Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Not getting anything you asked the Judge for and paying your lawyers $bank$ = bad day in court for Blake. [/quote]

Winning the venue battle matters.

I don't think Reynolds and Lively care that much about lawyer costs.[/quote]

Freedman did this to move the case along faster. What are you talking about winning a battle???[/quote]

There was a story someone posted up thread about why Freedman wanted the case in California. Even if he did it to expedite, it's still a loss. It means Freedman has to travel to NY for all the hearings and will lose certain advantages to being in a familiar court.[/quote]

Given that all the motions were decided in his favor it’s clear that Lively has no home court advantage.  I really can’t believe her lawyers actually made the request to bar Freedman from deposing her.  Such a bad look for both her and them.  They obviously can’t control her.[/quote]

How unusual is it for someone to ask their lawyer to make such a request? I understand it doesn't look good from a lay person's point of view, but like, from a legal standpoint, can you explain just how entitled such a request is?[/quote]

It’s basically unprecedented. There is zero legal grounds for it which is why her lawyers put the request in a letter instead of a motion.  To make it worse, they offered no reason at all for the request.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics