the stories of other's experiences.

[Anonymous]

Was Eleanor the one who was charged with undressing in public? Or a different woman? Your post says “the woman” and I wasn’t sure which woman. I also know the family. Feel so sorry for her ex husband.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A good lawyer knows the law a great lawyer knows the Judge. Once the trial judge is revealed, a lawyer who knows the Judge will be hired to represent Eleanor.

As a lawyer, although not criminal defense, I see this as quite likely. The PD was a placeholder.

I do wonder about what seemed like PR posts re: the family's relief that she was locked up. Then Epa was offered as a 3rd party custodian. Must just have been a troll.

I hope she will be ordered held somewhere for a very long time, even St. E's.

The + of the publicity is that she will no longer pass background checks to be near kids, finally.

The - of the publicity is the impact on those poor kids. Genuinely hope they are relocated, and last name is changed.

I think the investigation into her actions will be curtailed to this incident with a lot of strings pulled and favors called in.

Once the parents are no longer on earth, perhaps then her level of consequences will be higher.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Was Eleanor the one who was charged with undressing in public? Or a different woman? Your post says “the woman” and I wasn’t sure which woman. I also know the family. Feel so sorry for her ex husband.

Not the poster you are referring to but, yes, she was. The 2019 citation and a lot of the divorce docs are linked in the DM article.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have known Joel for over 30 years. He’s good people and I have absolutely no doubt that he is protecting his children and being an excellent father. Posters on here speculating otherwise are horrible.

No one was speculating otherwise. People were simply stating that we don’t know JH so we don’t know that he’s a good person either.

Apparently you do know him (seems doubtful since you just so happened to pop up all of a sudden on page 68 of a thread to say so during a discussion of his character). I don’t know anything about him and have no reason to think anything bad about him. I just don’t understand why people assume he’s such a great guy if they don’t know him.

I don’t care whether you have doubts that I know him or not. I’ve posted re that before, maybe actually read the thread. Stop suggesting things. People called you out, including me. I said it before and I will say it again (in Richmond terms): Joel is good people. Whatever your hang ups are, just stop.

[Anonymous]

I'm sure there are those who love, support, and recognize the positive things Eleanor's done in her life, too. No one is totally bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Eleanor the one who was charged with undressing in public? Or a different woman? Your post says “the woman” and I wasn’t sure which woman. I also know the family. Feel so sorry for her ex husband.

Not the poster you are referring to but, yes, she was. The 2019 citation and a lot of the divorce docs are linked in the DM article.

Where is the DM article?

[Anonymous]

Was there a post on this thread about her brother having a bunch of issues and breaking the law too? It does make you wonder what was happening in this very prominent family.

[Anonymous]

Update: her request to be released from jail because she is a UVA grad was denied.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12017675/Socialite-mom-45-arrested-child-porn-sting-denied-bid-pre-trial-release.html

[Anonymous]

Is she actually wealthy? It does not seem so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Update: her request to be released from jail because she is a UVA grad was denied.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12017675/Socialite-mom-45-arrested-child-porn-sting-denied-bid-pre-trial-release.html

This is the most disturbing revalation in that update:

The ruling against her release also contains the startling claim that she 'allegedly used her own minor daughters as a lure to engage with the undercover officer, who she believed to have access to a minor child'.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Eleanor the one who was charged with undressing in public? Or a different woman? Your post says “the woman” and I wasn’t sure which woman. I also know the family. Feel so sorry for her ex husband.

Not the poster you are referring to but, yes, she was. The 2019 citation and a lot of the divorce docs are linked in the DM article.

Where is the DM article?

It's linked in this thread or you could google her name and Daily Mail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Update: her request to be released from jail because she is a UVA grad was denied.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12017675/Socialite-mom-45-arrested-child-porn-sting-denied-bid-pre-trial-release.html

The DM article was from last week, it was discussed upthread.