Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not getting anything you asked the Judge for and paying your lawyers $bank$ = bad day in court for Blake.

Winning the venue battle matters.

I don't think Reynolds and Lively care that much about lawyer costs.

Freedman did this to move the case along faster. What are you talking about winning a battle???

There was a story someone posted up thread about why Freedman wanted the case in California. Even if he did it to expedite, it's still a loss. It means Freedman has to travel to NY for all the hearings and will lose certain advantages to being in a familiar court.

Given that all the motions were decided in his favor it’s clear that Lively has no home court advantage. I really can’t believe her lawyers actually made the request to bar Freedman from deposing her. Such a bad look for both her and them. They obviously can’t control her.

How unusual is it for someone to ask their lawyer to make such a request? I understand it doesn't look good from a lay person's point of view, but like, from a legal standpoint, can you explain just how entitled such a request is?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The speed at which many people have reversed course after the Blake Lively complaint was released and are re-siding with Justin is honestly a little surprising to me. Like they're actually going through Justin's long-ass document and believing him.

I find all of Justin's rebuttals credible, but I wonder if it goes to show that many people really do not like Blake and were waiting just waiting to turn on her once they got some receipts. This is why the effort to restore her reputation baffles me -- they're willing to go through hell with this lawsuit, but they don't offer any sort of counter-PR campaign to actually make her look good?

Why don't they circulate stories about how nice she is? There have to be people out there who had good experiences with her (I remember in her early GG days, there were, so I do not believe Blake is a sociopath). Why didn't they have her apologize to that Norwegian journalist? It's just shocking and shows a total lack of humility.

That interview with that Noweigian journalist with the mocking of the baby bump and the sarcastic side convo with Parker Posey was just horrid. There are multiple interviews out there displaying what a smug woman child Blake actually is. Is she trying to be funny? And no, I would say the same about a smug man child as well, so I am not a misogynist. I was really indifferent to Blake Lively prior to seeing that interview, I now see her as entitled nepo baby brat that she is. There was absolutely no excuse for her behaving that way. It was disgraceful. This debacle with Justin just reinforces my negative opinion of her.

PP Yeah, I don't think people fully appreciate just how much that video killed her reputation in comparison to the other stuff.

The Blake Lively supporters need to go watch that interview right now and try and defend that atrocious behavior from a grown woman. It was so bad it was almost satire. I would argue that interview was more devastating to her reputation than this Justin nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The speed at which many people have reversed course after the Blake Lively complaint was released and are re-siding with Justin is honestly a little surprising to me. Like they're actually going through Justin's long-ass document and believing him.

I find all of Justin's rebuttals credible, but I wonder if it goes to show that many people really do not like Blake and were waiting just waiting to turn on her once they got some receipts. This is why the effort to restore her reputation baffles me -- they're willing to go through hell with this lawsuit, but they don't offer any sort of counter-PR campaign to actually make her look good?

Why don't they circulate stories about how nice she is? There have to be people out there who had good experiences with her (I remember in her early GG days, there were, so I do not believe Blake is a sociopath). Why didn't they have her apologize to that Norwegian journalist? It's just shocking and shows a total lack of humility.

That interview with that Noweigian journalist with the mocking of the baby bump and the sarcastic side convo with Parker Posey was just horrid. There are multiple interviews out there displaying what a smug woman child Blake actually is. Is she trying to be funny? And no, I would say the same about a smug man child as well, so I am not a misogynist. I was really indifferent to Blake Lively prior to seeing that interview, I now see her as entitled nepo baby brat that she is. There was absolutely no excuse for her behaving that way. It was disgraceful. This debacle with Justin just reinforces my negative opinion of her.

So I guess the Baldoni proposal video to his wife is adorbs and not smug, since you're not mentioning it at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The speed at which many people have reversed course after the Blake Lively complaint was released and are re-siding with Justin is honestly a little surprising to me. Like they're actually going through Justin's long-ass document and believing him.

I find all of Justin's rebuttals credible, but I wonder if it goes to show that many people really do not like Blake and were waiting just waiting to turn on her once they got some receipts. This is why the effort to restore her reputation baffles me -- they're willing to go through hell with this lawsuit, but they don't offer any sort of counter-PR campaign to actually make her look good?

Why don't they circulate stories about how nice she is? There have to be people out there who had good experiences with her (I remember in her early GG days, there were, so I do not believe Blake is a sociopath). Why didn't they have her apologize to that Norwegian journalist? It's just shocking and shows a total lack of humility.

That interview with that Noweigian journalist with the mocking of the baby bump and the sarcastic side convo with Parker Posey was just horrid. There are multiple interviews out there displaying what a smug woman child Blake actually is. Is she trying to be funny? And no, I would say the same about a smug man child as well, so I am not a misogynist. I was really indifferent to Blake Lively prior to seeing that interview, I now see her as entitled nepo baby brat that she is. There was absolutely no excuse for her behaving that way. It was disgraceful. This debacle with Justin just reinforces my negative opinion of her.

So I guess the Baldoni proposal video to his wife is adorbs and not smug, since you're not mentioning it at all.

Dp The prompt here is: "what led to the Blake Lively backlash last summer and how could she have restored her reputation," not "here's why blake lively is a bad person and her's why justin baldoni is a good person." No one is arguing the latter, so what relevance does his proposal video have to do with this? Get with the program.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The speed at which many people have reversed course after the Blake Lively complaint was released and are re-siding with Justin is honestly a little surprising to me. Like they're actually going through Justin's long-ass document and believing him.

I find all of Justin's rebuttals credible, but I wonder if it goes to show that many people really do not like Blake and were waiting just waiting to turn on her once they got some receipts. This is why the effort to restore her reputation baffles me -- they're willing to go through hell with this lawsuit, but they don't offer any sort of counter-PR campaign to actually make her look good?

Why don't they circulate stories about how nice she is? There have to be people out there who had good experiences with her (I remember in her early GG days, there were, so I do not believe Blake is a sociopath). Why didn't they have her apologize to that Norwegian journalist? It's just shocking and shows a total lack of humility.

That interview with that Noweigian journalist with the mocking of the baby bump and the sarcastic side convo with Parker Posey was just horrid. There are multiple interviews out there displaying what a smug woman child Blake actually is. Is she trying to be funny? And no, I would say the same about a smug man child as well, so I am not a misogynist. I was really indifferent to Blake Lively prior to seeing that interview, I now see her as entitled nepo baby brat that she is. There was absolutely no excuse for her behaving that way. It was disgraceful. This debacle with Justin just reinforces my negative opinion of her.

PP Yeah, I don't think people fully appreciate just how much that video killed her reputation in comparison to the other stuff.

The Blake Lively supporters need to go watch that interview right now and try and defend that atrocious behavior from a grown woman. It was so bad it was almost satire. I would argue that interview was more devastating to her reputation than this Justin nonsense.

Are you even reading this thread? Literally no one on this thread is a "Blake Lively supporter." Some of us can see both sides and think some of the Baldoni supporters are over the line in some of their rhetoric. Then you call us bots and PR reps for Lively, which is hysterical, because I'm just a 50 year old lawyer mom trying to stay awake while supervising document production going out tonight lol. I almost wish I were a Lively shill haha.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The speed at which many people have reversed course after the Blake Lively complaint was released and are re-siding with Justin is honestly a little surprising to me. Like they're actually going through Justin's long-ass document and believing him.

I find all of Justin's rebuttals credible, but I wonder if it goes to show that many people really do not like Blake and were waiting just waiting to turn on her once they got some receipts. This is why the effort to restore her reputation baffles me -- they're willing to go through hell with this lawsuit, but they don't offer any sort of counter-PR campaign to actually make her look good?

Why don't they circulate stories about how nice she is? There have to be people out there who had good experiences with her (I remember in her early GG days, there were, so I do not believe Blake is a sociopath). Why didn't they have her apologize to that Norwegian journalist? It's just shocking and shows a total lack of humility.

That interview with that Noweigian journalist with the mocking of the baby bump and the sarcastic side convo with Parker Posey was just horrid. There are multiple interviews out there displaying what a smug woman child Blake actually is. Is she trying to be funny? And no, I would say the same about a smug man child as well, so I am not a misogynist. I was really indifferent to Blake Lively prior to seeing that interview, I now see her as entitled nepo baby brat that she is. There was absolutely no excuse for her behaving that way. It was disgraceful. This debacle with Justin just reinforces my negative opinion of her.

So I guess the Baldoni proposal video to his wife is adorbs and not smug, since you're not mentioning it at all.

I am kind of indifferent towards Justin, he seems a little douchey and just awkward. I haven’t seen any interviews with him mocking the journalist and then ignoring the journalist and having a private sarcastic convo with another director. He’s odd, yes, does he appear to be a malicious mean boy? No he doesn’t. Maybe he’s just a better actor than Blake.

[Anonymous]

JB is as annoying as all get out

Still doesn’t make him a bully

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The speed at which many people have reversed course after the Blake Lively complaint was released and are re-siding with Justin is honestly a little surprising to me. Like they're actually going through Justin's long-ass document and believing him.

I find all of Justin's rebuttals credible, but I wonder if it goes to show that many people really do not like Blake and were waiting just waiting to turn on her once they got some receipts. This is why the effort to restore her reputation baffles me -- they're willing to go through hell with this lawsuit, but they don't offer any sort of counter-PR campaign to actually make her look good?

Why don't they circulate stories about how nice she is? There have to be people out there who had good experiences with her (I remember in her early GG days, there were, so I do not believe Blake is a sociopath). Why didn't they have her apologize to that Norwegian journalist? It's just shocking and shows a total lack of humility.

That interview with that Noweigian journalist with the mocking of the baby bump and the sarcastic side convo with Parker Posey was just horrid. There are multiple interviews out there displaying what a smug woman child Blake actually is. Is she trying to be funny? And no, I would say the same about a smug man child as well, so I am not a misogynist. I was really indifferent to Blake Lively prior to seeing that interview, I now see her as entitled nepo baby brat that she is. There was absolutely no excuse for her behaving that way. It was disgraceful. This debacle with Justin just reinforces my negative opinion of her.

So I guess the Baldoni proposal video to his wife is adorbs and not smug, since you're not mentioning it at all.

Well actually, PP said "And no, I would say the same about a smug man child as well, so I am not a misogynist" so I would like their thoughts on the Baldoni proposal to see whether they are actually a misogynist or not, as promised.

Dp The prompt here is: "what led to the Blake Lively backlash last summer and how could she have restored her reputation," not "here's why blake lively is a bad person and her's why justin baldoni is a good person." No one is arguing the latter, so what relevance does his proposal video have to do with this? Get with the program.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The speed at which many people have reversed course after the Blake Lively complaint was released and are re-siding with Justin is honestly a little surprising to me. Like they're actually going through Justin's long-ass document and believing him.

I find all of Justin's rebuttals credible, but I wonder if it goes to show that many people really do not like Blake and were waiting just waiting to turn on her once they got some receipts. This is why the effort to restore her reputation baffles me -- they're willing to go through hell with this lawsuit, but they don't offer any sort of counter-PR campaign to actually make her look good?

Why don't they circulate stories about how nice she is? There have to be people out there who had good experiences with her (I remember in her early GG days, there were, so I do not believe Blake is a sociopath). Why didn't they have her apologize to that Norwegian journalist? It's just shocking and shows a total lack of humility.

That interview with that Noweigian journalist with the mocking of the baby bump and the sarcastic side convo with Parker Posey was just horrid. There are multiple interviews out there displaying what a smug woman child Blake actually is. Is she trying to be funny? And no, I would say the same about a smug man child as well, so I am not a misogynist. I was really indifferent to Blake Lively prior to seeing that interview, I now see her as entitled nepo baby brat that she is. There was absolutely no excuse for her behaving that way. It was disgraceful. This debacle with Justin just reinforces my negative opinion of her.

So I guess the Baldoni proposal video to his wife is adorbs and not smug, since you're not mentioning it at all.

Dp The prompt here is: "what led to the Blake Lively backlash last summer and how could she have restored her reputation," not "here's why blake lively is a bad person and her's why justin baldoni is a good person." No one is arguing the latter, so what relevance does his proposal video have to do with this? Get with the program.

Let's try that again: Actually, PP said "And no, I would say the same about a smug man child as well, so I am not a misogynist" so I would like their thoughts on the Baldoni proposal to see whether they are actually a misogynist or not, as promised.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The speed at which many people have reversed course after the Blake Lively complaint was released and are re-siding with Justin is honestly a little surprising to me. Like they're actually going through Justin's long-ass document and believing him.

I find all of Justin's rebuttals credible, but I wonder if it goes to show that many people really do not like Blake and were waiting just waiting to turn on her once they got some receipts. This is why the effort to restore her reputation baffles me -- they're willing to go through hell with this lawsuit, but they don't offer any sort of counter-PR campaign to actually make her look good?

Why don't they circulate stories about how nice she is? There have to be people out there who had good experiences with her (I remember in her early GG days, there were, so I do not believe Blake is a sociopath). Why didn't they have her apologize to that Norwegian journalist? It's just shocking and shows a total lack of humility.

That interview with that Noweigian journalist with the mocking of the baby bump and the sarcastic side convo with Parker Posey was just horrid. There are multiple interviews out there displaying what a smug woman child Blake actually is. Is she trying to be funny? And no, I would say the same about a smug man child as well, so I am not a misogynist. I was really indifferent to Blake Lively prior to seeing that interview, I now see her as entitled nepo baby brat that she is. There was absolutely no excuse for her behaving that way. It was disgraceful. This debacle with Justin just reinforces my negative opinion of her.

So I guess the Baldoni proposal video to his wife is adorbs and not smug, since you're not mentioning it at all.

Well actually, PP said "And no, I would say the same about a smug man child as well, so I am not a misogynist" so I would like their thoughts on the Baldoni proposal to see whether they are actually a misogynist or not, as promised.

Dp The prompt here is: "what led to the Blake Lively backlash last summer and how could she have restored her reputation," not "here's why blake lively is a bad person and her's why justin baldoni is a good person." No one is arguing the latter, so what relevance does his proposal video have to do with this? Get with the program.

Okay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The speed at which many people have reversed course after the Blake Lively complaint was released and are re-siding with Justin is honestly a little surprising to me. Like they're actually going through Justin's long-ass document and believing him.

I find all of Justin's rebuttals credible, but I wonder if it goes to show that many people really do not like Blake and were waiting just waiting to turn on her once they got some receipts. This is why the effort to restore her reputation baffles me -- they're willing to go through hell with this lawsuit, but they don't offer any sort of counter-PR campaign to actually make her look good?

Why don't they circulate stories about how nice she is? There have to be people out there who had good experiences with her (I remember in her early GG days, there were, so I do not believe Blake is a sociopath). Why didn't they have her apologize to that Norwegian journalist? It's just shocking and shows a total lack of humility.

That interview with that Noweigian journalist with the mocking of the baby bump and the sarcastic side convo with Parker Posey was just horrid. There are multiple interviews out there displaying what a smug woman child Blake actually is. Is she trying to be funny? And no, I would say the same about a smug man child as well, so I am not a misogynist. I was really indifferent to Blake Lively prior to seeing that interview, I now see her as entitled nepo baby brat that she is. There was absolutely no excuse for her behaving that way. It was disgraceful. This debacle with Justin just reinforces my negative opinion of her.

So I guess the Baldoni proposal video to his wife is adorbs and not smug, since you're not mentioning it at all.

Dp The prompt here is: "what led to the Blake Lively backlash last summer and how could she have restored her reputation," not "here's why blake lively is a bad person and her's why justin baldoni is a good person." No one is arguing the latter, so what relevance does his proposal video have to do with this? Get with the program.

Let's try that again: Actually, PP said "And no, I would say the same about a smug man child as well, so I am not a misogynist" so I would like their thoughts on the Baldoni proposal to see whether they are actually a misogynist or not, as promised.

It’s gross okay, I think the proposal is gross. He is strange, but he doesn’t appear to be an entitled nepo man child. Perhaps he’s a superior actor than Blake. His awkward sanctimonious act has me fooled I suppose.

[Anonymous]

Blake Lively should settle if JB will allow and actually he should. The public is getting tired of this BS when real things are happening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Blake Lively should settle if JB will allow and actually he should. The public is getting tired of this BS when real things are happening.

There are people who claim they're tired tired of it, but I actually think many find this case a welcome distraction from the fact that a bunch of figure skating children just got pulverized.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not getting anything you asked the Judge for and paying your lawyers $bank$ = bad day in court for Blake.

Winning the venue battle matters.

I don't think Reynolds and Lively care that much about lawyer costs.

Freedman did this to move the case along faster. What are you talking about winning a battle???

There was a story someone posted up thread about why Freedman wanted the case in California. Even if he did it to expedite, it's still a loss. It means Freedman has to travel to NY for all the hearings and will lose certain advantages to being in a familiar court.

Given that all the motions were decided in his favor it’s clear that Lively has no home court advantage. I really can’t believe her lawyers actually made the request to bar Freedman from deposing her. Such a bad look for both her and them. They obviously can’t control her.

How unusual is it for someone to ask their lawyer to make such a request? I understand it doesn't look good from a lay person's point of view, but like, from a legal standpoint, can you explain just how entitled such a request is?

It’s basically unprecedented. There is zero legal grounds for it which is why her lawyers put the request in a letter instead of a motion. To make it worse, they offered no reason at all for the request.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The speed at which many people have reversed course after the Blake Lively complaint was released and are re-siding with Justin is honestly a little surprising to me. Like they're actually going through Justin's long-ass document and believing him.

I find all of Justin's rebuttals credible, but I wonder if it goes to show that many people really do not like Blake and were waiting just waiting to turn on her once they got some receipts. This is why the effort to restore her reputation baffles me -- they're willing to go through hell with this lawsuit, but they don't offer any sort of counter-PR campaign to actually make her look good?

Why don't they circulate stories about how nice she is? There have to be people out there who had good experiences with her (I remember in her early GG days, there were, so I do not believe Blake is a sociopath). Why didn't they have her apologize to that Norwegian journalist? It's just shocking and shows a total lack of humility.

That interview with that Noweigian journalist with the mocking of the baby bump and the sarcastic side convo with Parker Posey was just horrid. There are multiple interviews out there displaying what a smug woman child Blake actually is. Is she trying to be funny? And no, I would say the same about a smug man child as well, so I am not a misogynist. I was really indifferent to Blake Lively prior to seeing that interview, I now see her as entitled nepo baby brat that she is. There was absolutely no excuse for her behaving that way. It was disgraceful. This debacle with Justin just reinforces my negative opinion of her.

So I guess the Baldoni proposal video to his wife is adorbs and not smug, since you're not mentioning it at all.

His proposal: Cringe
Her interviews: Cruel