Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to review: the NYT is trash, not to be trusted. But Perez Hilton and the Daily Mail are infallible.

Go JB! xoxo

Well let’s take inventory. The NYT ran the Baldoni hit piece with the sham subpoena as cover. The Daily Mail did actual investigative journalism exposing the sham subpoena. The NYT still hasn’t reported on the sham subpoena and probably won’t. The Daily Fail may be a tabloid, but even a broke clock is right twice a day.

And to prove how fake this was from the get-go and how it's standard operating procedure at The Times, that hack Megan Twohey is not only not fired, she'll be promoted and/or rewarded with a windfall from Hollywood for being a good foot soldier.

It's also worth noting Twohey is from Washington and is a GU alum. It's not out of the question she is on her personally spinning.

No. She will be mocked and judged by other NYT reporters for messing this stupid non-story up and being blinded into thinking she’s a celebrity insider and friends/confidants with the Blakes of the world.

[Anonymous]

Daily Mail may be a tabloid but it’s messy AF and I love it!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14721283/unreported-truth-picture-Taylor-Swift-Travis-Kelce-Blake-Lively-MAUREEN-CALLAHAN.html

Blake Lively has never seemed particularly bright. But her alleged attempt to blackmail Taylor Swift by threatening to leak private texts will be the end of her — socially, professionally and reputationally.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to review: the NYT is trash, not to be trusted. But Perez Hilton and the Daily Mail are infallible.

Go JB! xoxo

Well let’s take inventory. The NYT ran the Baldoni hit piece with the sham subpoena as cover. The Daily Mail did actual investigative journalism exposing the sham subpoena. The NYT still hasn’t reported on the sham subpoena and probably won’t. The Daily Fail may be a tabloid, but even a broke clock is right twice a day.

And to prove how fake this was from the get-go and how it's standard operating procedure at The Times, that hack Megan Twohey is not only not fired, she'll be promoted and/or rewarded with a windfall from Hollywood for being a good foot soldier.

It's also worth noting Twohey is from Washington and is a GU alum. It's not out of the question she is on her personally spinning.

Omg. You so, so, so want to believe you are on here interacting with celebrities and important journalists and not just housewives and moms. You’re so adamant that there aren’t bots or seeded stories against Lively, but one of you thought Lively herself was posting in here, and now Twohey. 👌

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Daily Mail may be a tabloid but it’s messy AF and I love it!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14721283/unreported-truth-picture-Taylor-Swift-Travis-Kelce-Blake-Lively-MAUREEN-CALLAHAN.html

Blake Lively has never seemed particularly bright. But her alleged attempt to blackmail Taylor Swift by threatening to leak private texts will be the end of her — socially, professionally and reputationally.

It a depends on the content of the texts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Daily Mail may be a tabloid but it’s messy AF and I love it!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14721283/unreported-truth-picture-Taylor-Swift-Travis-Kelce-Blake-Lively-MAUREEN-CALLAHAN.html

Blake Lively has never seemed particularly bright. But her alleged attempt to blackmail Taylor Swift by threatening to leak private texts will be the end of her — socially, professionally and reputationally.

What does the article say?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Daily Mail may be a tabloid but it’s messy AF and I love it!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14721283/unreported-truth-picture-Taylor-Swift-Travis-Kelce-Blake-Lively-MAUREEN-CALLAHAN.html

Blake Lively has never seemed particularly bright. But her alleged attempt to blackmail Taylor Swift by threatening to leak private texts will be the end of her — socially, professionally and reputationally.

The allegedly intelligence and business savvy of these Hollywood bozos is always fake. Blake and Ryan are both uneducated morons; Blake especially so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to try to keep the 3 pro-Baldoni people posting their bs religiously here tethered to reality, I typed “Baldoni” into Bluesky and got dozens of posts from apparent Swifties saying they hated his schick, noting his ties to scooter Braun, and saying how weird it was that his PR reps kept blaming Lively for “dragging” Swift into this when he was really the one dragging her into it. I don’t post about Baldoni on Bluesky or like posts about the case etc so there is no algorithm giving me pro-Lively content. These are just the things people anre saying about him, and they’re not good.

Are you the same wackjob who became unhinged because you noticed someone copied and pasted a random post from reddit into DCUM? If yes, not only are stalking DCUM all day, and various sub-reddits all day, and Bluesky (whatever that is?), and presumably other forums and social media?

And please don't pretend you casually noticed a random post made on reddit also made here. Only a person reading EVERYTHING all day is going to notice such a thing.

Do you not realize how insane this is? This is not healthy.

I can only speak for myself, I only casually read this thread. That's it. I check in maybe once every 10 to 20 pages.

+10000 not sure if that was ‘Arlington mom’ but that poster was nuts. She ran to Jeff and was desperately trying to get this thread shut down- her latest theory was that we’re all plagiarizing!!! And Convenient timing right before the extortion issue broke. Yes, I sound crazy myself but this poster is absolutely treating all this extremely personally.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to review: the NYT is trash, not to be trusted. But Perez Hilton and the Daily Mail are infallible.

Go JB! xoxo

Well let’s take inventory. The NYT ran the Baldoni hit piece with the sham subpoena as cover. The Daily Mail did actual investigative journalism exposing the sham subpoena. The NYT still hasn’t reported on the sham subpoena and probably won’t. The Daily Fail may be a tabloid, but even a broke clock is right twice a day.

And to prove how fake this was from the get-go and how it's standard operating procedure at The Times, that hack Megan Twohey is not only not fired, she'll be promoted and/or rewarded with a windfall from Hollywood for being a good foot soldier.

It's also worth noting Twohey is from Washington and is a GU alum. It's not out of the question she is on her personally spinning.

No. She will be mocked and judged by other NYT reporters for messing this stupid non-story up and being blinded into thinking she’s a celebrity insider and friends/confidants with the Blakes of the world.

Totally agree with you. The pp is being nuts. The journalist will be disgraced. I feel bad for her. She was duped

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to review: the NYT is trash, not to be trusted. But Perez Hilton and the Daily Mail are infallible.

Go JB! xoxo

Well let’s take inventory. The NYT ran the Baldoni hit piece with the sham subpoena as cover. The Daily Mail did actual investigative journalism exposing the sham subpoena. The NYT still hasn’t reported on the sham subpoena and probably won’t. The Daily Fail may be a tabloid, but even a broke clock is right twice a day.

And to prove how fake this was from the get-go and how it's standard operating procedure at The Times, that hack Megan Twohey is not only not fired, she'll be promoted and/or rewarded with a windfall from Hollywood for being a good foot soldier.

It's also worth noting Twohey is from Washington and is a GU alum. It's not out of the question she is on her personally spinning.

No. She will be mocked and judged by other NYT reporters for messing this stupid non-story up and being blinded into thinking she’s a celebrity insider and friends/confidants with the Blakes of the world.

Totally agree with you. The pp is being nuts. The journalist will be disgraced. I feel bad for her. She was duped

Disgraced? Y'all are naive as hell. Is Jake Tapper disgraced running point for senile Biden? He’s still paid millions a year, still an CNN star, and was just given a multi-million book deal detailing he knew all along Biden was losing his mind (in contrast to his actual coverage on CNN!).

Twohey has not and will not be fired. She will become a multi-millionaire, if she isn’t already, off a career peddling bullshit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to review: the NYT is trash, not to be trusted. But Perez Hilton and the Daily Mail are infallible.

Go JB! xoxo

Well let’s take inventory. The NYT ran the Baldoni hit piece with the sham subpoena as cover. The Daily Mail did actual investigative journalism exposing the sham subpoena. The NYT still hasn’t reported on the sham subpoena and probably won’t. The Daily Fail may be a tabloid, but even a broke clock is right twice a day.

And to prove how fake this was from the get-go and how it's standard operating procedure at The Times, that hack Megan Twohey is not only not fired, she'll be promoted and/or rewarded with a windfall from Hollywood for being a good foot soldier.

It's also worth noting Twohey is from Washington and is a GU alum. It's not out of the question she is on her personally spinning.

No. She will be mocked and judged by other NYT reporters for messing this stupid non-story up and being blinded into thinking she’s a celebrity insider and friends/confidants with the Blakes of the world.

Totally agree with you. The pp is being nuts. The journalist will be disgraced. I feel bad for her. She was duped

Disgraced? Y'all are naive as hell. Is Jake Tapper disgraced running point for senile Biden? He’s still paid millions a year, still an CNN star, and was just given a multi-million book deal detailing he knew all along Biden was losing his mind (in contrast to his actual coverage on CNN!).

Twohey has not and will not be fired. She will become a multi-millionaire, if she isn’t already, off a career peddling bullshit.

I agree with this take. There's a big market for sleazy journalists who are willing to spin. She just raised her profile as someone willing to lie for profit. Her future is secure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to review: the NYT is trash, not to be trusted. But Perez Hilton and the Daily Mail are infallible.

Go JB! xoxo

Well let’s take inventory. The NYT ran the Baldoni hit piece with the sham subpoena as cover. The Daily Mail did actual investigative journalism exposing the sham subpoena. The NYT still hasn’t reported on the sham subpoena and probably won’t. The Daily Fail may be a tabloid, but even a broke clock is right twice a day.

And to prove how fake this was from the get-go and how it's standard operating procedure at The Times, that hack Megan Twohey is not only not fired, she'll be promoted and/or rewarded with a windfall from Hollywood for being a good foot soldier.

It's also worth noting Twohey is from Washington and is a GU alum. It's not out of the question she is on her personally spinning.

No. She will be mocked and judged by other NYT reporters for messing this stupid non-story up and being blinded into thinking she’s a celebrity insider and friends/confidants with the Blakes of the world.

Totally agree with you. The pp is being nuts. The journalist will be disgraced. I feel bad for her. She was duped

Disgraced? Y'all are naive as hell. Is Jake Tapper disgraced running point for senile Biden? He’s still paid millions a year, still an CNN star, and was just given a multi-million book deal detailing he knew all along Biden was losing his mind (in contrast to his actual coverage on CNN!).

Twohey has not and will not be fired. She will become a multi-millionaire, if she isn’t already, off a career peddling bullshit.

We're talking about professional reputation among people who know about these things, not about money/fame. No real journalist (or readers of serious journalism) think Jake Tapper is anything other than an entertainer, or that CNN is much more than dismaying fear-hype-drama. The NYT reporter may well continue to have wealth and fame but this is a major hit to her prior credibility as a Serious Reporter and that is something totally different. IYKYK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to review: the NYT is trash, not to be trusted. But Perez Hilton and the Daily Mail are infallible.

Go JB! xoxo

Well let’s take inventory. The NYT ran the Baldoni hit piece with the sham subpoena as cover. The Daily Mail did actual investigative journalism exposing the sham subpoena. The NYT still hasn’t reported on the sham subpoena and probably won’t. The Daily Fail may be a tabloid, but even a broke clock is right twice a day.

And to prove how fake this was from the get-go and how it's standard operating procedure at The Times, that hack Megan Twohey is not only not fired, she'll be promoted and/or rewarded with a windfall from Hollywood for being a good foot soldier.

It's also worth noting Twohey is from Washington and is a GU alum. It's not out of the question she is on her personally spinning.

Omg. You so, so, so want to believe you are on here interacting with celebrities and important journalists and not just housewives and moms. You’re so adamant that there aren’t bots or seeded stories against Lively, but one of you thought Lively herself was posting in here, and now Twohey. 👌

DP. I think it's well established that the ENTIRE REASON for this drama is that Blake was upset that randos were saying mean things about her on the internet. We don't know which randos she was upset about and it doesn't really matter. It confirms that she is, indeed, looking at the internet for gossip about herself. So I dont think its out of bounds for anyone to wonder if she reads this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to review: the NYT is trash, not to be trusted. But Perez Hilton and the Daily Mail are infallible.

Go JB! xoxo

Well let’s take inventory. The NYT ran the Baldoni hit piece with the sham subpoena as cover. The Daily Mail did actual investigative journalism exposing the sham subpoena. The NYT still hasn’t reported on the sham subpoena and probably won’t. The Daily Fail may be a tabloid, but even a broke clock is right twice a day.

And to prove how fake this was from the get-go and how it's standard operating procedure at The Times, that hack Megan Twohey is not only not fired, she'll be promoted and/or rewarded with a windfall from Hollywood for being a good foot soldier.

It's also worth noting Twohey is from Washington and is a GU alum. It's not out of the question she is on her personally spinning.

No. She will be mocked and judged by other NYT reporters for messing this stupid non-story up and being blinded into thinking she’s a celebrity insider and friends/confidants with the Blakes of the world.

Totally agree with you. The pp is being nuts. The journalist will be disgraced. I feel bad for her. She was duped

Disgraced? Y'all are naive as hell. Is Jake Tapper disgraced running point for senile Biden? He’s still paid millions a year, still an CNN star, and was just given a multi-million book deal detailing he knew all along Biden was losing his mind (in contrast to his actual coverage on CNN!).

Twohey has not and will not be fired. She will become a multi-millionaire, if she isn’t already, off a career peddling bullshit.

We're talking about professional reputation among people who know about these things, not about money/fame. No real journalist (or readers of serious journalism) think Jake Tapper is anything other than an entertainer, or that CNN is much more than dismaying fear-hype-drama. The NYT reporter may well continue to have wealth and fame but this is a major hit to her prior credibility as a Serious Reporter and that is something totally different. IYKYK.

Okay, well you gatekeep that Trusted Reporter bit (and good luck finding anyone member of the public willing to actually extend that trust to the media) while Jake and Ms Twohey rake in the cash. I'm sure she'll reserve some of that cash to wipe her tears about being the target of professional jealousy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Daily Mail may be a tabloid but it’s messy AF and I love it!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14721283/unreported-truth-picture-Taylor-Swift-Travis-Kelce-Blake-Lively-MAUREEN-CALLAHAN.html

Blake Lively has never seemed particularly bright. But her alleged attempt to blackmail Taylor Swift by threatening to leak private texts will be the end of her — socially, professionally and reputationally.

Jenny slate was valedictorian of her hyper competetive Boston prep school and went to “real Columbia” (not general studies) for undergrad.

The allegedly intelligence and business savvy of these Hollywood bozos is always fake. Blake and Ryan are both uneducated morons; Blake especially so.

[Anonymous]

Why are so many journalists taking Blake's side and insistent on this notion that pro-Baldoni supporters are alt-righters? It's ridiculous. There was that mommy sleuths article in Glamour. And the latest dumb take is from Slate, by Heather Schwedel:

"It’s Lively contention that the public’s sudden dislike for her didn’t spring out of nowhere and in fact had a clear cause: a smear campaign orchestrated by her It Ends With Us director and co-star Justin Baldoni and his associates. She filed a legal complaint against them in December, alleging that the effort to ruin her reputation was retaliation for Lively speaking out about the uncomfortable environment on the film’s set. Baldoni fought back, filing a lawsuit against the New York Times, which reported on Lively’s complaint, as well as Lively herself, alleging that their conflict was a result not of his misconduct but her efforts to wrest control of the movie from him. Initially, Lively seemed to seize back some goodwill and prompt reflection among some of the people who had joined the pile-on against her, but as the weeks wore on, public reaction congealed into something else entirely: Support for Baldoni built into a full-fledged online movement, with the flames fanned by right-wingers taking up the cause and Baldoni’s own legal team, which fed his supporters a steady stream of content on which to perform half-baked analysis. Every new bit of information only confirmed their belief in Baldoni’s innocence. When, for instance, Baldoni’s side released a rambling, apologetic, over-familiar voice note he recorded for Lively during filming, it didn’t matter that many reasonable people were creeped out by it—to Baldoni supporters, it was yet more evidence of Lively’s lies."

https://slate.com/life/2025/05/blake-lively-justin-baldoni-ryan-reynolds-lawsuit.html