Rich middle aged CEO going viral busted at Coldplay concert cheating of his wife with his HR director

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The hr woman is so ugly and old, it's totally embarrassing to the CEO, career-ending based on how ugly and old it means he has no game or ability to manage anything or get someone worthy of cheating on, low class and sad for him, he deserves to be fired, divorced, and put in prison.

He's no looker.

Right? I love the assumption that a 58 year old tech dweeb can organically do so much better. Spoiler: He can't.

He's worth 20m-70M. He could be an obese 75yo and he could get a 25yo model airhead. $$$$$ talks!!

You people are clueless. Where does a 58 year old married dweeb meet 25 year old models eager to sleep with him? Your juvenile hypotheticals are not real life, where things happen organically because you’re in proximity to each other. Unless the guy wanted prostitutes or de facto prostitutes off of seeking arrangements, the most likely affair partner is a 40 or 50 something middle aged colleague or industry peer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The hr woman is so ugly and old, it's totally embarrassing to the CEO, career-ending based on how ugly and old it means he has no game or ability to manage anything or get someone worthy of cheating on, low class and sad for him, he deserves to be fired, divorced, and put in prison.

He's no looker.

Right? I love the assumption that a 58 year old tech dweeb can organically do so much better. Spoiler: He can't.

He's worth 20m-70M. He could be an obese 75yo and he could get a 25yo model airhead. $$$$$ talks!!

You people are clueless. Where does a 58 year old married dweeb meet 25 year old models eager to sleep with him? Your juvenile hypotheticals are not real life, where things happen organically because you’re in proximity to each other. Unless the guy wanted prostitutes or de facto prostitutes off of seeking arrangements, the most likely affair partner is a 40 or 50 something middle aged colleague or industry peer.

Epsteins island

Any Republican fundraiser

Any Republican Party

Don Jrs new club

Maralago

Any social media

Ie what do you think only fans is for?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This stupid story needs to die. Enough. Let's move on.

Two old serial cheating whores lost their jobs. Not much to talk about anymore.

[Anonymous]

Sleeping with an intern or some half prostitute 20-something schemer from an app is a quick ticket to MeToo and extortion.

Married middle aged professionals cheat when there’s an opportunity. I’m guessing these two were traveling together and/or met before she was hired at an industry event.

You cheat with someone else who’s married because it’s mutually assured destruction; i.e. he or she’s unlikely to rat you out and blow up your life. This was featured in Clooney’s “Up In The Air” movie, where the Type A woman characterizes an on the road affair as just an escape from real life; a parentheses.

[Anonymous]

Married middle aged cheating is almost always about immediate proximity. Colleagues, industry peers, and social orbit 9 times out of 10. A 58 year old tech guy in Boston is never at parties full of bottom-feeding young “models” fishing for rich men. Young women worth a shit can bag rich boys their own age, they’re not sleeping with a gross old man.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous]Married middle aged cheating is almost always about immediate proximity. Colleagues, industry peers, and social orbit 9 times out of 10. A 58 year old tech guy in Boston is never at parties full of bottom-feeding young “models” fishing for rich men. Young women worth a shit can bag rich boys their own age, they’re not sleeping with a gross old man.[/quote]

Tell that to Bill Belichek.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Married middle aged cheating is almost always about immediate proximity. Colleagues, industry peers, and social orbit 9 times out of 10. A 58 year old tech guy in Boston is never at parties full of bottom-feeding young “models” fishing for rich men. Young women worth a shit can bag rich boys their own age, they’re not sleeping with a gross old man.[/quote]

Tell that to Bill Belichek. [/quote]

+1 exactly!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This has officially jumped the shark and they paid Gwyneth Paltrow millions of dollars to shoot a 60 second cheeky ad. So painfully cringe. This is clearly not a serious company. And shame on Paltrow for inserting herself into her ex-husband’s hyper viral moment.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14942209/Gwyneth-Paltrow-Astronomer-CEO-affair-scandal.html

It's hilarious. And props to GP and Chris Martin for keeping their divorce clean.

+1 It's perfect!!

A washed up divorced actress thirsty for attention (and a quick buck) making light of adultery, broken families, and innocent spouses and minor kids being humiliated and permanently hurt. So cheeky & hilarious!

Not.

It is totally classless and piling on the innocent parties involved. I’d say shame on Paltrow but she clearly has no shame.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This has officially jumped the shark and they paid Gwyneth Paltrow millions of dollars to shoot a 60 second cheeky ad. So painfully cringe. This is clearly not a serious company. And shame on Paltrow for inserting herself into her ex-husband’s hyper viral moment.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14942209/Gwyneth-Paltrow-Astronomer-CEO-affair-scandal.html

It's hilarious. And props to GP and Chris Martin for keeping their divorce clean.

+1 It's perfect!!

A washed up divorced actress thirsty for attention (and a quick buck) making light of adultery, broken families, and innocent spouses and minor kids being humiliated and permanently hurt. So cheeky & hilarious!

Not.

It is totally classless and piling on the innocent parties involved. I’d say shame on Paltrow but she clearly has no shame.

Agreed - this was so low class and tacky by Paltrow and the company. wtf were they thinking?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This has officially jumped the shark and they paid Gwyneth Paltrow millions of dollars to shoot a 60 second cheeky ad. So painfully cringe. This is clearly not a serious company. And shame on Paltrow for inserting herself into her ex-husband’s hyper viral moment.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14942209/Gwyneth-Paltrow-Astronomer-CEO-affair-scandal.html

It's hilarious. And props to GP and Chris Martin for keeping their divorce clean.

+1 It's perfect!!

A washed up divorced actress thirsty for attention (and a quick buck) making light of adultery, broken families, and innocent spouses and minor kids being humiliated and permanently hurt. So cheeky & hilarious!

Not.

It is totally classless and piling on the innocent parties involved. I’d say shame on Paltrow but she clearly has no shame.

Agreed - this was so low class and tacky by Paltrow and the company. wtf were they thinking?

Well, their recent CEO and HR person led the company by example. They didn't care about their kids or spouses and showed the world how to be low class and tacky.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The hr woman is so ugly and old, it's totally embarrassing to the CEO, career-ending based on how ugly and old it means he has no game or ability to manage anything or get someone worthy of cheating on, low class and sad for him, he deserves to be fired, divorced, and put in prison.

He's no looker.

Right? I love the assumption that a 58 year old tech dweeb can organically do so much better. Spoiler: He can't.

He's worth 20m-70M. He could be an obese 75yo and he could get a 25yo model airhead. $$$$$ talks!!

He lives in a 1.4m house in Worcester and his wife is a teacher…. He is worth nowhere near that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The hr woman is so ugly and old, it's totally embarrassing to the CEO, career-ending based on how ugly and old it means he has no game or ability to manage anything or get someone worthy of cheating on, low class and sad for him, he deserves to be fired, divorced, and put in prison.

He's no looker.

Right? I love the assumption that a 58 year old tech dweeb can organically do so much better. Spoiler: He can't.

He's worth 20m-70M. He could be an obese 75yo and he could get a 25yo model airhead. $$$$$ talks!!

He lives in a 1.4m house in Worcester and his wife is a teacher…. He is worth nowhere near that.

And his wife has escaped to their other 2.4M house in Kennebunkport. She is director of a school (not just a teacher).

The internet estimates his worth as 50M - 70M.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's being reported she resigned. However, Astronomer has not said if they did or did not pay out a large severance for her to resign in lieu of a protracted lawsuit.

Astronomer HR exec Kristin Cabot seen for first time without her wedding ring as she resigns over Coldplay kiss cam scandal

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14937675/Astronomer-HR-exec-Kristin-Cabot-resigns-shes-seen-time-without-wedding-ring-Coldplay-kisscam-scandal.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's being reported she resigned. However, Astronomer has not said if they did or did not pay out a large severance for her to resign in lieu of a protracted lawsuit.

Astronomer HR exec Kristin Cabot seen for first time without her wedding ring as she resigns over Coldplay kiss cam scandal

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14937675/Astronomer-HR-exec-Kristin-Cabot-resigns-shes-seen-time-without-wedding-ring-Coldplay-kisscam-scandal.html

Grandma watering the flowers.

[Anonymous]

There is no way she received a settlement from her company.