LCPS is making the news...again

Anonymous
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/KtJ3s6YECAc" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>



I sent it to my sister. She asked if it was satire. Sadly, no.

Remember when everyone went on the internet and complained about snow days? I miss those days.
Anonymous
Try this link for the actual video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtJ3s6YECAc
Anonymous


It's crazy town in LoCo!
Anonymous
0:09 expression = "omg this woman is batsh1t crazy"
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


It's crazy town in LoCo!


I watched this last night. These people are certifiable and frightening. I want them nowhere near my kid's school curriculum.
Anonymous
I wish this could be circulated so widely thought to voters in nova.

Do Youngkin voters not see how crazy and ignorant she is? Or do they just agree with her?
Anonymous
I would like to see the unedited version. The woman doesn't seem like the brightest bulb, but after reading about Couric's edit of Ginsburg, I'm skeptical of all of these interviews.

I am against Critical Race Theory training that is guiding teachers on how to present information.

I am not against teaching history. I am against condemning kids by the color of their skin. I taught all kinds of kids and there is one thing I know: no child benefits from being told he is a victim and no child benefits by being made to feel guilty. Compassionate? Yes.

The materials being presented in some schools is based on Critical Race Theory and "anti-racism" which is actually racist. Demonizing police in picture books for very young children is one example. Claiming that police are out attacking Black men.
Anonymous
I watched the video and I didn't think she came out looking crazy. And I'm a liberal democrat. I think she sounded like she was saying the quiet part out loud--and felt comfortable doing so. There will be people who view this and think she is entirely reasonable.

We're coming out of a period of PCness when people went through the motion of being careful what they said in public about racial/ethnic majorities, LGBTQ, etc. because "You can't say that these days." Trump and the Repub. party gave them permission to say it loud and proud. And they're doing just that...and feeling good about it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I would like to see the unedited version. The woman doesn't seem like the brightest bulb, but after reading about Couric's edit of Ginsburg, I'm skeptical of all of these interviews.

I am against Critical Race Theory training that is guiding teachers on how to present information.

I am not against teaching history. I am against condemning kids by the color of their skin. I taught all kinds of kids and there is one thing I know: no child benefits from being told he is a victim and no child benefits by being made to feel guilty. Compassionate? Yes.

The materials being presented in some schools is based on Critical Race Theory and "anti-racism" which is actually racist. Demonizing police in picture books for very young children is one example. Claiming that police are out attacking Black men.



Boy have you ever drank the right-wing Kool-Aid. Your understanding of CRT is completely wrong and it’s not guiding any teaching besides. Anti-racism is not actually racist — did right wing media give you that idea? As for police, name one title. Just one.
Anonymous
White woman doesn’t think there is racism. Literally film at 11…
Anonymous
I am against Critical race theory training because the schools that happily shell out money for consultants, workshops and curriculum guides are the exact same schools who never even bothered or will bother to do simple, free and easy things such as actually try and recruit some diverse teachers and staff. Not by just published some tag line on their website but actually reaching out to colleges and universities with diverse populations to recruit, advertising open positions not just in their own area but a much larger basis. Then there is the very easy look at the books in the school and add some that reflect lots of writers from lots of places with lots of viewpoints.

Simple stuff but most schools don't even try and do this before moving on to paying big bucks for someone to come in an do workshops and "consult". The schools are looking to check a box not really change and that just results in weird classroom lessons, and strange attempts at pollical correctness. And they are both usually at the expense of non-white students since they end up feeling really uncomfortable with these one off weird lesson plans and strange conversations.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I watched the video and I didn't think she came out looking crazy. And I'm a liberal democrat. I think she sounded like she was saying the quiet part out loud--and felt comfortable doing so. There will be people who view this and think she is entirely reasonable.

We're coming out of a period of PCness when people went through the motion of being careful what they said in public about racial/ethnic majorities, LGBTQ, etc. because "You can't say that these days." Trump and the Repub. party gave them permission to say it loud and proud. And they're doing just that...and feeling good about it.


So you’re saying that she’s not crazy, just an open racist/bigot.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I am against Critical race theory training because the schools that happily shell out money for consultants, workshops and curriculum guides are the exact same schools who never even bothered or will bother to do simple, free and easy things such as actually try and recruit some diverse teachers and staff. Not by just published some tag line on their website but actually reaching out to colleges and universities with diverse populations to recruit, advertising open positions not just in their own area but a much larger basis. Then there is the very easy look at the books in the school and add some that reflect lots of writers from lots of places with lots of viewpoints.

Simple stuff but most schools don't even try and do this before moving on to paying big bucks for someone to come in an do workshops and "consult". The schools are looking to check a box not really change and that just results in weird classroom lessons, and strange attempts at pollical correctness. And they are both usually at the expense of non-white students since they end up feeling really uncomfortable with these one off weird lesson plans and strange conversations.


CRT training is a phantom menace. This is not a thing. It’s an elaborate straw man to whip up anger and fear in suburban voters.
Anonymous
No racism in LoCo? Lady, how may times have KKK flyers been found scattered throughout Leesburg?
post reply Forum Index » VA Public Schools other than FCPS
Message Quick Reply
Go to: