Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:*know

Touché, pp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even though he claimed he wasn’t a racist, his rhetoric had racist undertones no doubt.

Like when he stated emphatically that Black people disproportionately committed the majority of crimes.
And that most prisoners were Black.
How is that not a racist belief??
By pigeonholing Black people into negative stereotypical situations at best he was promoting racist propaganda.

He also claimed that he wasn’t transphobic, yet he said that trans people were confused and living in mental delusion.
He touted their behavior as a simple mental illness.

And he doesn’t believe that citizenship should be given to someone just because they were born here.
Yet in the same breath he also was very vocal against illegal immigration.
He believed that to be legal that you had to be “invited” to the U.S.
Whaaat?

Shortly after his tragic and untimely death anyone who said anything even remotely negative about Charlie Kirk was vilified.
Many even lost their jobs.

Yet now, weeks later I think people have had enough time to figure out what a homo/transphobic, racist this man was and how he never stood for America, Jesus, etc……he was not an accurate depiction of who us Westerners fundamentally ARE.

Dave Chapelle likely will not get cancelled over what he said about Charlie but had he said it a few wks ago he may have, who really knows??

Jesus said, “You will know them by their fruits.”

You might disagree with some of the beliefs Charlie Kirk had but he built a movement based on peace, love, and forgiveness.

When he was murdered, did his followers riot, destroy property, and attack others?

No. They prayed and held candlelight vigils. They mourned and lifted up one another.

I would much rather be a part of what TPUSA is offering as opposed to movements of the left.

This is so far from reality. He had an organization backed by powerful MAGA and foreign governments. He needed to keep donors happy. And, to that he had to proselytize conservatism to young people to counter their "indoctrination" on college campuses.

[Anonymous]

Rightwing terminally-online teenager from NJ murdered two girls he knew for reporting him on social media and for a post one made criticizing Charlie Kirk.

Instead of playing sports or going on dates, 17 year-old boys are being brainwashed by rightwing propaganda online.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even though he claimed he wasn’t a racist, his rhetoric had racist undertones no doubt.

Like when he stated emphatically that Black people disproportionately committed the majority of crimes.
And that most prisoners were Black.
How is that not a racist belief??
By pigeonholing Black people into negative stereotypical situations at best he was promoting racist propaganda.

He also claimed that he wasn’t transphobic, yet he said that trans people were confused and living in mental delusion.
He touted their behavior as a simple mental illness.

And he doesn’t believe that citizenship should be given to someone just because they were born here.
Yet in the same breath he also was very vocal against illegal immigration.
He believed that to be legal that you had to be “invited” to the U.S.
Whaaat?

Shortly after his tragic and untimely death anyone who said anything even remotely negative about Charlie Kirk was vilified.
Many even lost their jobs.

Yet now, weeks later I think people have had enough time to figure out what a homo/transphobic, racist this man was and how he never stood for America, Jesus, etc……he was not an accurate depiction of who us Westerners fundamentally ARE.

Dave Chapelle likely will not get cancelled over what he said about Charlie but had he said it a few wks ago he may have, who really knows??

Jesus said, “You will know them by their fruits.”

You might disagree with some of the beliefs Charlie Kirk had but he built a movement based on peace, love, and forgiveness.

When he was murdered, did his followers riot, destroy property, and attack others?

No. They prayed and held candlelight vigils. They mourned and lifted up one another.

I would much rather be a part of what TPUSA is offering as opposed to movements of the left.

He’s built a small fortune from the gullible by farming TikTok with his act. *swipe up* like the media and everybody else

I consider any movement that has encouraged millions to seek Christ to be a noble one.

You're kidding, right? The words of Christ have been bastardized by MAGA beyond belief. There's nothing Christ taught in any of their hearts.

Your a leftie. I can tell because you generalize.

Generalizing that all lefties generalize makes you a leftie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Completely normal grieving widow solo parenting small children behavior:

lol

You people are sick.
This is a woman with 2 very young children who has agreed to carry on the mission of her husband who was murdered in front of the world.
And you mock her.

It is totally unsurprising that your candidate for VA AG fantasized about murdering his political opponent. It seems to run in the blood of democrats.

According to this woman’s own Christian trad wife philosophy, she should be at home, minding her two very young children, not reinventing herself. She and her husband are worth millions of dollars. Why is she fundraising for more? Who is watching her kids when she’s “carrying on the mission of her husband”?

I agree.
I mean to be fair, when her husband was alive he bragged about how he, the man, was out working hard everyday while his wife was a mother and wife who was more than happy to stay home, raise their children while keeping the home fires continuously burning.

Then after he dies suddenly, she is seen on a podcast letting the world know that she will be taking the reins at her husband’s org, and she is discussing all the plans that she has in store to continue her husband’s work.

She is nothing like the weeping, sorrowful widow we all saw on display just the week prior.
She is even seen laughing with three guys w/out a tear in sight!!

All while her two traumatized children are being cared for by someone else.

I wonder what Charlie would think.

I understand that you all loathe Erika Kirk. I don't like her either, and I didn't like Charlie.

But statements like this are either entirely disingenuous or plain stupid.

Charlie's children are 1 and 3 years old. They are in the same home and care situation that they were before he was murdered. Their lives have not substantially changed with his death. Children don't form fixed memories until 2.5-4 years of age; both children are unlikely to have any independent memories of Charlie, but instead will learn about him from stories told to them by their mother and other adults.

Anybody who has had children or been involved in raising or caring for children and has any grasp of child development knows that Charlie's children are not traumatized by his murder at present. The most traumatizing thing they could experience at this stage of their lives would be if their mother fell apart entirely, mired herself in visible endless grief and failed to parent them or maintain their lives as they existed in August.

Please, criticize Erika all you want for her world view, her grifting, etc. - but don't talk this stupid BS about her neglecting her kids or them being traumatized by how she is handling their care following their father's murder. It's ridiculous.

Your assertion that his children may not be currently traumatized is only half true.

Sure the 1YO likely has no clue what is going on with his Dad no longer being around but a 3YO would most definitely be affected.
By that age kids have the ability to form memories and they also form significant emotional bonds with their parents.

Have you not seen the video where Charlie is on set of a talk show and behind the scenes his daughter sees him then runs into his arms?
She clearly is attached to her Father.

Duh.

Of course, but I have a fair bit of life experience with children that age losing a significant adult in their lives including a parent, and the grief process is usually along the lines of ‘daddy went to live in heaven with Jesus, but he loves you and he’ll be watching over you and you can always talk to him in your prayers’ to which 3 year old child says ‘ok, can I go play with with my Lego now?’

It’s a simple matter of child development and brain development, duh. An older child would have much more likelihood to get stuck in grief but a 3 year old not so much. As that 3 year old grows up, and starts to read incredibly toxic stuff about their beloved parent on the internet like many of the posts here, then there will be plenty of material for intensive therapy and sadly possibly suicidal ideation, but at 1 and 3 so long as those kids have mommy and beloved babysitters/Nannie’s and their favorite toys and such, they are going to be okay and it’s BS to be tearing down Erika Kirk for putting a smile on her face and getting on with life because that’s going to harm her traumatized infant and toddler/preschooler.

[Anonymous]

I heard they want to make it a national holiday as charlie is the MLK of genz

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I heard they want to make it a national holiday as charlie is the MLK of genz

Charlie Kirk was the MLK of Facebook conservative boomers who solely funded him. Look at the charitable funding documents, the story is all there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even though he claimed he wasn’t a racist, his rhetoric had racist undertones no doubt.

Like when he stated emphatically that Black people disproportionately committed the majority of crimes.
And that most prisoners were Black.
How is that not a racist belief??
By pigeonholing Black people into negative stereotypical situations at best he was promoting racist propaganda.

He also claimed that he wasn’t transphobic, yet he said that trans people were confused and living in mental delusion.
He touted their behavior as a simple mental illness.

And he doesn’t believe that citizenship should be given to someone just because they were born here.
Yet in the same breath he also was very vocal against illegal immigration.
He believed that to be legal that you had to be “invited” to the U.S.
Whaaat?

Shortly after his tragic and untimely death anyone who said anything even remotely negative about Charlie Kirk was vilified.
Many even lost their jobs.

Yet now, weeks later I think people have had enough time to figure out what a homo/transphobic, racist this man was and how he never stood for America, Jesus, etc……he was not an accurate depiction of who us Westerners fundamentally ARE.

Dave Chapelle likely will not get cancelled over what he said about Charlie but had he said it a few wks ago he may have, who really knows??

Jesus said, “You will know them by their fruits.”

You might disagree with some of the beliefs Charlie Kirk had but he built a movement based on peace, love, and forgiveness.

When he was murdered, did his followers riot, destroy property, and attack others?

No. They prayed and held candlelight vigils. They mourned and lifted up one another.

I would much rather be a part of what TPUSA is offering as opposed to movements of the left.

He’s built a small fortune from the gullible by farming TikTok with his act. *swipe up* like the media and everybody else

I consider any movement that has encouraged millions to seek Christ to be a noble one.

You're kidding, right? The words of Christ have been bastardized by MAGA beyond belief. There's nothing Christ taught in any of their hearts.

Your a leftie. I can tell because you generalize.

Generalizing that all lefties generalize makes you a leftie.

😄

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even though he claimed he wasn’t a racist, his rhetoric had racist undertones no doubt.

Like when he stated emphatically that Black people disproportionately committed the majority of crimes.
And that most prisoners were Black.
How is that not a racist belief??
By pigeonholing Black people into negative stereotypical situations at best he was promoting racist propaganda.

He also claimed that he wasn’t transphobic, yet he said that trans people were confused and living in mental delusion.
He touted their behavior as a simple mental illness.

And he doesn’t believe that citizenship should be given to someone just because they were born here.
Yet in the same breath he also was very vocal against illegal immigration.
He believed that to be legal that you had to be “invited” to the U.S.
Whaaat?

Shortly after his tragic and untimely death anyone who said anything even remotely negative about Charlie Kirk was vilified.
Many even lost their jobs.

Yet now, weeks later I think people have had enough time to figure out what a homo/transphobic, racist this man was and how he never stood for America, Jesus, etc……he was not an accurate depiction of who us Westerners fundamentally ARE.

Dave Chapelle likely will not get cancelled over what he said about Charlie but had he said it a few wks ago he may have, who really knows??

Jesus said, “You will know them by their fruits.”

You might disagree with some of the beliefs Charlie Kirk had but he built a movement based on peace, love, and forgiveness.

When he was murdered, did his followers riot, destroy property, and attack others?

No. They prayed and held candlelight vigils. They mourned and lifted up one another.

I would much rather be a part of what TPUSA is offering as opposed to movements of the left.

He’s built a small fortune from the gullible by farming TikTok with his act. *swipe up* like the media and everybody else

I consider any movement that has encouraged millions to seek Christ to be a noble one.

You're kidding, right? The words of Christ have been bastardized by MAGA beyond belief. There's nothing Christ taught in any of their hearts.

Your a leftie. I can tell because you generalize.

I'm not the PP you're responding to, but I just want to add that I can tell you're a MAGA because you don't now the difference between "your" and "you're."

LOL! You generalized too! According to you if you misspell something you're a MAGA.

[Anonymous]

political violence stoked by the right

Judge Diane Goodstein's home is burning to the ground after an explosion. SLED is investigation as arson and refer attack as Judge Goodstein had been receiving multiple threats.

attacked by Stephen Miller and lawyers at the DOJ

https://bsky.app/profile/thetnholler.bsky.social/post/3m2i52h75fs2d

[Anonymous]

Even if it wasn’t Erika Kirk, I still would take issue with anyone weeping in front of the world one day then days later laughing it up on a podcast when her beloved husband had just been brutally murdered.
I don’t see how that is so difficult to comprehend.
There is no “timeframe” mandated for one to properly grieve one’s loved one - it is poposterious to even imagine one - but I think any common sense should dictate that one must not be appearing in public so soon after losing one’s spouse.

*** However I also recognize that we live in a free country where we have free will.
So yes, we can do whatever we want, whenever we want.

This is just my opinion, that’s all……

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even though he claimed he wasn’t a racist, his rhetoric had racist undertones no doubt.

Like when he stated emphatically that Black people disproportionately committed the majority of crimes.
And that most prisoners were Black.
How is that not a racist belief??.S.

It’s kind of true

There are also and historically have been many murderers who were or are not Black.

What about most recently Bryan K., the guy who just admitted to murdering those four college kids in Idaho.
Or what about that White guy that shot Kirk? Wasn’t he White??

And Dahmer, the BLK killer, Ted Bundy, etc.

What Charlie said about Black people proportionally committing the most crimes was just wrong.

And he falsely stated publicly that George Floyd died from an actual drug overdose!!?
When his autopsy & clear video shows he was killed by a police officer who stood on his neck.

He even called the aftermath of his murder “Floyd-a-Mania.”
If that doesn’t make him a lying racist then I don’t know what does.

How can anyone in their right mind align themself with someone who would portray such a violent + unjust killing by a cop as a “mania??” 😠
Wrestlemania had zero to do with the aftermath of Floyd’s murder.

Even if I agreed with everything else that Charlie Kirk stood for (I do not,) just this one fact would make me not like him.
At all.

Americans watched in horror as a human being was brutally killed by a police officer kneeling on his neck, thus suffocating + smothering him.
We watched helpless as this person said multiple times that he could not breathe, then we heard him calling out for his Mother shortly before dying.
It was clearly obvious that this poor man was being shown zero mercy by the cop and it is also obvious that the victim was dying before our eyes.
By a cop -> NOT a drug OD.
Yet Kirk would walk into colleges and claim that George Floyd died from a drug OD.
He put this spin on it to make others think that it was his own fault that he died.

He called the aftermath of his death “Floydamania” which is obviously insensitive as well as hugely disrespectful.

Yet no one thought to cancel him for making such nefarious comments after his death.
If that isn’t White Privilege then I do not know what is.

[Anonymous]

Floydmania??????

Did he really use this exact term verbatim?
I have never heard this before.

Source?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Floydmania??????

Did he really use this exact term verbatim?
I have never heard this before.

Source?

He sure did use this term. During his debate at Cambridge University in the UK earlier this year.
When he used this term there was even an audible groan from the collective student body present.
And they weren’t even from here!

[Anonymous]

wtf